Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Dec 2014, 01:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 464
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 6

In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2008, 23:28
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

87% (02:03) correct 13% (01:14) wrong based on 616 sessions
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.

B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.

C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.

D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility.

E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1317
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 62

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 157

GMAT ToolKit User
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2009, 13:56
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.

Right or wrong options with explanation will be appreciated. :)
_________________

[ From 470 to 680-My Story ] [ My Last Month Before Test ]
[ GMAT Prep Analysis Tool ] [ US. Business School Dashboard ] [ Int. Business School Dashboard ]

I Can, I Will

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 341
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [2] , given: 14

Re: In recent years, many cabinetmakers.... [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2009, 15:54
2
This post received
KUDOS
Premise :Since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product.
Conclusion :cabinetmaking is not art.

A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. - not a good assumption to conclude that cabinetmaking is not art

(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. - opposite answer , actually weakens the conclusion

(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. -Contender - keep it aside
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. - good assumption , keep it aside
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. - not related

(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
- it looks like they are already concerned that means some of the furniture is not art . against the conclusion as conclusion captures all the products that cabinetmakers create , reject this option

D)An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. - This is your answer


D it is
_________________

Always tag your question

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [1] , given: 39

Re: In recent years, many cabinetmakers.... [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2011, 01:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
A -- Weakens the conclusion. Is not an assumption in that it does not fill in any hole in the argument. To some extent even contradicts the premises.

B -- This unnecessarily distinguishes between cabinetmakers. May strengthen the conclusion but does not fill in the logic gap.

C -- Red herring choice. Notice thw word currently. While this may be true, it is neither supported by the argument nor connected with the conclusion. Out of scope.

D -- correct answer. Connects the premise 'since furn must be useful, CM should pay attention to utility' to conc 'CM is not an art'

E -- Out of scope. $ is nowhere in the argument!
_________________

Hope this post helps! :)
Your kudos will let me know.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 191
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 1

Re: In recent years, many cabinetmakers.... [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2011, 07:27
+1 for D. it clearly states that if an object is not art if its maker is more concerned about its practical utility.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 222 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2013, 00:03
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
where furnitures are placed has no bearing to the argument...

(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
the concern of the makers is irrelevant... the issue is whether cabinetmaking is an art or not...

(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
what ought to be the concern is irrelevant... the issue is whether cabinetmaking is an art...

(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
If an object can be an art even with practical utility then the conclusion is invalid. hence, this needs to be asssumed

(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
concern is irrelevant...

Answer: D
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 307
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 46

In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 02:16
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.

Every right or wrong options explanation is needed
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 02:43
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
Reason: If furnitures are made to be placed in the museum without let anyone use them then they are very likely consider to be piece of art., thus contradict the argument
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
Reason: Comaprison among cabinetmarkers but not focus on usefulness of product, out of context
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
Reason: this is moreover a suggestion or advice , not giving solid reason
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
Reason: This is like "If concern with Practicla utility -----> object is not art" forms solid foundation for the conclusion that if cabinetmaking is more concern with practical utility then it cant be consider as an art.
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
Reason: There is no discussion of monetary values and how they are related to practical Utility or art.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2013, 13:12
In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.

(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.

(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.

(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.

(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.



Also i am a little confused from the meaning of the argument.


>>> But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product
means -- since furniture should be useful; CMs should keep that in mind ; as if they are not currently doing so and author is saying they should make USEFUL cabinets
"must" gives a futuristic view. So we are not sure what kind of cabinets are being currently made. thus we cant say why it cant be an art.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 90
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.2
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 3

Re: OG CR [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2013, 13:28
Hello,

The argument implies that currently many cabinetmakers win acclaim as artists. However, cabinetmakers also need to pay attention to the utility of the cabinets and hence, cabinet making is not an art.

This depends on the assumption that while making something , if you need to consider its utility, then it is not an art form. This is directly mentioned in D. However, let us analyze the rest of the options. Let us try the negation test to check this.

(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. This is irrelevant.
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. Some cabinetmakers might be more concerned with the utility of their products. However, this does not imply that their work is not an art form. This option does not give us any relationship between cabinetmaking and art form.
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. This suggests that the cabinetmakers need to more concerned with the practical utility of their products. However, it does not tell us whether cabinetmaking is an art form or not.
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. Might be the assumption.
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. The negative of this is that artists are concerned with the monetary value of their products. However, does this cause the conclusion to fail? The conclusion still stands as the decision of whether cabinetmaking is an art or not does not depend on its monetary value in this argument. The conclusion depends on whether it can be considered an art form if it is made with some purpose or utility in mind.

Regarding your second question, the statement "But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product" implies that since furniture need to be useful, cabinetmakers have to consider the utility of the furniture. The "must" in the argument does not give a futuristic outlook. Rather, it highlights the necessity of considering the utility of the cabinet while constructing it.

Hopefully this clarified your doubt. Please let me know if you need any further clarification.

z3nith wrote:
In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful,
cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason,
cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for
that conclusion?
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they
produce.
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they
currently are.
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.

Also i am a little confused from the meaning of the argument.


>>> But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product
means -- since furniture should be useful; CMs should keep that in mind ; as if they are not currently doing so and author is saying they should make USEFUL cabinets
"must" gives a futuristic view. So we are not sure what kind of cabinets are being currently made. thus we cant say why it cant be an art.

_________________

Thanks
Kris
Instructor at Aspire4GMAT

Visit us at http://www.aspire4gmat.com

Post your queries
Join our free GMAT course

New blog: How to get that 700+
New blog: Data Sufficiency Tricks


Press Kudos if this helps!

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 9

Re: OG CR [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2013, 16:37
Hello z3nith,

z3nith wrote:
Also i am a little confused from the meaning of the argument.
>>> But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product
means -- since furniture should be useful; CMs should keep that in mind ; as if they are not currently doing so and author is saying they should make USEFUL cabinets
"must" gives a futuristic view. So we are not sure what kind of cabinets are being currently made. thus we cant say why it cant be an art.


Since furniture must be useful <- it is the a proprety of furniture : every furniture is useful .

Cabinetmakers are producing furniture which is useful ... and CM don't create objects other than furniture (definition of CM). Hence, they are always creating usefull products . Then we can deduce that they see utility of the object they're creating !
_________________

The Kudo, please :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 70

Re: cabinet makers [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 18:57
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1150
Location: United States
Followers: 155

Kudos [?]: 1512 [0], given: 122

Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 21:09
Nihit wrote:
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.

B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.

C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.

D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility.

E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.


Premise: cabinetmakers = artists
Premise: Currently, cabinetmakers pay more attention to practical utility.
Conclusion: cabinetmaking is not art.

Assumption: practical utility is different from art. Objects that are more practical will not be considered art.

D is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 193
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 72

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2014, 06:05
Nihit wrote:
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.

B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.

C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.

D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility.

E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.



Conclusion: cabinetmaking is not art

Premise: 1) cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product
2)In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists

Assumption: 1) Artist wont give a object for practical use / Artist is not concerned about practical utility of the product

A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. - Irrelevant. Furniture placed in museum has nothing to do with the Cabinetmakers

B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. - Comparison of the cabinet makers can not prove they are not artists

C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. - Given in the premise. so this cannot be the answer

D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility. - Fills the gap between the premise and conclusion

E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. - Out of scope. we have nothing to with artist monetary value

Regards,
Swami.
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim   [#permalink] 21 Apr 2014, 06:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning z3nith 0 01 Apr 2013, 16:37
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim mun23 0 06 Mar 2013, 02:43
In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been bakfed 2 13 Oct 2009, 20:46
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim Hussain15 0 09 Feb 2013, 00:03
In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been gamjatang 5 19 Dec 2005, 19:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.