Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 15:53 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 15:53

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [13]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11169
Own Kudos [?]: 31890 [2]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
plogod wrote:
My problem with A is that the corn syrup may have been more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax. How can we just assume they are nearly the same?

Posted from my mobile device


Lets explore option (A)

Quote:
The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.


Let Price of sugar cane juice prior to imposition of taxes be $10/unit
Quantity required for production of one soft drink be 5 units
So, prior to imposition of taxes cost of production of one soft drink using sugar cane juice is $ 50

Government imposes say 10% tax (say)

Price of sugar cane juice after imposition of taxes will be $11/unit
Quantity required for production of one soft drink be 5 units
So, prior to imposition of taxes cost of production of one soft drink using sugar cane juice is $ 55

Quote:
Since cost has increased soft drink companies of the country decide to use corn syrup instead of sugar cane juice to maintain cost same.


Here I assume 2 things -

1. Quantity of syrup required for production of one soft drink doesn't change.
2. Cost of sugar cane per unit will be at most equal to the cost of sugar cane juice prior to imposition of tax.

Cost of corn syrup prior to imposition of taxes be $10/unit
Quantity required for production of one soft drink be 5 units
So, prior to imposition of taxes cost of production of one soft drink using sugar cane juice is $ 50

Now go to option (A) once again -

Quote:
The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.


Check carefully this clearly matches our assumptions highlighted in red and blue above, hence (A) is correct.

Now the last part , your query -

My problem with A is that the corn syrup may have been more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax. How can we just assume they are nearly the same?

The stimulus states -

Quote:
all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.


If we assume that cost of corn syrup is more expensive than more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax, then the soft drink companies would not be able to maintain their cost structures same and the entire argument of switching to corn sugar from sugar cane juice falls apart.

Hope this helps, please feel free to revert in case of any doubt.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
Quote:
The stimulus states -

Quote:
all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.


If we assume that cost of corn syrup is more expensive than more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax, then the soft drink companies would not be able to maintain their cost structures same and the entire argument of switching to corn sugar from sugar cane juice falls apart.

Hope this helps, please feel free to revert in case of any doubt.



I originally figured the answer was (D) because if the companies switched ingredients right after the import tax was raised, they would had to have assumed they could use corn syrup as a substitute before the tax was in place. While possible, this is somewhat speculative.

Now that you highlight the "to maintain their cost structures" part, I can see why (A) makes sense. To keep the same cost structure, the price of the substitute product used per soft drink would need to equal the price of the original product used per soft drink.

Thanks!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2018
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 144
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
The reason A prevails over E is because in inference we have to support DIRECTLY the conclusion with the given premises.
Thus we CAN'T MAKE ANY ASSUMPTION in addition to what is provided.

E to be true needs the assumption that price increase is due to the offer (represented by import and internal production) reduction and not to demand increase.

A instead is DIRECTLY supported by premises
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2022
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
plogod wrote:
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.


In A:
What if corn syrup was way expensive than cane juice prior to the imposition of tax and the tax increased the cost of cane juice significantly such that it exceeded the cost of corn syrup. It is possible that the companies can maintain their costs by using the corn syrup since no information regarding it is given in the argument. Maybe, before the imposition of taxes, companies used cane juice just because of its low price. They could have maintained their costs if they used corn syrup.

Am I missing something here?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
KarishmaB
whenever in the stimulus it says to maintain cost it means the same cost as previous cost.
Also can you give reasoning for option E
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64900 [0]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
plogod wrote:
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.


Argument:
Country X imposed a steep tax on all imported cane juice.
Price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply.
So soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to high fructose corn syrup in order to maintain their cost structures.


This means that the soft drink companies, to maintain the same cost of producing soft drinks as before, switched to fructose corn syrup. Then it implies that the cost of making soft drinks did not rise by switching to high fructose corn syrup. So the amount of money required to buy cane juice for each soft drink was the same as the amount to money required to buy high fructose corn syrup for each soft drink. Hence option (A) works.

A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

Correct.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.

Not necessary that the amount imported was higher than domestic production. Say, before tax, domestically 50 million litres of cane juice was produced and 30 million was imported. So the country consumed 80 million litres of cane juice.
After tax, the 30 million litres became very expensive. So shortage happened. Domestic farmers raised their prices too. The end result was that the price of cane juice increased sharply.
Hence these numbers are consistent with our argument.

Is it necessary that if 50 million litres was produced domestically, more than that must have been imported previously? No.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
KarishmaB wrote:
plogod wrote:
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.


Argument:
Country X imposed a steep tax on all imported cane juice.
Price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply.
So soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to high fructose corn syrup in order to maintain their cost structures.


This means that the soft drink companies, to maintain the same cost of producing soft drinks as before, switched to fructose corn syrup. Then it implies that the cost of making soft drinks did not rise by switching to high fructose corn syrup. So the amount of money required to buy cane juice for each soft drink was the same as the amount to money required to buy high fructose corn syrup for each soft drink. Hence option (A) works.

A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

Correct.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.

Not necessary that the amount imported was higher than domestic production. Say, before tax, domestically 50 million litres of cane juice was produced and 30 million was imported. So the country consumed 80 million litres of cane juice.
After tax, the 30 million litres became very expensive. So shortage happened. Domestic farmers raised their prices too. The end result was that the price of cane juice increased sharply.
Hence these numbers are consistent with our argument.

Is it necessary that if 50 million litres was produced domestically, more than that must have been imported previously? No.



Thanks alot Karishma.Your explainations are very good.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne