Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 05:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 118
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2006, 08:41
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.

(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

Please explain
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2006, 20:00
E is wrong since it's not for having cars that were driven with their odometer disconnected but that it was fined for test-driving these cars( with odometer disconnected).
Only D makes this logical point clear.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2006, 20:22
buzzgaurav wrote:
E is wrong since it's not for having cars that were driven with their odometer disconnected but that it was fined for test-driving these cars( with odometer disconnected).
Only D makes this logical point clear.


Good one! :cool One more for D.
  [#permalink] 24 Apr 2006, 20:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic In December of 1987 an automobile manufacture pleaded no bsv180985 19 25 Nov 2009, 01:03
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no vivek123 3 28 Feb 2006, 10:34
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no amy_v 6 24 Nov 2005, 11:48
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no rahuluec 6 02 Nov 2005, 18:41
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no nakib77 4 01 Nov 2005, 13:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.