Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 16:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2005, 23:57
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D. Teachers in Vargonia’s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E. During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
_________________

hey ya......

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1071
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 00:28
C by elimination (although not convinced about the argument/strength provided by choices).
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 555
Location: Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 01:51
It has to be B, because when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, which charge substantial fees.

People use to choose schools "free of charge", if their economical situation alters.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 79
Location: Hong Kong
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 02:53
The answer choices are not easy to understand. Had to read it more than once... change my answers a few times...

finally, I go with C.
B is possible but requires us to infer more than neccessary.
C gives a similar scenario of a previous recession. Sets a precedent.

Last edited by vic on 24 Dec 2005, 09:13, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 08:51
I would go with A.

The argument indicates that Student/Teacher ratio not to exceed in the schools.
A mentions that Student/Teacher ratio is increasing, In order to maintain the standard ratio, More number of teachers are required........and they cannot be laid of....... thus strengthening the conclusion that the teachers In Virginia wont be laid of during recession.

What's the OA for this?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1709
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 08:54
It should be 'C'.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 09:04
Kishore wrote:
I would go with A.

The argument indicates that Student/Teacher ratio not to exceed in the schools.
A mentions that Student/Teacher ratio is increasing, In order to maintain the standard ratio, More number of teachers are required........and they cannot be laid of....... thus strengthening the conclusion that the teachers In Virginia wont be laid of during recession.

What's the OA for this?


I would like to change my option to C. I realised that the student teacher ratio comprasion b/n this recession and the previous recession is of little use.....let alone strengthening....
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 09:57
OA is C.
_________________

hey ya......

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 555
Location: Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 12:11
Have read too much in it. :cry:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2005, 16:10
nakib77 wrote:
OA is C.


Nakib, whats the OE?

I was also thinking C but when I read "current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded" in the main stem, then I thought even if now there are 20 % more teachers than those in times of recessions, government can not reduce student-teacher ratio in times of future recessions.

Can anybody explain??
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

  [#permalink] 24 Dec 2005, 16:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic bkk145 9 11 Oct 2007, 07:10
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic ricokevin 11 16 Apr 2007, 00:18
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic okdongdong 6 10 Aug 2005, 02:56
In general , jobs are harder to get in times of economic src 3 06 Aug 2005, 19:46
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic nocilis 22 10 Mar 2005, 22:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.