Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 02:28
Customize  |  Hide

In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2011, 09:38
00:00

Question Stats:

55% (01:55) correct 44% (00:39) wrong based on 3 sessions
In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their aging, inefficient fleets for a smaller number of efficient new airplanes, in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced and partly because low entry barriers for new carriers have created intense competition.


(A) in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced

(B) in part that high fuel costs might be lowered and repair costs might be reduced

(C) partly because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced your answer

(D) partly for the lowering of high fuel costs and the reduction of repair costs

(E) partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs

Hi guys,

Shouldn't (E) be "to lower... AND to reduce" to be parallel? Why is it optional? I picked C because of it has explicit parallel structure even though it sounds very awkward!
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by DYNAMITE on 05 Jul 2011, 10:13, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 304
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 7

CAT Tests
Re: Parallelism [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2011, 19:08
I agree. It should be " partly TO lower high fuel prices and TO reduce repair costs".
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me KUDOS!

Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Parallelism [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2011, 19:30
Can anyone explain... why E and not C???
I also thought it to be C...
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Parallelism [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2011, 20:37
The answer is E.
C is wordy and thus eliminated
Consider this :
Mary likes to eat and dance. ("We can share the infinitive form b/w the two verbs")
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 63
Location: Paris, FRANCE
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 3

Re: Parallelism [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2011, 10:39
DYNAMITE wrote:
In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their aging, inefficient fleets for a smaller number of efficient new airplanes, in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced and partly because low entry barriers for new carriers have created intense competition.


(A) in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced

(B) in part that high fuel costs might be lowered and repair costs might be reduced

(C) partly because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced your answer

(D) partly for the lowering of high fuel costs and the reduction of repair costs

(E) partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs

Hi guys,

Shouldn't (E) be "to lower... AND to reduce" to be parallel? Why is it optional? I picked C because of it has explicit parallel structure even though it sounds very awkward!


No, it is still parallel because you cut off at the same point for each item on the list:

PARTLY TO

1. lower fuel costs
2. reduce repair costs

Parallelism is not just about making two items in a list look stylistically and logically similar. It is about splitting off at the same point for each item.

This may help you visualize the concept: http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/diagrams2/diagram10.htm
_________________

Nicholas MOSES

GMAT/Academic Manager
c/o MBA Center Paris

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 575
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: Parallelism [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2011, 11:40
DYNAMITE wrote:
In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their aging, inefficient fleets for a smaller number of efficient new airplanes, in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced and partly because low entry barriers for new carriers have created intense competition.


(A) in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced

(B) in part that high fuel costs might be lowered and repair costs might be reduced

(C) partly because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced your answer

(D) partly for the lowering of high fuel costs and the reduction of repair costs

(E) partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs

Hi guys,

Shouldn't (E) be "to lower... AND to reduce" to be parallel? Why is it optional? I picked C because of it has explicit parallel structure even though it sounds very awkward!


Has to E.
you dont need to repeat the infinitive again because of the usage of conjunction 'and'.
Rice (Jones) Thread Master
User avatar
Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 210
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 33

GMAT Tests User
Re: Parallelism [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2011, 12:57
DYNAMITE wrote:
In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their aging, inefficient fleets for a smaller number of efficient new airplanes, in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced and partly because low entry barriers for new carriers have created intense competition.


(A) in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced

(B) in part that high fuel costs might be lowered and repair costs might be reduced

(C) partly because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced your answer

(D) partly for the lowering of high fuel costs and the reduction of repair costs

(E) partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs

Hi guys,

Shouldn't (E) be "to lower... AND to reduce" to be parallel? Why is it optional? I picked C because of it has explicit parallel structure even though it sounds very awkward!

I have a doubt. The two parallel elements that i am comparing have been higlighted below- 'partly to' and 'partly because'. Shouldn't both the parallel elements start with partly because as in option 'C'?
partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs and partly because low entry barriers for new carriers have created intense competition.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 62

Re: In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2012, 01:28
Can someone please explain reasons to eliminate C ?
Why E is better over C in terms of parallelism ?
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 139
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 37

Re: In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2012, 01:55
DYNAMITE wrote:
In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their aging, inefficient fleets for a smaller number of efficient new airplanes, in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced and partly because low entry barriers for new carriers have created intense competition.


(A) in part because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced

(B) in part that high fuel costs might be lowered and repair costs might be reduced

(C) partly because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced your answer

(D) partly for the lowering of high fuel costs and the reduction of repair costs

(E) partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs

Hi guys,

Shouldn't (E) be "to lower... AND to reduce" to be parallel? Why is it optional? I picked C because of it has explicit parallel structure even though it sounds very awkward!




its easy to eliminate A,B looking at the non underlined part..among C,D & E

(C) partly because high fuel costs should be lowered and repair costs should be reduced your answer - should is a subjunctive verb and can not be used when the intent is definite. Here the fleets are replaced to reducefuel cost..... not that fleets are reduced because fuel cost should be reduced...

(D) partly for the lowering of high fuel costs and the reduction of repair costs - this is not the best construction

(E) partly to lower high fuel prices and reduce repair costs -Correct


B is wrong -
we do x to achieve y.
we do x so that y should be achieved. (Is the difference visible??)

E- is right-

infinitives are used in two ways-

1. to do,to think,to make and to reach.
2. to do,think,make and reach.

either to should be used with every verb in the list or should be used only once in the beginning of the list.

to do,make,think and to reach - this is an incorrect construction.

Hope this helps! :)
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post


Last edited by yashii9 on 05 Oct 2012, 09:26, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 62

Re: In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2012, 08:16
Quote:
should is a subjective verb and can not be used when the intent is definite


Can you please throw more light on the acceptable usage of SHOULD ?
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 139
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 37

Re: In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2012, 09:25
anshunadir wrote:
Quote:
should is a subjective verb and can not be used when the intent is definite


Can you please throw more light on the acceptable usage of SHOULD ?

B is wrong -
we do x to achieve y.
we do x so that y should be achieved. (Is the difference visible??)
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Re: In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2012, 09:25
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Several airlines have recently intensified their fierce Paul 6 28 Sep 2004, 20:24
New posts Several airlines have recently intensified their fierce Janice 8 09 Jan 2005, 19:22
Popular new posts Several airlines have recently intensified their fierce joemama142000 13 07 Nov 2005, 17:44
Popular new posts 1 Several airlines have recently intensified their fierce ykaiim 13 26 May 2010, 02:09
New posts 2 "Several airlines have recently intensified..." niheil 8 12 Oct 2010, 21:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In recent years, troubled airlines have exchanged their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.