|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
In order to pressure the government of Country S to become [#permalink]
21 Jan 2006, 23:54
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In order to pressure the government of Country S to become less repressive, some legislators in Country R want to ban all exports from R to S. Companies in R that manufacture telecommunication equipment such as telephones and fax machines have argued that exports of their products should be exempted from the ban, on the ground that it is impossible for a country to remain repressive when telecommunication equipment is widely available to the population of that country.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument given by the manufacturers depends?
(A) The government of S has recently increased the amount of telecommunication equipment it allows to be imported into the country.
(B) The telecommunication equipment that would be imported into S if the exemption were to be granted would not be available solely to top development officials in S.
(C) A majority of the members of R’s legislature do not favor exempting telecommunication equipment from the ban on exports to Country S.
(D) Of all exports that could be sent to Country S, telecommunication equipment would be the most effective in helping citizens of S oppose that country’s repressive government.
(E) Without pressure from Country R, the government of S would be able to continue repressing its citizens indefinitely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
B for me
negate it and it says that the telecom would be available only wiht top officials in S, thus repressiveness cant be reduced
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1079
Location: USA
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
B should do the trick.
Conclusion: If telecom eqipment is available to the "population of the country", the govt cannot be repressive. Define population.
If population = Govt officials only; Then the argument of telecom people is in trouble.
_________________
"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."
- Bernard Edmonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 77
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
B it is.
Now I used negation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I'd like to know why D couldn't be the answer, since it states that telecom equipment is the most effective in helping citizens oppose that government. The manufacturer says that their equipment would be widely available to the population (i.e., referring to the citizens)
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1134
Location: India
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 1
|
giddi77 wrote: B should do the trick.
Conclusion: If telecom eqipment is available to the "population of the country", the govt cannot be repressive. Define population. If population = Govt officials only; Then the argument of telecom people is in trouble.
Great explaination.
B it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 732
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
D for me
_________________
IE IMBA 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 23
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 36
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
B for me.
Telecommunications equipment doesn't necessarily have to be the most effective in helping citizens of S oppose that country’s repressive government.
You have to able to assume every single word in the correct answer choice, and the language in D seems too strong.
OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 0
|
Must be B.
negate B and argument falls apart.
_________________
SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Vow!! Good Question. B is tricky.
I first went for D. But, later came to B.
I think that D is not a mandatory assumption. It says that telecommunication equipment is the most effective to deal with repression. But, there could be other equipment who also deal with repression. We could exempt them too. But, we need to exempt telecommunication equipment because it reaches masses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Location: Russia, Moscow
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I picked B
I rejected D because the argument of equipment manufacturers stresses equipment's availability to the population and not its effectiveness in fighting repression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|