In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 17:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2007, 20:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ times the length of RS?

1) The length of PQ is 5.
2) The length of QR times the length of PR is equal to 12.
Attachments

triangle_deleteme.JPG [ 3.41 KiB | