Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic [#permalink]
23 Dec 2005, 23:57
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. The current student-teacher ratio at Vargoniaâ€™s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargoniaâ€™s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D. Teachers in Vargoniaâ€™s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E. During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
C by elimination (although not convinced about the argument/strength provided by choices).
"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."
The argument indicates that Student/Teacher ratio not to exceed in the schools.
A mentions that Student/Teacher ratio is increasing, In order to maintain the standard ratio, More number of teachers are required........and they cannot be laid of....... thus strengthening the conclusion that the teachers In Virginia wont be laid of during recession.
The argument indicates that Student/Teacher ratio not to exceed in the schools. A mentions that Student/Teacher ratio is increasing, In order to maintain the standard ratio, More number of teachers are required........and they cannot be laid of....... thus strengthening the conclusion that the teachers In Virginia wont be laid of during recession.
What's the OA for this?
I would like to change my option to C. I realised that the student teacher ratio comprasion b/n this recession and the previous recession is of little use.....let alone strengthening....
I was also thinking C but when I read "current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded" in the main stem, then I thought even if now there are 20 % more teachers than those in times of recessions, government can not reduce student-teacher ratio in times of future recessions.