In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 17:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Status: Apps time!
Joined: 05 Oct 2012
Posts: 25
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GPA: 3.72
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [2] , given: 2

In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 08:36
2
KUDOS
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (02:47) correct 52% (01:32) wrong based on 575 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new lowfat oil to cook its Fast Fries, instead of the less healthful corn oil that it had been using. Now Fastfood King is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt sales of Fast Fries. However, this claim is incorrect, since according to Fastfood King’s own sales figures, Fastfood King sold 10 percent more Fast Fries last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Fastfood King's claim?

A) Total sales of all foods at Fastfood King’s locations increased by less than 10 percent last year.
B) Fastfood King enjoys higher profit margins on its Soft Drinks than it does on Fast Fries.
C) Fastfood King’s customers prefer the taste of Fast Fries cooked in corn oil to Fast Fries cooked in lowfat oil.
D) The number of customers that visited Fastfood King locations was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
E) The year before last, Fastfood King experienced a 20 percent increase in Fast Fries sales over the previous year.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1231
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 116

Kudos [?]: 1388 [2] , given: 116

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 12:06
2
KUDOS
Fastfood King claims that their sales had been hurt by the change. The argument says that the claim was not true as the sales had increased by 10%. If the sales of other items had increased by 20% ( or anything more than 10%) then fastfood king could have a valid argument that sales had been hurt because sales of this product had not increased as much as it had for other products.

A clearly provides a solution and hence answer is A.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 29
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 14

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 19:33
MacFauz wrote:
Fastfood King claims that their sales had been hurt by the change. The argument says that the claim was not true as the sales had increased by 10%. If the sales of other items had increased by 20% ( or anything more than 10%) then fastfood king could have a valid argument that sales had been hurt because sales of this product had not increased as much as it had for other products.

A clearly provides a solution and hence answer is A.

Hi Fauz

Shouldn't it be E? The oil used to cook fries has been changed. E clearly points out that the growth in sales after the change in oil has dropped from 20% to 10%. Further the claims made by Fast Food King and by examiner relate to the sale of fries only and not to the total sales of the restaurant.

What do you think?
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 368
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 369 [0], given: 50

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 21:04
harkabir wrote:
MacFauz wrote:
Fastfood King claims that their sales had been hurt by the change. The argument says that the claim was not true as the sales had increased by 10%. If the sales of other items had increased by 20% ( or anything more than 10%) then fastfood king could have a valid argument that sales had been hurt because sales of this product had not increased as much as it had for other products.

A clearly provides a solution and hence answer is A.

Hi Fauz

Shouldn't it be E? The oil used to cook fries has been changed. E clearly points out that the growth in sales after the change in oil has dropped from 20% to 10%. Further the claims made by Fast Food King and by examiner relate to the sale of fries only and not to the total sales of the restaurant.

What do you think?

E is not within the scope of argument. Its talking about "year before last year" not about last year.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 29
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 14

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 21:08
SOURH7WK wrote:
harkabir wrote:
MacFauz wrote:
Fastfood King claims that their sales had been hurt by the change. The argument says that the claim was not true as the sales had increased by 10%. If the sales of other items had increased by 20% ( or anything more than 10%) then fastfood king could have a valid argument that sales had been hurt because sales of this product had not increased as much as it had for other products.

A clearly provides a solution and hence answer is A.

Hi Fauz

Shouldn't it be E? The oil used to cook fries has been changed. E clearly points out that the growth in sales after the change in oil has dropped from 20% to 10%. Further the claims made by Fast Food King and by examiner relate to the sale of fries only and not to the total sales of the restaurant.

What do you think?

E is not within the scope of argument. Its talking about "year before last year" not about last year.

2010-2011 (year before last) - sales grew by 20% over 2009-2010
2011 Jan (last year Jan) - oil changed
2011-2012 - sales grew by 10% over 2010-2011

Do you think this is incorrect
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 368
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 369 [0], given: 50

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 21:55
harkabir wrote:
Fastfood King claims that their sales had been hurt by the change. The argument says that the claim was not true as the sales had increased by 10%. If the sales of other items had increased by 20% ( or anything more than 10%) then fastfood king could have a valid argument that sales had been hurt because sales of this product had not increased as much as it had for other products.

