Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Feb 2016, 20:31
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 151
WE 1: 4 years in IT
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 126 [1] , given: 7

In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2010, 23:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
23
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

36% (02:09) correct 64% (02:16) wrong based on 859 sessions
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall. In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.

If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City
A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910
C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2010, 03:54
Is there any error with answer A? According to my logic, it should be "The number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1910 than in 1900
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 320
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 35

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2010, 13:11
It is A. The only one which restates the last statement of the QS.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 264
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 66

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2010, 07:13
A seems just about right to me.
_________________

Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!


"It always seems impossible until its done."
-Nelson Mandela

Expert Post
27 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6238
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1683

Kudos [?]: 9661 [27] , given: 198

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2010, 11:23
27
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
raghavs wrote:
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall. In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.

If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City
A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910
C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910


The question is asking for an option that is possible but not necessarily true.
Stimulus tells us:
HR > 2
MR 1 to 2
LR 0 to 1
No Rain 0

LR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910)
MR Days (1990) < MR Days (1910)
Yet, Total rainfall 1990 > Total rainfall 1910

A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
This is possible. Even if HR Days (1990) < HR Days (1910), still 1990 could have had higher total rainfall. Think if in 1990, HR days were fewer, but on each one of those days, it rained 50 inches whereas in 1910, HR Days were more but on each one of those days, it rained only 3 inches, then total rainfall in 1990 could be higher than that of 1910. This is the answer.

B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910.
Not possible because it is given that
LR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910)
MR Days (1990) < MR Days (1910)
So LR Days (1990) + MR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910) + MR Days (1910)

C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
Not possible because of the reason given in (B).

D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
Not Possible. On a moderate rainfall day, amount of rainfall is more than 1 but less than 2. If number of MR days in 1990 is less than the number of MR days in 1910, no amount of rain can make the total rainfall more than twice.

E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910
Not Possible.
Total rain (1990) > Total rain (1910)
Average rain per month = (Total rain)/12
Total rain (1990)/12 > Total rain (1910)/12
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 181
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 20

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2010, 11:24
Is this CR question or a PS question?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 7

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2010, 11:43
This a great question, but very confusing. Karishma thanks for the explanation on why A is correct. I would have wanted the statement to read: The number of days of heavy rainfall was higher in 1990 than in 1910 to confirm 1990 had greater total rainfall than 1910. Your point that even if there were more heavy rainfall days in 1910 but all of them equaling to 3 inches versus a few heavy days in 1990 which can have 50 inches is valid. Thank you.

Would this question really be 600 to 700? I'd imagine this to be 700+. What is the source?
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6238
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1683

Kudos [?]: 9661 [0], given: 198

Re: In Patton City [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2010, 11:57
Expert's post
Sarang wrote:
Is this CR question or a PS question?


Once people realize that CR is as logical as PS/DS, it becomes very easy.

and I would say the question is right there, at 700.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 6582
Followers: 641

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

Top 10 in overall
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2013, 04:55
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 6582
Followers: 641

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

Top 10 in overall
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2014, 20:51
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 50
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 55

In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2015, 12:11
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
raghavs wrote:
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall. In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.

If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City
A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910
C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910


The question is asking for an option that is possible but not necessarily true.
Stimulus tells us:
HR > 2
MR 1 to 2
LR 0 to 1
No Rain 0

LR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910)
MR Days (1990) < MR Days (1910)
Yet, Total rainfall 1990 > Total rainfall 1910

A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
This is possible. Even if HR Days (1990) < HR Days (1910), still 1990 could have had higher total rainfall. Think if in 1990, HR days were fewer, but on each one of those days, it rained 50 inches whereas in 1910, HR Days were more but on each one of those days, it rained only 3 inches, then total rainfall in 1990 could be higher than that of 1910. This is the answer.

B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910.
Not possible because it is given that
LR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910)
MR Days (1990) < MR Days (1910)
So LR Days (1990) + MR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910) + MR Days (1910)

C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
Not possible because of the reason given in (B).

D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
Not Possible. On a moderate rainfall day, amount of rainfall is more than 1 but less than 2. If number of MR days in 1990 is less than the number of MR days in 1910, no amount of rain can make the total rainfall more than twice.

