In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 08:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 457
Location: Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 20

In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2012, 09:39
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:47) correct 44% (01:03) wrong based on 276 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wardsville, the lumber company in the summer of 1994 responded to hundreds of angry residents requiring that it should pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

A requiring that it should
B requiring it to
C and their requirement to
D who required it to
E who required for it to
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by fameatop on 21 Sep 2013, 02:35, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2012, 11:26
I feel B
but i fear they will be a case of either subjunctive mood or idiomatic usage involved.
Any expert help ?
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 912
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 603 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2012, 20:12
mandyrhtdm wrote:
I feel B
but i fear they will be a case of either subjunctive mood or idiomatic usage involved.
Any expert help ?

The problem totally about idiom. Choice D is better than B, which set the verb require into "requiring" that makes more than one meaning in term of tense.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3633
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5573 [0], given: 322

Re: The lumber company in the summer of 1994 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2012, 21:24
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In B, the modifier – requiring ……. - is an adverbial present participial phrase, just modifying the preceding noun -residents-; Actually the adverbial should be used only when you want to modify a verb or the entire preceding clause and in such cases, we should set it off with commas. On the contrary, when you want to pinpoint a noun very restrictively, then we should use a restrictive pronouns such as - who or that - in order to punch the nail straight on the noun. That is the reason that D is superior in terms of usage
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 26
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Date: 05-13-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 18

Re: The lumber company in the summer of 1994 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2012, 21:41
Hi,

In answer D 'Who' refers to the Angry Residents.... Angry residents in the clause is the object.....so should it not be Whom rather than Who?

Regards
Ankit Bansal
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1996
Followers: 2086

Kudos [?]: 7168 [1] , given: 267

Re: The lumber company in the summer of 1994 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2012, 13:21
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
ankitbansal85 wrote:
Hi,

In answer D 'Who' refers to the Angry Residents.... Angry residents in the clause is the object.....so should it not be Whom rather than Who?

Regards
Ankit Bansal

Hi Ankit,

The action “required” is done by “hundreds of local residents”. They are the ones “who” did the action of requiring something. Therefore, use of “who” is correct in Choice D.

Now take a look at this sentence:

In the mall, I ran into Joe whom I met after three years.

In this sentence, “who” did the action of meeting? “I” did. But “whom” did I meet? I met Joe.

Notice that the subject of the “who” clause in the original sentence is “hundreds of angry residents”, the performer of the action. In the simple example sentence, “Joe” is the object of the main clause while both the actions are performed by "I". That is why he is referred to by “whom”.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 115 [0], given: 813

Re: The lumber company in the summer of 1994 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 20:33
I wish more experts comment on the difference between B and D.
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 115 [2] , given: 813

Re: The lumber company in the summer of 1994 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 20:47
2
KUDOS
above quetion is not good. it maybe repeat the following

In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of marketing, the Coca-Cola company in July 1985 yielded to thousands of irate consumers demanding that it should bring back the original Coke formula.

A) demanding that it should
B )demanding it to
C )and their demand to
D )who demanded that it
E) who demanded it to

this is from og10 which is NOT recommended because gmat now focus on meaning not focus on only idioms.

oa is D because "demand" require "that+clause".

the origianal posting is not good. "require" can be used in the pattern "require that +clause" or "require somebody to do something" /

this mean both B and D are correct. I do not study this question.
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 11

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 09:19
than. I also have the same view. What is wrong with B. Am I missing something here??
Manager
Status: SLOGGING : My son says,This time Papa u will have to make it : Innocence is BLISS
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 210
Location: India
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 53 [1] , given: 30

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 11:12
1
KUDOS
Daagh has neatly shared his pointers and Guess we all second him. Will just add my friendly dimes :

Let's draw an analogy :

B : Daagh responded to Thang......... Requesting him to clear the maze

D : Daagh responded to Thang.......... Who requested him to clear the maze

which one would u zone in on ?

Guess D : as it clearly indicates ------ Thang had some problem with the Q ---- Thang requested Daagh to clear the maze -------- And Daagh responded to Thang : The logical flow stays intact

C : Does it at all sound correct ( apart from the fact that +ing modifier Requiring incorrectly modifies the closest noun Residents whereas it should be preceeded by a comma and should be aptly modifying the preceeding clause )
Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 61
Schools: NTU '16 (A)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 39

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2013, 10:21
Requiring is the present participle form. So, it should modify the preceding noun i.e residents. So there is no modifier error.

Why must we eliminate B ?
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 898
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 1047 [0], given: 543

In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2013, 00:06
In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wardsville, the lumber company in the summer of 1994 responded to hundreds of angry residents requiring that it should pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

A requiring that it should
B requiring it to
C and their requirement to
D who required it to
E who required for it to

What is the referrent for "it"

Grockit
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Last edited by Zarrolou on 09 May 2013, 00:07, edited 1 time in total.
Merging similar topics
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1445
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 301

Kudos [?]: 1246 [1] , given: 816

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2013, 02:17
1
KUDOS
fozzzy wrote:
In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wardsville, the lumber company in the summer of 1994 responded to hundreds of angry residents requiring that it should pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

A requiring that it should
B requiring it to
C and their requirement to
D who required it to
E who required for it to

What is the referrent for "it"

Grockit

I believe "it" can refer only to the lumber company as the "hundreds of angry residents" is plural

On the hindsight, i think that "required" can only be used because it is and action which preceeded responded so has to be in the past tense.
Hence the option A B C are ruled out, leaving us with D and E and of the two, D is more appropriate.
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Director
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 617
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 9

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2013, 03:14
12bhang wrote:
Requiring is the present participle form. So, it should modify the preceding noun i.e residents. So there is no modifier error.

Why must we eliminate B ?

As a poster has noted above, this seems to be rip-off from an older OG question. However, in the process, the creator of this question curiously changed the correct option D. In the original sentence, it was: who demanded that it (this is a subjunctive construction), while in this question option D is: who required it to (this is a non-subjunctive construction).

Now, require is a funny word. It can take both: subjunctive and non-subjunctive format. But here is the funnier thing. Just because require can take both: subjunctive and non-subjunctive, does not mean that both of these would be correct in any given situation. Let’s look at a couple of correct sentences to understand this further:

1. A plural subject requires a plural verb for a correct sentence.
2. Residents required that the lumber company pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

#1 above is non-subjunctive while #2 is subjunctive. Let us now change # 2 to:

3. Residents required the lumber company to pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

If you look at this closely, this sentence is not optimal, because an illogical meaning that can be interpreted from this is that residents wanted to pay restitution for selling faulty boards, and for this, the residents required the lumber company!! (Think about it this way: Residents required money to pay restitution for selling faulty boards; now just substitute money with the lumber company).

So, in short, the correct sentence is #2 (and not #3), because there is an ambiguity in meaning in #3. At least if there is an option that does have the structure mentioned in #2, it would be preferable.

In this case, while option D in the OG question had a choice similar to #2, this question under consideration changes option D.

This, by the way, also underscores a similar problem in option B of the sentence under consideration (residents did not require the lumber company as B suggests; residents required something from the lumber company).

In fact, test takers would be advised to understand this concept well, since this will become increasingly important, given GMAT’s recent thrust on meaning related questions.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2013
Posts: 5
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2014, 08:06
In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wardsville, the lumber company in the summer of 1994 responded to hundreds of angry residents requiring that it should pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

a) requiring that it should
B) requiring it to
C) and their requirement to
D) who required it to
E) who required for it to

Source : Grockit

Last edited by carcass on 25 Mar 2014, 11:37, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the title of the question
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 3

Re: Wardsville lumber company|sentence correction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2014, 08:53
In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wardsville, the lumber company in the summer of 1994 responded to hundreds of angry residents requiring that it should pay restitution for selling faulty boards.

a) requiring that it should
B) requiring it to
C) and their requirement to
D) who required it to
E) who required for it to

i will go with D .
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 481
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 10

Re: Wardsville lumber company|sentence correction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2014, 11:09
+1 D.

makes sense for me at least
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Current Student
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 311
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 28

Kudos [?]: 391 [1] , given: 142

Re: Wardsville lumber company|sentence correction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2014, 11:10
1
KUDOS
in-one-of-the-most-surprising-decisions-in-the-history-of-135572.html
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire

Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3092
Followers: 786

Kudos [?]: 6543 [0], given: 1012

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2014, 11:38

Merged similar topic

regards
_________________
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10538
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Feb 2016, 16:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of   [#permalink] 29 Feb 2016, 16:41
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of Wa 0 25 Mar 2014, 11:38
2 In one of the most surprising decisions in the history of 6 04 Apr 2013, 12:26
2 In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of 7 31 Oct 2010, 11:57
27 In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of 22 03 Nov 2009, 09:55
In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of 7 26 Aug 2008, 07:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by