Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 24 Aug 2016, 13:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In each of the past five years,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 525 [3] , given: 136

In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2013, 07:58
3
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (02:32) correct 23% (01:31) wrong based on 222 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In each of the past five years, Barraland's prison population has increased. Yet, according to official government statistics, for none of those years has there been either an increase in the number of criminal cases brought to trial, or an increase in the rate at which convictions have been obtained. Clearly, therefore, the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences is on the increase.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In Barraland the range of punishments that can be imposed instead of a prison sentence is wide.
B. Over the last ten years, overcrowding in the prisons of Barraland has essentially been eliminated as a result of an ambitious program of prison construction.
C. Ten years ago, Barraland reformed its criminal justice system, imposing longer minimum sentences for those crimes for which a prison sentence had long been mandatory.
D. Barraland has been supervising convicts on parole more closely in recent years, with the result that parole violations have become significantly less frequent.
E. The number of people in Barraland who feel that crime is on the increase is significantly greater now than it was five years ago.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 80
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 62 [3] , given: 2

Re: In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2013, 11:44
3
KUDOS
This is a good weaken question:
C1: In each of the past five years, Barraland's prison population has increased.
P1: Yet, according to official government statistics, for none of those years has there been either an increase in the number of criminal cases brought to trial, or an increase in the rate at which convictions have been obtained
Conclusion: the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences is on the increase.

We need to find the statement what will weaken the conclusion which claims that % of people convicted of crimes is on increase.

Lets look at the answer choices:

A. In Barraland the range of punishments that can be imposed instead of a prison sentence is wide.
This does not directly deal with or tell us why the % of people convicted of crimes is on the rise. It deals with prisons, but does not directly deal with the conclusion. So not it.

B. Over the last ten years, overcrowding in the prisons of Barraland has essentially been eliminated as a result of an ambitious program of prison construction.
Out of scope. Overcrowding is not mentioned in the passage and does not deal with the conclusion

C. Ten years ago, Barraland reformed its criminal justice system, imposing longer minimum sentences for those crimes for which a prison sentence had long been mandatory.
Now this is a good choice which claims that something that started 10 years ago is a result for more attendance in prison. It clearly states that the % of people in prison is increasing, not because of people convicted of crimes, but because of something (imposing longer minimum sentence for those crimes for which a prison sentence had long been mandatory) that started 10 years ago. This weakens the conclusion and is the correct answer!

D. Barraland has been supervising convicts on parole more closely in recent years, with the result that parole violations have become significantly less frequent.
Parole deals with people already out of prison and is out of scope, Not it

E. The number of people in Barraland who feel that crime is on the increase is significantly greater now than it was five years ago.
It does not matter how many people 'feel' that crime is on the increase. Does not relate to our conclusion. Too broad to be the correct answer.

Hope this helps!
_________________

Kudos if I helped

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 525 [0], given: 136

Re: In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2013, 20:15
igotthis wrote:
D. Barraland has been supervising convicts on parole more closely in recent years, with the result that parole violations have become significantly less frequent.
Parole deals with people already out of prison and is out of scope, Not it

I liked your elimination, however I feel that the reason for eliminating is not because it is out of scope but because it is a strengthener. It is giving you a reason that people who are on parole are not likely to come back, and hence crowding in the prison could be because of the percentage of people getting convicted is on increase.
And.. remember Answer choices in Weaken and Strengthen questions are likely to be Out of Scope.
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Current Student
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 915
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 600 [1] , given: 322

Re: In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2014, 21:33
1
KUDOS
Premise: Prison person increased, Criminal cases not increased, Convictions not increased.
Conclusion: So, Prisoners/convicts must have increased.

If I prove that prisoners increased not because of convicts but because of something else, then that would weaken the conclusion.

In each of the past five years, Barraland's prison population has increased. Yet, according to official government statistics, for none of those years has there been either an increase in the number of criminal cases brought to trial, or an increase in the rate at which convictions have been obtained. Clearly, therefore, the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences is on the increase.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In Barraland the range of punishments that can be imposed instead of a prison sentence is wide.
If range is high, then why prisoners increased?
B. Over the last ten years, overcrowding in the prisons of Barraland has essentially been eliminated as a result of an ambitious program of prison construction.
Even if a program has been eliminated, its relation with the convict-prisoner hasn't been mentioned.
C. Ten years ago, Barraland reformed its criminal justice system, imposing longer minimum sentences for those crimes for which a prison sentence had long been mandatory.
Bingo ! Prisoners are living longer than they used to before.
D. Barraland has been supervising convicts on parole more closely in recent years, with the result that parole violations have become significantly less frequent.
Violations less frequent-> low number of convicts-> then why prisoner population increased?
E. The number of people in Barraland who feel that crime is on the increase is significantly greater now than it was five years ago.
Irrelevant.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9166
Followers: 800

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2015, 14:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9166
Followers: 800

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2016, 22:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 306
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: Yale '18
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 235

Re: In each of the past five years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2016, 03:39
In each of the past five years, Barraland's prison population has increased. Yet, according to official government statistics, for none of those years has there been either an increase in the number of criminal cases brought to trial, or an increase in the rate at which convictions have been obtained. Clearly, therefore, the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences is on the increase.

X year
criminal case brought to trial =100
Convicted people =50
Prison population = 25
the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences = 50 %

Y year
criminal case brought to trial =100
Convicted people =50
Prison population = 40
the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences = 80 %

Conclusion ->
the percentage of people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences is on the increase.

Logical Gap :-
1> Prison population can be increased if Not convicted people also stay in Prison for the duration as they await for trial. (Some are on bail and some are not) that can mess up with prison population.
2> Prisoner stay for a longer time now.
So let's say if 10 years back, 5 years sentence were given, prisoner convicted at that time, left the prison 5 years back. But if 10 years back, 10 years sentence were given, prisoner convicted at that time are still in the prison. THis doesn't mean that people convicted of crimes who are being given prison sentences is on the increase.It is just that time of prison sentence made a difference.

C. Ten years ago, Barraland reformed its criminal justice system, imposing longer minimum sentences for those crimes for which a prison sentence had long been mandatory.
Correct

D. Barraland has been supervising convicts on parole more closely in recent years, with the result that parole violations have become significantly less frequent. => Strengthen the conclusion.
Re: In each of the past five years,   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2016, 03:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 During each of the past five years, the total demand for 13 09 Oct 2010, 12:21
1 Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut 4 31 Mar 2010, 06:21
2 Og11 Cr-9 Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city 7 21 Jan 2010, 15:07
2 Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut 7 05 Aug 2009, 19:49
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut 7 24 Jun 2008, 16:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by