Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 12 Jul 2014, 03:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 246
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2006, 01:03
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet
division has not increased significantly since 1994.


B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.


C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.


D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.


E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
_________________

“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Los Angles
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Jet division [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2006, 02:26
Ans is E.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2006, 05:04
AgreE
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2006, 05:20
Prephrased the assumption and scanned down to (E).

:45
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 00:35
What about B?

B also presents a strong assumption.
After all its the production of passenger jets that produce the waste. If the division produced less passenger jets that in 1994 the amount of waste produced will also be less.

E is also a strong assumption.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 00:45
I'll also go with E.
Since it is directly mentioned in the passage that 'waste output was 90 pounds per production worker '. This makes E a strong assumption when compared to B.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Hyderabad, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 02:15
It is E
_________________

Hema

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 09:11
when I see a question like this I need to assume that whatever the parameters were in the beginning of comparison, should be the same at the end... I was looking exactly for clarification of number of workers and found it in E
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2923
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 10:11
Easy E.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Location: South Korea
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

not easy [#permalink] New post 27 Jul 2006, 01:47
:lol:
This is not easy question. I think B is correct. E is a trap. The article already said that the mazardous waste reduced to 40 pounds per production worker. therefore, it is already stated in the article that the number of production worker is the same both in 1994 and last year.

why B? Please refer to the reply above. someone explained it.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 115
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2006, 11:57
E it is.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2006, 14:17
Tough choice between B and E... I think I will go with B finally..since the total waste output needs to be cut in half(as per the goal) and not per worker...
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 783
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2006, 14:20
The argument is about the total hazardous waste generated by the airline manufacturer. The stat given as proof of reduction is waste per prodn worker.

Now, number of airplanes produced does not depend on nbr of workers. Neither do we have any stats regarding waste generated per plane. Hence B is very clearly out.

Assume there were 50 workers in 1994, and 110 last year - calculate total waste generated. Answer is evident. E.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2006, 17:33
hey Gauss, what's the OA?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2308
Schools: Darden
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 421 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2006, 14:12
E was exactly the answer I imagined when I read the question.
  [#permalink] 31 Jul 2006, 14:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane bkk145 18 30 Aug 2007, 19:54
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane KC 8 17 Oct 2006, 20:47
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane gamjatang 18 07 Dec 2005, 07:15
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane nakib77 18 20 Sep 2005, 10:31
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane chunjuwu 12 28 Dec 2004, 21:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.