E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910
Not Possible.
Total rain (1990) > Total rain (1910)
Average rain per month = (Total rain)/12
Total rain (1990)/12 > Total rain (1910)/12


Hi Karishma

Regarding Option D, Is it not possible that for the number of days in 1910, it rains 1.001 inches and in 1990 it rains 2 inches for lesser number of days than in 1910, then may be total inches is more in 1910 ?
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6238
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1683

Kudos [?]: 9661 [1] , given: 198

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2015, 18:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Radhika11 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
raghavs wrote:
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall. In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.

If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City
A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910
C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910


The question is asking for an option that is possible but not necessarily true.
Stimulus tells us:
HR > 2
MR 1 to 2
LR 0 to 1
No Rain 0

LR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910)
MR Days (1990) < MR Days (1910)
Yet, Total rainfall 1990 > Total rainfall 1910

A. the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
This is possible. Even if HR Days (1990) < HR Days (1910), still 1990 could have had higher total rainfall. Think if in 1990, HR days were fewer, but on each one of those days, it rained 50 inches whereas in 1910, HR Days were more but on each one of those days, it rained only 3 inches, then total rainfall in 1990 could be higher than that of 1910. This is the answer.

B. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910.
Not possible because it is given that
LR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910)
MR Days (1990) < MR Days (1910)
So LR Days (1990) + MR Days (1990) < LR Days (1910) + MR Days (1910)

C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
Not possible because of the reason given in (B).

D. the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
Not Possible. On a moderate rainfall day, amount of rainfall is more than 1 but less than 2. If number of MR days in 1990 is less than the number of MR days in 1910, no amount of rain can make the total rainfall more than twice.

E. the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910
Not Possible.
Total rain (1990) > Total rain (1910)
Average rain per month = (Total rain)/12
Total rain (1990)/12 > Total rain (1910)/12


Hi Karishma

Regarding Option D, Is it not possible that for the number of days in 1910, it rains 1.001 inches and in 1990 it rains 2 inches for lesser number of days than in 1910, then may be total inches is more in 1910 ?


More than twice means that for every 1.001 inch of rainfall in 1910, there must be more than 2.002 inches of rainfall in 1990. But moderate rainfall days cannot have more than 2 inches of rainfall so this is not possible.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2014
Posts: 19
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q39 V32
GRE 1: 310 Q159 V151
GPA: 2.9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 106

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2015, 06:09
VeritasPrepKarishma: I can perfectly understand the logic you gave for option B. But I don't understand how C is incorrect.!! If rainfall was 20% higher in 1990 and given that LR+MR (1990)<LR+MR(1910) then I am left with only one assumption that HR has to be higher in 1990.!! I do understand your explanation for option A. But I need more clarity.
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6238
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1683

Kudos [?]: 9661 [0], given: 198

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2015, 00:11
Expert's post
narendran1990 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma: I can perfectly understand the logic you gave for option B. But I don't understand how C is incorrect.!! If rainfall was 20% higher in 1990 and given that LR+MR (1990)<LR+MR(1910) then I am left with only one assumption that HR has to be higher in 1990.!! I do understand your explanation for option A. But I need more clarity.



C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910

The days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches are LR days and MR days. So (C) says
LR Days + MR Days (1990) > LR Days + MR Days (1910)

But from our analysis of the argument, we already know that
LR Days + MR Days (1990) < LR Days + MR Days (1910)

Hence (C) is not possible.

As for (A), it is based on the logic that more days of rainfall does not mean more rainfall (inches). The intensity of rainfall can be higher over fewer days and hence fewer days could result in more rainfall.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 109
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 23

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2015, 03:53
This really is a great question. The moment I decided for D I realised my mistake and then confirmed it with the help of Karishma's explanation. Will evaluate questions that include some numbers more carefully in the future. I was too stuck with the idea from Pre-thinking that Patton City must have compensated the loss in rainfall somehow, most probably with greater number of heavy rainfall days. Then as soon as I read A I was like "nope, exactly the opposite of what I am looking for."

Great lesson.
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy   [#permalink] 10 Nov 2015, 03:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy vivektripathi 13 14 Dec 2008, 04:11
3 In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy seofah 9 12 Nov 2008, 10:34
104 Experts publish their posts in the topic In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy quantum 89 14 Jun 2008, 11:55
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy KC 16 16 Oct 2006, 20:40
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy jzchina 11 13 May 2006, 20:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.