A clearly provides a solution and hence answer is A.

Hi Fauz

Shouldn't it be E? The oil used to cook fries has been changed. E clearly points out that the growth in sales after the change in oil has dropped from 20% to 10%. Further the claims made by Fast Food King and by examiner relate to the sale of fries only and not to the total sales of the restaurant.

What do you think?
E is not within the scope of argument. Its talking about "year before last year" not about last year.

2010-2011 (year before last) - sales grew by 20% over 2009-2010
2011 Jan (last year Jan) - oil changed
2011-2012 - sales grew by 10% over 2010-2011

Do you think this is incorrect

Yes ur thinking is correct. Now the argument is : 2011 Jan (last year Jan) - oil changed----->2011-2012 - sales grew by 10% over 2010-2011

So does this line "2010-2011 (year before last) - sales grew by 20% over 2009-2010" gives us any insight why/how sales increased in 2011-2012. What information u can derive from this which can make u believe that "Yes Fast Fries sales increased by 10% in 2011-2012.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1231
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 116

Kudos [?]: 1388 [0], given: 116

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2012, 23:01
Correct. However, to be blunt, we do not care about the statistics between the year before the last and the last year. We are only concerned about this year and the last year.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 29
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 14

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2012, 03:42
SOURH7WK wrote:
harkabir wrote:
Fastfood King claims that their sales had been hurt by the change. The argument says that the claim was not true as the sales had increased by 10%. If the sales of other items had increased by 20% ( or anything more than 10%) then fastfood king could have a valid argument that sales had been hurt because sales of this product had not increased as much as it had for other products.

A clearly provides a solution and hence answer is A.

Hi Fauz

Shouldn't it be E? The oil used to cook fries has been changed. E clearly points out that the growth in sales after the change in oil has dropped from 20% to 10%. Further the claims made by Fast Food King and by examiner relate to the sale of fries only and not to the total sales of the restaurant.

What do you think?
E is not within the scope of argument. Its talking about "year before last year" not about last year.

2010-2011 (year before last) - sales grew by 20% over 2009-2010
2011 Jan (last year Jan) - oil changed
2011-2012 - sales grew by 10% over 2010-2011

Do you think this is incorrect

Yes ur thinking is correct. Now the argument is : 2011 Jan (last year Jan) - oil changed----->2011-2012 - sales grew by 10% over 2010-2011

So does this line "2010-2011 (year before last) - sales grew by 20% over 2009-2010" gives us any insight why/how sales increased in 2011-2012. What information u can derive from this which can make u believe that "Yes Fast Fries sales increased by 10% in 2011-2012.

I apologize, I thought this was a strengthen rathen than weaken question. Yes in case of weaken the answer is clearly A. Thanks for your effort
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 9

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 10:29
nitzz wrote:
In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new lowfat oil to cook its Fast Fries, instead of the less healthful corn oil that it had been using. Now Fastfood King is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt sales of Fast Fries. However, this claim is incorrect, since according to Fastfood King’s own sales figures, Fastfood King sold 10 percent more Fast Fries last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Fastfood King's claim?

A) Total sales of all foods at Fastfood King’s locations increased by less than 10 percent last year.
B) Fastfood King enjoys higher profit margins on its Soft Drinks than it does on Fast Fries.
C) Fastfood King’s customers prefer the taste of Fast Fries cooked in corn oil to Fast Fries cooked in lowfat oil.
D) The number of customers that visited Fastfood King locations was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
E) The year before last, Fastfood King experienced a 20 percent increase in Fast Fries sales over the previous year.

Am I the only one who thinks this problem was worded poorly? The stem says what most strongly supports the argument against fastfood king's claim. FFK said that sales went down and the claims AGAINST it said that FFK sales actually rose. IMO, D says that not only did sales rise, but customers went up as well, so that claim is invalid. Am I missing something?
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my post useful, I give kudos back

Intern
Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 17:42
Should it be D. FFK claimed new oil for sales reduction. The argument pointed out sales up. And customer like new taste
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 175

Kudos [?]: 1335 [0], given: 62

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2012, 21:58
Can you guys please clear my doubt.
A states that total sales increased by LESS than 10% last year. It means that the sales can grow o.00001% or 9.99% as well. We can't be so sure about that.
E states that the rate if growth in sales was hurt. Doesn't this statement means that the sales were hurt.
Please let me know if I am missing something.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 16
Schools: Anderson '15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 8

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 05:49
Hi Marcab, i did the same analysis and selected E and couldnt convince myself that A is the correct ans.

Finally realized that trick is in the Q, most of us ended up supporting the wrong conclusion.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Fastfood King's claim?
We need to support this argument --- fastfood sales were not hurt on french fries by change in plan
A-supports this well saying all product sales increase were less than 10 % whereas french fries sale was more than 10%.
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 57
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 12

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2013, 10:43
I have chosen option "B"
but then after looking at MacFauz explaantion realized option is indeed "A"
okay if i now eliminate option "B" and my reasoning is:
"The number of customers that visited Fastfood King locations was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before."

the above bold version can be implied that people visited location but not necessarily ordered fries.
will it be correct line of reasoning?
Current Student
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 939
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 134

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 546

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2014, 08:04
WarriorGmat wrote:
I have chosen option "B"
but then after looking at MacFauz explaantion realized option is indeed "A"
okay if i now eliminate option "B" and my reasoning is:
"The number of customers that visited Fastfood King locations was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before."

the above bold version can be implied that people visited location but not necessarily ordered fries.
will it be correct line of reasoning?

Yes, the argument takes the premise "Fastfood King sold 10 percent more Fast Fries last year than in the previous year". So we are talking about sales and not foot falls.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Prodigy for Tepper - CMU : http://bit.ly/cmuloan-kd

Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2014
Posts: 22
Schools: HEC Montreal '16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2014, 15:37
The question stem itself mentions about fast foods sales reduction , does that means fast food officials can be considered lying about sales figure, don,t we have have we have to consider all in the stem to be true.hence i went for d, please can anyone elaborate on this
Current Student
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 939
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 134

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 546

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2014, 07:56
manishgmat1 wrote:
The question stem itself mentions about fast foods sales reduction , does that means fast food officials can be considered lying about sales figure, don,t we have have we have to consider all in the stem to be true.hence i went for d, please can anyone elaborate on this

The question is which option goes against the Fast food's claim. You can take the other premise as true but not the conclusion of the Fast Food chain.

We need to find option that suggest the claim is not correct.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Prodigy for Tepper - CMU : http://bit.ly/cmuloan-kd

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 24

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2014, 23:36
I went for D because the question is to find the statement that " supports the argument against Fastfood King's claim".

Fastfood King claimed that their sales was hurting. Shouldn't A be a strengthener to their claim?
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 394
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 271 [2] , given: 139

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2014, 23:26
2
KUDOS
A nice and clear A...All sales went down except that of FF...The new oil is definitely not to be blamed here
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..

Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
WE: Project Management (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2015, 09:17
Can anyone make me clear or tell where my reasoning is wrong?

The claim says about the sales of Fast Fries product, it does not compare it to those of others. So to decide if Fast Fries's sales was hurt or not, its should be compared with that before change. I found A only implies Fast Fries's sales in relation with overall sales of FFK, it can not be the answer.

Thanks!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2016, 23:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new   [#permalink] 11 Jul 2016, 23:05

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new 11 11 Apr 2010, 00:55
In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new 5 18 Aug 2009, 12:11
In January of last year, Fastfood King started using a new 2 31 Jul 2008, 19:10
5 In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie 11 10 Feb 2008, 04:50
55 In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie 32 28 Aug 2007, 04:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by