|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 461
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 6
|
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink]
08 Sep 2008, 00:28
Question Stats:
91% (01:42) correct
8% (00:23) wrong based on 18 sessions
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion? A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility. E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1327
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 43
Kudos [?]:
383
[0], given: 156
|
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink]
10 Sep 2009, 14:56
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion? (A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. (B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. (E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. Right or wrong options with explanation will be appreciated.
_________________
[ From 470 to 680-My Story ] [ My Last Month Before Test ] [ GMAT Prep Analysis Tool ] [ US. Business School Dashboard ] [ Int. Business School Dashboard ]
I Can, I Will
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 349
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
24
[1] , given: 10
|
Re: In recent years, many cabinetmakers.... [#permalink]
10 Sep 2009, 16:54
1
This post received KUDOS
Premise :Since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. Conclusion :cabinetmaking is not art. A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. - not a good assumption to conclude that cabinetmaking is not art(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. - opposite answer , actually weakens the conclusion (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. - Contender - keep it aside (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. - good assumption , keep it aside(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. - not related (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. - it looks like they are already concerned that means some of the furniture is not art . against the conclusion as conclusion captures all the products that cabinetmakers create , reject this option D)An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. - This is your answer D it is
_________________
Always tag your question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 94
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 38
|
Re: In recent years, many cabinetmakers.... [#permalink]
18 Aug 2011, 02:46
A -- Weakens the conclusion. Is not an assumption in that it does not fill in any hole in the argument. To some extent even contradicts the premises. B -- This unnecessarily distinguishes between cabinetmakers. May strengthen the conclusion but does not fill in the logic gap. C -- Red herring choice. Notice thw word currently. While this may be true, it is neither supported by the argument nor connected with the conclusion. Out of scope. D -- correct answer. Connects the premise 'since furn must be useful, CM should pay attention to utility' to conc 'CM is not an art' E -- Out of scope. $ is nowhere in the argument!
_________________
Hope this post helps!  Your kudos will let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 192
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 1
|
Re: In recent years, many cabinetmakers.... [#permalink]
18 Aug 2011, 08:27
+1 for D. it clearly states that if an object is not art if its maker is more concerned about its practical utility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 468
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
74
[0], given: 11
|
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink]
09 Feb 2013, 01:03
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. where furnitures are placed has no bearing to the argument...
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. the concern of the makers is irrelevant... the issue is whether cabinetmaking is an art or not...
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. what ought to be the concern is irrelevant... the issue is whether cabinetmaking is an art...
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. If an object can be an art even with practical utility then the conclusion is invalid. hence, this needs to be asssumed
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. concern is irrelevant...
Answer: D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 324
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
27
[0], given: 46
|
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink]
06 Mar 2013, 03:16
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion? (A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. (B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. (E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
Every right or wrong options explanation is needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 4
|
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink]
06 Mar 2013, 03:43
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. Reason: If furnitures are made to be placed in the museum without let anyone use them then they are very likely consider to be piece of art., thus contradict the argument (B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. Reason: Comaprison among cabinetmarkers but not focus on usefulness of product, out of context (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. Reason: this is moreover a suggestion or advice , not giving solid reason (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. Reason: This is like "If concern with Practicla utility -----> object is not art" forms solid foundation for the conclusion that if cabinetmaking is more concern with practical utility then it cant be consider as an art. (E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. Reason: There is no discussion of monetary values and how they are related to practical Utility or art.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 30
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 1
|
In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning [#permalink]
01 Apr 2013, 14:12
In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?
(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
(C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
(D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
Also i am a little confused from the meaning of the argument.
>>> But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product means -- since furniture should be useful; CMs should keep that in mind ; as if they are not currently doing so and author is saying they should make USEFUL cabinets "must" gives a futuristic view. So we are not sure what kind of cabinets are being currently made. thus we cant say why it cant be an art.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 90
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.2
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
36
[0], given: 3
|
Hello, The argument implies that currently many cabinetmakers win acclaim as artists. However, cabinetmakers also need to pay attention to the utility of the cabinets and hence, cabinet making is not an art. This depends on the assumption that while making something , if you need to consider its utility, then it is not an art form. This is directly mentioned in D. However, let us analyze the rest of the options. Let us try the negation test to check this. (A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. This is irrelevant. (B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. Some cabinetmakers might be more concerned with the utility of their products. However, this does not imply that their work is not an art form. This option does not give us any relationship between cabinetmaking and art form. (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. This suggests that the cabinetmakers need to more concerned with the practical utility of their products. However, it does not tell us whether cabinetmaking is an art form or not. (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. Might be the assumption. (E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. The negative of this is that artists are concerned with the monetary value of their products. However, does this cause the conclusion to fail? The conclusion still stands as the decision of whether cabinetmaking is an art or not does not depend on its monetary value in this argument. The conclusion depends on whether it can be considered an art form if it is made with some purpose or utility in mind. Regarding your second question, the statement "But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product" implies that since furniture need to be useful, cabinetmakers have to consider the utility of the furniture. The "must" in the argument does not give a futuristic outlook. Rather, it highlights the necessity of considering the utility of the cabinet while constructing it. Hopefully this clarified your doubt. Please let me know if you need any further clarification. z3nith wrote: In recent years, many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion? (A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone. (B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce. (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are. (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility. (E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
Also i am a little confused from the meaning of the argument.
>>> But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product means -- since furniture should be useful; CMs should keep that in mind ; as if they are not currently doing so and author is saying they should make USEFUL cabinets "must" gives a futuristic view. So we are not sure what kind of cabinets are being currently made. thus we cant say why it cant be an art.
_________________
Thanks Kris Instructor at Aspire4GMAT
Visit us at http://www.aspire4gmat.com
Post your queries Join our free GMAT course
New blog: How to get that 700+ New blog: Data Sufficiency Tricks
Press Kudos if this helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 25
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 9
|
Hello z3nith, z3nith wrote: Also i am a little confused from the meaning of the argument. >>> But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product means -- since furniture should be useful; CMs should keep that in mind ; as if they are not currently doing so and author is saying they should make USEFUL cabinets "must" gives a futuristic view. So we are not sure what kind of cabinets are being currently made. thus we cant say why it cant be an art. Since furniture must be useful <- it is the a proprety of furniture : every furniture is useful . Cabinetmakers are producing furniture which is useful ... and CM don't create objects other than furniture (definition of CM). Hence, they are always creating usefull products . Then we can deduce that they see utility of the object they're creating !
_________________
The Kudo, please
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 421
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
94
[0], given: 48
|
Re: cabinet makers [#permalink]
17 Apr 2013, 19:57
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged. Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: Rules for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum
Collection of Questions: .... Verbal Challenge 1.1: SC Questions .... Verbal Challenge 1.2: CR Questions
Resources: .... Common Redundancies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 340
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
67
[0], given: 70
|
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim [#permalink]
17 Apr 2013, 22:09
Nihit wrote: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?
A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility.
E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. Premise: cabinetmakers = artists Premise: Currently, cabinetmakers pay more attention to practical utility. Conclusion: cabinetmaking is not art. Assumption: practical utility is different from art. Objects that are more practical will not be considered art. D is correct.
_________________
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.
Choosing correct answers is not as important as explaining why other answers are wrong. Keep learning everyday!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim
[#permalink]
17 Apr 2013, 22:09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|