In several cities, the government is going ahead with : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 17:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In several cities, the government is going ahead with

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6516 [0], given: 1008

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 15:08
sharmila79 wrote:
carcass wrote:
A is the only make sense as assumption

the other choices do not hold any water

A) Adaption of vacant office space to meet the governments requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such space a more cost effective alternative to new construction.

B) the government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost effective

C) I f facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the governments requirements for facilities the government needs, the government relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

D) the government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of the facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.

E) before embarking on any construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost effective.

for the reason in A the gov spend more money but is not guilty

What is the conclusion here? Is it "Govt. is not guilty of making any new construction"?

In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirement for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

this is the conclusion
_________________
Manager
Status: GMAT Streetfighter!!
Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 59
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 82 [1] , given: 21

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 15:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
sharmila79 wrote:
carcass wrote:
A is the only make sense as assumption

the other choices do not hold any water

A) Adaption of vacant office space to meet the governments requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such space a more cost effective alternative to new construction.

B) the government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost effective

C) I f facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the governments requirements for facilities the government needs, the government relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

D) the government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of the facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.

E) before embarking on any construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost effective.

for the reason in A the gov spend more money but is not guilty

What is the conclusion here? Is it "Govt. is not guilty of making any new construction"?

IMO

Argument is as follow:

Conclusion:The governments decision to build the new construction is not a waste of money,

Because (Insert assumption)...

"Adaption of vacant office space to meet the governments requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such space a more cost effective alternative to new construction"

@carcass..Do you agree?
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6516 [0], given: 1008

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 15:56
yup

Constructing building is not a waste of money, but the gov can do nothing in this scenario so it has to rent spaces for officies --------> the gov has no guilty for the money spent.

Of course you are right about your $$ghost$$ conclusion in somehow.

During the exam or practice, though, relying on the real conclusion; that is the landmark "The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness."
_________________
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2012
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 94

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2013, 09:25
If Choice A was not there, then is option D a correct choice? Because, option D states that the govt. will not feel guilty because the more govt. constructions coming up is not going to pile up the offices more. But, option A brings in one more dimension to the whole scenario by bringing renovation to the old offices. So, basically, the choice says that since renovation of old offices is going to be more expensive than constructing new buildings, the govt. will not feel guilty upon spending on new projects.
@carcass, Please correct me if I got the whole thing wrong. I feel assumptions are easy, but not all of them, like this one. I am trying to understand and do better how much ever complicated these questions are. If my reasoning is good and logical I feel I can do better.
Manager
Status: GMAT Streetfighter!!
Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 59
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 21

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2013, 14:09
sharmila79 wrote:
If Choice A was not there, then is option D a correct choice? Because, option D states that the govt. will not feel guilty because the more govt. constructions coming up is not going to pile up the offices more. But, option A brings in one more dimension to the whole scenario by bringing renovation to the old offices. So, basically, the choice says that since renovation of old offices is going to be more expensive than constructing new buildings, the govt. will not feel guilty upon spending on new projects.
@carcass, Please correct me if I got the whole thing wrong. I feel assumptions are easy, but not all of them, like this one. I am trying to understand and do better how much ever complicated these questions are. If my reasoning is good and logical I feel I can do better.

Choice D seems to imply that the extra supply of office spacing would not have impact from a  standpoint. But it still does not address whether it is best to lease or to build a new construction.

Look at this question with your "Decision Analyst" thinking cap. What makes more sense? Lease or build?

TIM: "Should the city lease or build the new project? Despite the fact that there is vacant office space that can be used"

Jose:"Well, keep in mind that the the extra supply will not hurt us economically"

Tim: "That does not answer the question. Is it more expensive to build or to use the existing space."

Jose:"Oh sorry about that, it makes more sense to build because after taking into account the added cost of adapting the vacant buildings to work for the courts, building makes more sense financially.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10529
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2014, 08:02
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 131
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 101

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2014, 23:42
P1:In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities.
P2:The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirement for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories.

conclusion: The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Adaption of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost effective alternative to new construction.
if Adaption of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, would make leasing such office space a more cost effective alternative to new construction then it breaks the conclusion and shows that the government is responsible for fiscal wastefulness.
so this the assumption.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10529
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2015, 09:08
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10529
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 03:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In several cities, the government is going ahead with   [#permalink] 02 Sep 2016, 03:05

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Inference Revision: Government restrictions have severely limited 4 14 Feb 2015, 01:56
3 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 7 02 Oct 2012, 09:23
3 Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of 35 28 Apr 2012, 18:50
5 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 19 02 Apr 2010, 05:17
In several cities, the government is going ahead with 4 28 Dec 2007, 10:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In several cities, the government is going ahead with

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.