Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2016, 00:57
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 179 [2] , given: 10

In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2012, 21:07
2
This post received
KUDOS
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

35% (02:17) correct 65% (01:27) wrong based on 1648 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a tax amnesty program that allows tax delinquents to pay all owed tax without added financial penalty. However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments implementing similar programs.
Which of the following, if true, would most contribute to an explanation of the economists’ projections?

A.Tax amnesty programs are only successful if they are widely publicized.

B.Most people who honestly pay their state tax are equally honest in paying their federal tax.

C.Although federal tax delinquents usually must pay high financial penalties, the states require far lower financial penalties.

D. The state tax rate varies considerably from state to state, but the federal tax is levied according to laws which apply to citizens of all the states.

E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Economist GMAT Tutor Discount CodesOptimus Prep Discount Codese-GMAT Discount Codes
5 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [5] , given: 110

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2014, 07:39
5
This post received
KUDOS
i will go with C. Below is the conclusion

However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments implementing similar programs.

Now we need to bear in mind that no amount of tax is pardoned, only penalty is pardoned. Had there been no amnesty program, tax collected will be Original tax + penalty.
Due to amnesty both state and federal govt is going to pardon the penalty.

Only if Federal penalty is higher than state penalty, the total tax collected by federal govt will be less than state govt.
Ans choice C mentions exactly the same thing.

As for E - chosen by around 60% respondents, here is my understanding.

E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.

We are looking for strengthener to conclusion : while E tells the reason for delinquency of federal and state tax..it no way gives us the reason to believe why Federal tax program will collect lesser amount.
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [2] , given: 0

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2013, 22:23
2
This post received
KUDOS
Guys.. I think C makes sense.


C.Although federal tax delinquents usually must pay high financial penalties, the states require far lower financial penalties.

Since federal penalty was high , it was more likely that more people have paid the federal taxes on time .
However, since the penalty on state taxes was low, it was more likely that people might have overlooked or chose not to pay.


Simple reasoning: If the punishment is harsh for a particular crime then that particular crime is committed less frequently.

This implies that state might have more revenue to collect then federal government.
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 804
Followers: 329

Kudos [?]: 635 [2] , given: 5

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2014, 08:02
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
gmihir wrote:
In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a tax amnesty program
that allows tax delinquents to pay all owed tax without added financial penalty.
However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far
lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments
implementing similar programs.Which of the following, if true, would most contribute
to an explanation of the economists’ projections?

A.Tax amnesty programs are only successful if they are widely publicized.

B.Most people who honestly pay their state tax are equally honest in paying their federal tax.

C.Although federal tax delinquents usually must pay high financial penalties, the states require far lower financial penalties.

D. The state tax rate varies considerably from state to state, but the federal tax is levied according to laws which apply to citizens of all the states.

E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.


The answer here is E.

We are trying to strengthen the conclusion that "the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax (not tax + penalties) owed by delinquents (not all tax payers)".

A-Out of Scope
B-Out of Scope (we are looking at delinquents, not honest payers)
C-This would suggest that the federal government would see a higher percentage of tax collection because the benefit of the amnesty is much higher for federal tax than for state taxes
D-Out of Scope
E-The amnesty program for was successful because the unpaid taxes were due to oversight, not unwillingness to pay. Federal tax evasion is due to people fundamentally not wanting to pay tax, period. Saving on penalties does not incentivize people who have decided to not pay any tax.

KW
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 563
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 251 [1] , given: 75

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2012, 06:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
in 1:46 mins
(C) clearly states that the federal penalties were higher than that of the state penalties so the delinquent cases found the offer good enough to repay the federal one.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 612
WE: Science (Education)
Followers: 90

Kudos [?]: 819 [1] , given: 43

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2012, 08:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.

So, I think most tax delinquents don't pay fed taxes because they decide not to, or simply put, don't want to pay.
Those who don't pay state taxes are mostly forgetting to pay, not because they don't want to pay.
Two different attitudes, why should the same method work for both?

I think it is E.
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 126
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.9
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 45

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2013, 08:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
samatace wrote:
gmihir wrote:
In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a tax amnesty program
that allows tax delinquents to pay all owed tax without added financial penalty.
However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far
lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments
implementing similar programs.Which of the following, if true, would most contribute
to an explanation of the economists’ projections?

A.Tax amnesty programs are only successful if they are widely publicized.

B.Most people who honestly pay their state tax are equally honest in paying their federal tax.

C.Although federal tax delinquents usually must pay high financial penalties, the states require far lower financial penalties.

D. The state tax rate varies considerably from state to state, but the federal tax is levied according to laws which apply to citizens of all the states.

E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.


One for E, C does not make sense and is really out of scope. This is just a fact.


IMO its C, if delinquents are not paying for lower penalties in state, they shall certainly not pay for higher penalties in federal taxes.
For E, even if they had an oversight in state taxes, what makes it compelling that they will again have an oversight in Federal Taxes as well?
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2014, 21:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
btw, the OA is E. I found this in the gmat prep practice exam 3. I got it wrong though :(.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2014
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2014, 23:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi,

In this question, we do not know the absolute values of tax owned by Fed and State tax delinquents. The Federal government proposes a penalty exemption program to encourage delinquents to pay the tax they owe and the State government plans a 'similar' program (mentioned in the last line).

Now, the prediction is that the federal government will collect a far lower percentage of tax owned by tax delinquents than the state government will. This implies that the exemption of penalty acts as an incentive to a far lower number of federal tax delinquents than to state tax delinquents. So, according to the prediction, both the state and federal governments plan to implement the exemption of the penalty on tax, but the federal government will recover a far lower percentage of the tax than the state government will.

If higher penalty imposed on federal tax delinquents ever was an incentive then we can reasonably assume that the percentage of federal tax delinquents would be lower than the number of state tax delinquents and that this trend would continue (the percentage of people owing federal tax could even decline) after the implementation of the penalty exemption. However, the prediction that the opposite will occur implies that higher penalty never was an incentive and therefore, (C) is immaterial.

So, what other factor could be at play? Even after the exemption of penalty at both federal and state government, the federal government expects to recover a far smaller percentage of tax from delinquents than the state government does. (E) justifies this - higher penalty or not, tax exemption or not, the federal tax delinquents do not pay tax because they do not WISH to pay tax - therefore, there is very little probability that a penalty exemption will encourage them to pay.

This should help!
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 804
Followers: 329

Kudos [?]: 635 [1] , given: 5

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2016, 06:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
happyface101 - Your reasoning above isn't bad, but you are falling into a common CR trap: gross amounts v. proportions. Your argument could potential be viable if we were talking about gross amount (but even then you have to consider the scale of the entire government v. a single state). The argument, however, states that economists believe that "the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax owed", so it doesn't matter that there may be FEWER tax evaders due to the high penalties involved because we are comparing the proportion collected of total tax owed.

Remember also that we are looking for the BEST answer. Many times in CR you will be faced with multiple answers that seem correct. When you find that you have chosen incorrectly, your job is not to try and justify your answer; rather, you need to go back and teach yourself why the correct answer is correct. Try it! Now that you know that E is the correct answer, analyze it logically to determine why it is the best answer.

KW
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 804
Followers: 329

Kudos [?]: 635 [1] , given: 5

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2016, 06:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Dienekes wrote:
Considering I got this as the first question on GMAT Prep test #3, I was wondering can actual GMAT too put a 700-level question as the first one? I got it right, though took >2 mins to solve.


It would be a bit surprising to see a really hard one at the start of the GMAT as that would go against the general algorithm of the CAT (see this article on MBA.com: http://www.mba.com/us/the-gmat-blog-hub ... -gmat.aspx). That said, the GMAT mixes things up all the time so it's wouldn't be out of the question for them to alter the structure a bit without changing how the exam works overall. The basic gameplan of the GMAT stays the same - don't spend too long on any problem, even if it is the first problem you see!

KW
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1713
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 89

Kudos [?]: 794 [0], given: 109

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2012, 22:31
Are you sure that the OA is C? IMO, it is E.

The federal government will receive less money than the states because the deliquents don't want to pay federal taxes.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2012, 22:44
E should be it IMO..fact undermining C has been provided in the argument..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 31

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2012, 23:02
E should be it. C is irrelevant
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 10

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2012, 23:24
thanks guys for confirming, i also had marked E , C makes little sense..just wanted to have a second opinion, to make sure i haven't missed anything, thanks again! :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 54
Location: Ukraine
Schools: LBS '14 (M)
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
WE: Corporate Finance (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 7

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2012, 06:15
gmihir wrote:
thanks guys for confirming, i also had marked E , C makes little sense..just wanted to have a second opinion, to make sure i haven't missed anything, thanks again! :)


Please change the official answer in your first post.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2012, 09:56
Yes... C makes no sense at all....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2012
Posts: 97
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GRE 1: 2170 Q800 V700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 15

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2012, 09:26
hi all,

Though i selected E too, after looking at the answer i am little confused now.

In E, it is mentioned that the state tax deliquents are usually those who dont pay because of oversight. if that were true, a state tax amnesty program wouldnt have any special benefit because those people would have paid either way without needing any additional incentives. Hence, there is no reason why a federal program would be less successful than a state one.

Am i wrong in my approach? Can someone clarify pls? :|
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 195
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 7

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2012, 20:59
tsheshraj wrote:
hi all,

Though i selected E too, after looking at the answer i am little confused now.

In E, it is mentioned that the state tax deliquents are usually those who dont pay because of oversight. if that were true, a state tax amnesty program wouldnt have any special benefit because those people would have paid either way without needing any additional incentives. Hence, there is no reason why a federal program would be less successful than a state one.

Am i wrong in my approach? Can someone clarify pls? :|


This argument is assuming that people who forgot to pay state taxes would be reminded and encouraged by state amnesty program to pay Taxes without penalty. Because these people didn't want to default on State Taxes, would pay the taxes more easily than people who defaulted on Federal Taxes.
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-guide-to-the-official-guide-13-for-gmat-review-134210.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 22

Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2012, 02:34
After spending more than 5 minutes on this question, I am convinced that the answer is E.
Great question.
Re: In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a   [#permalink] 23 May 2012, 02:34

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 53 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Og 2016 Q3 A provincial government plans to raise the gasoline tax harishbiyani8888 1 01 Sep 2015, 10:29
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic In order to raise revenue, the federal government souvik101990 4 01 Jul 2015, 13:30
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic 2016 OG Q3 - A provincial government plans to raise LithiumIon 11 13 Jun 2015, 09:25
In order to increase revenues, an airport plans to change raghavs 6 02 Apr 2010, 00:51
37 In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a mymba99 21 04 May 2008, 12:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.