Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2014, 17:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 232 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2009, 01:10
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (02:03) correct 20% (02:20) wrong based on 37 sessions
In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of fish increased by 4.5 percent, and the total consumption of poultry products increased by 9.0 percent. During this time, the population of Eastland increased by 6 percent, in part due to new arrivals from surrounding areas.
Which of the following, if true, can one infer based on the statements above?

A) For new arrivals to Eastland between 2000 and 2005, fish was less likely to be a major part of families’ diet than was poultry.

B) In 2005, the residents of Eastland consumed twice as much poultry as fish.

C) The per capita consumption of poultry in Eastland was higher in 2005 than it was in 2000.

D) Between 2000 and 2005, both fish and poultry products were a regular part of the diet of a significant proportion of Eastland residents.

E) Between 2000 and 2005, the profits of wholesale distributors of poultry products increased at a greater rate than did the profits of wholesale distributors of fish.

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


EXPLAIN PLEASE....
8 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 27
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [8] , given: 0

Re: consumption Eastland [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2009, 03:54
8
This post received
KUDOS
A. is incorrect, since we only have info about the total consumption of poultry/fish. What if two families ate something like 2 tons of chicken and 1000 families ate something like 2 pounds of fish every day?

B. the passage does not provide info about the quantities of fish/poultry consumed, it just points out their respective gains.

C. is correct. Look at it mathematically:
population in 2000 = x
population in 2005 = 106% *x

poultry in 2000 = y
poultry in 2005 = 109% *y

per capita poultry consumption in 2000 = y/x
per capita poultry consumption in 2005 = 109%y/106%x = y/x * 109/106 > y/x

D. no info to establish this

E. profits are not discussed here. Indeed, the amount sold was greater, but what if costs increased significantly, say by 20%? Then the profits go down...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 232 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: consumption Eastland [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2009, 22:25
nicely explained dana... kudos..
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 359
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [2] , given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: consumption Eastland [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2009, 21:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
seldom see such CRs... test on maths..
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: consumption Eastland [#permalink] New post 17 Aug 2009, 03:31
C it is.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: consumption Eastland [#permalink] New post 17 Aug 2009, 09:12
DanaJ wrote:
A. is incorrect, since we only have info about the total consumption of poultry/fish. What if two families ate something like 2 tons of chicken and 1000 families ate something like 2 pounds of fish every day?

B. the passage does not provide info about the quantities of fish/poultry consumed, it just points out their respective gains.

C. is correct. Look at it mathematically:
population in 2000 = x
population in 2005 = 106% *x

poultry in 2000 = y
poultry in 2005 = 109% *y

per capita poultry consumption in 2000 = y/x
per capita poultry consumption in 2005 = 109%y/106%x = y/x * 109/106 > y/x

D. no info to establish this

E. profits are not discussed here. Indeed, the amount sold was greater, but what if costs increased significantly, say by 20%? Then the profits go down...


nice explanation. thanks +1 for ya.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 191
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 4

Re: In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2012, 20:35
at first i thought it was D, but looking a it again we can see that the % increase in population is lower than the % increase in the consumption of poultry so we should see an increase in poultry consumption per capita.
Also, the stimulus only talks about percentages never actual numbers so our answer should reflect only based on percentages not actual figures.
_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 143
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 24

GMAT Tests User
Re: In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2012, 04:15
very clear C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 291
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2012, 06:03
C is the answer
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 58
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2012, 22:08
In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of fish increased by 4.5 percent, and the total consumption of poultry products increased by 9.0 percent. During this time, the population of Eastland increased by 6 percent, in part due to new arrivals from surrounding areas.
Which of the following, if true, can one infer based on the statements above?

A) For new arrivals to Eastland between 2000 and 2005, fish was less likely to be a major part of families’ diet than was poultry. Though percentage increase in Eastland's population (6%) is higher than percentage increase in fish consumption (4.5%), it is possible that some of existing population have reduced consumption of fish despite higher/same consumption of fish from new entrants in Eastland. Incorrect

B) In 2005, the residents of Eastland consumed twice as much poultry as fish.nothing in the stimulus state about relative amount of fish and poultry consumption. It states about percent increase in consumption which does not translate directly into amount. Incorrect

C) The per capita consumption of poultry in Eastland was higher in 2005 than it was in 2000. Suppose in year 2000, consumption of poultary was X while population was Y, thus percapita consumption was Y/X. Now in 2005 , Poultry consumption increased by 9 percent, thus amount poultry consumption was 1.09 X. Similarly, population increased by 6%, therefore new population is 1.06 Y. Combining these two data, in 2005, per capita consumption is 1.09X/1.06 Y > X/Y (IN 2000). IMO Correct answer

D) Between 2000 and 2005, both fish and poultry products were a regular part of the diet of a significant proportion of Eastland residents.nothing in the stimulus states this fact. Incorrect

E) Between 2000 and 2005, the profits of wholesale distributors of poultry products increased at a greater rate than did the profits of wholesale distributors of fish.out of scope. stimulus doesn't states profit anywhere.Incorect
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1467
Followers: 208

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2013, 09:47
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2013, 09:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of manalq8 2 25 Nov 2011, 13:40
From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country singh_amit19 5 17 Oct 2007, 11:33
From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country Puilunchristin 4 16 Jan 2006, 14:01
2 From 1973 to 1976, total United States consumption of chunjuwu 6 15 Dec 2004, 09:45
1 From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country mba4me 9 10 Sep 2004, 07:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.