Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 14:39 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 14:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618805 [15]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Posts: 183
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 687
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.6
WE:Marketing (Hospitality and Tourism)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 166
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.19
Send PM
Re: In the Centerville Botanical Gardens, all tulip trees are older than [#permalink]
I can't understand how is the right answer E.

A) This statement is clearly false since there is no overlap between tulip and dogwoods.
So, choice A is out.

B) We know that there are some sycamores that are younger than maples, and all dogwoods are younger than maples. It makes this answer choice ''can be true'', not ''must be true'', since it can be that some sycamores are younger than maples but older than dogwoods. But it can also be the case where some dogwoods are at least as old as some sycamores.
So, choice B is also out.

C) We know that majority of sycamores are older than maples, and all maples are older than any dogwoods. So, the statement that there are some sycamores that are not as old as oldest dogwoods has to be correct.

D) Along the same line of reasoning of choice B, this statement is also ''can be true'' statement.
So, choice D is out.

E) We know that majority of sycamores are older than maples, and all tulips are older than maples. So, it can perfectly be the case that some sycamores that are older than maples can be as old as, or older than, tulips. There is an overlap between the two. How can we be sure that this statement is must be true, as opposed to choice C, which is always true regardless of the circumstances ? That's why I think that choice E is also ''can be true'' statement, and choice C is the correct answer here.

Please correct my reasoning if I am missing something crucial here.
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Posts: 590
Own Kudos [?]: 301 [0]
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: In the Centerville Botanical Gardens, all tulip trees are older than [#permalink]
hovhannesmkrtchyan wrote:
I can't understand how is the right answer E.

A) This statement is clearly false since there is no overlap between tulip and dogwoods.
So, choice A is out.

B) We know that there are some sycamores that are younger than maples, and all dogwoods are younger than maples. It makes this answer choice ''can be true'', not ''must be true'', since it can be that some sycamores are younger than maples but older than dogwoods. But it can also be the case where some dogwoods are at least as old as some sycamores.
So, choice B is also out.

C) We know that majority of sycamores are older than maples, and all maples are older than any dogwoods. So, the statement that there are some sycamores that are not as old as oldest dogwoods has to be correct.

D) Along the same line of reasoning of choice B, this statement is also ''can be true'' statement.
So, choice D is out.

E) We know that majority of sycamores are older than maples, and all tulips are older than maples. So, it can perfectly be the case that some sycamores that are older than maples can be as old as, or older than, tulips. There is an overlap between the two. How can we be sure that this statement is must be true, as opposed to choice C, which is always true regardless of the circumstances ? That's why I think that choice E is also ''can be true'' statement, and choice C is the correct answer here.

Please correct my reasoning if I am missing something crucial here.


Well for C, you haven't considered the minority of sycamores. These minorities could be anywhere. They just have to be younger than 1 maple. That's all we can conclude about the minority of Sycamores and thus, some of them could be as old as the oldest dogwoods.

Option E is correct for similar reasoning. There are definitely some sycamores (minority) that are younger than at least 1 maple. As all the Tulips are older than all the Maples, some sycamores will definitely be younger than the youngest tulips. What you've stated about E (highlighted) is correct, but it has nothing to do with option E. What you've mentioned does not disprove E.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the Centerville Botanical Gardens, all tulip trees are older than [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In the Centerville Botanical Gardens, all tulip trees are older than [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne