Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2016, 11:12
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1629
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 739 [0], given: 2

In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2010, 08:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (02:14) correct 19% (01:54) wrong based on 132 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not do highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a tendency that has normally been taken to show that aging carries with it a loss of creative capacity. However, by the age of forty most scientists have been working in their chosen field for at least fifteen years, so an alternative
explanation is that spending too long in a single field reduces the opportunity for creative thought. Investigating which of the following would be most useful in choosing between the competing explanations described above?

A. Whether among those scientists who do highly creative work beyond age forty a large proportion entered their field at an age considerably later age than is common.
B. Whether scientists’ choice of research projects tends to be influenced by their own belief that their most creative work will be done relatively early in their career.
C. Whether scientists who are older than forty tend to find more satisfaction in other activities, such as teaching and mentoring than they do in pursuing their own research.
D. Whether funding agencies are more inclined to award research grants to scientists who are veterans in their field than to scientists who are relative newcomers.
E. Whether there is a significant variation among scientific fields in the average age at which scientists working in those fields are at their most productive.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 994
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 643 [1] , given: 36

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2010, 09:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
P1: Many scientists do not do highly creative work after age 40
P2 : Scientists beyond 40 yrs would have spend 15 years or more in their fields. Spending too long in a particular field reduces the opportunity for creative thought.

Assumption : Most scientists who are creative entered their fields before age 40.

This argument ignores a vital point that if the scientists entered their field after age 40, they still be creative. They entered late in that field hence did not spent much time in that field. So there is still room for creative thought. Investigation of this point is vital in evaluating the argument.

A. Whether among those scientists who do highly creative work beyond age forty
a large proportion entered their field at an age considerably later age than is
common. >>> Answer
B. Whether scientists’ choice of research projects tends to be influenced by their
own belief that their most creative work will be done relatively early in their
career. >> Choice of the project has no bearing
C. Whether scientists who are older than forty tend to find more satisfaction in
other activities, such as teaching and mentoring than they do in pursuing their
own research. >> Irrelevant. Whether they find satisfaction in OTHER fields is just a scope shift.
D. Whether funding agencies are more inclined to award research grants to
scientists who are veterans in their field than to scientists who are relative
newcomers. >> Irrelevant. Funding for research is not an issue
E. Whether there is a significant variation among scientific fields in the average
age at which scientists working in those fields are at their most productive. >> Irrelevant. The effects of scientific fields has no bearing on the argument

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Affiliations: USMA
Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Posts: 21
Location: DC
Schools: Columbia, NYU, Dartmouth, Darden
WE 1: Army
WE 2: Consultant
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 12

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2010, 10:35
Pretty straight forward to me actually.

Identified it was a strengthen question.

Identified that argument that B/C scientists spend a lot of time in their field, we can conclude that they have limited creative thought.

Prephrase - find some scientist who switched fields after 40? Was he creative?

A is similar - basically scientist entered at a later age.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 194
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2010, 00:17
A for me ........just wasted 2 mins seeing other options ...what a waste of time
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 11

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2010, 21:21
I pick A.

I'm right.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 3

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2010, 21:37
IMO A
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1559
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 436 [0], given: 6

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2010, 20:34
A it is.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 98
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2010, 23:20
A for me too. how to quickly confirm an answer beside reading all the other options? some of the other options prompted me to doubt my answer. :(
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 52
Schools: LBS, Harvard, Booth, Stanford, ISB, NTU
WE 1: S/W Engineer
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 15

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2010, 10:49
OG Question. couldn't think! :D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 312
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 379 [0], given: 20

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2010, 06:18
I picked B. Shame ! :(
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 10

Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2010, 02:41
IMO A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 24

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2010, 01:54
Straightforward!!
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TheLaptopSkinVault
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/LaptopSkinVault

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 1614
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.56
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 104

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2016, 19:33
noboru wrote:
In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not do highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a tendency that has normally been taken to show that aging carries with it a loss of creative capacity. However, by the age of forty most scientists have been working in their chosen field for at least fifteen years, so an alternative
explanation is that spending too long in a single field reduces the opportunity for creative thought. Investigating which of the following would be most useful in choosing between the competing explanations described above?

A. Whether among those scientists who do highly creative work beyond age forty a large proportion entered their field at an age considerably later age than is common.
B. Whether scientists’ choice of research projects tends to be influenced by their own belief that their most creative work will be done relatively early in their career.
C. Whether scientists who are older than forty tend to find more satisfaction in other activities, such as teaching and mentoring than they do in pursuing their own research.
D. Whether funding agencies are more inclined to award research grants to scientists who are veterans in their field than to scientists who are relative newcomers.
E. Whether there is a significant variation among scientific fields in the average age at which scientists working in those fields are at their most productive.


difficult to comprehend..easy to crack..
only A discusses the subject...
B - belief of the scientists is out of scope
C - satisfaction is out of scope
D - funding agencies preference is out of scope
E - variation in different fields of the average age is irrelevant.
Re: In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not   [#permalink] 04 Mar 2016, 19:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic It is generally agreed by scientists that the naturally vinayparamanand 6 20 Aug 2013, 06:53
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of TomB 0 01 Nov 2009, 03:34
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of nitindas 0 13 Mar 2010, 13:32
22 Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of prasannar 20 16 Mar 2008, 08:03
Scientists typically do their most creative work before the Swagatalakshmi 8 26 Nov 2006, 18:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In many scientific disciplines, scientists generally do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.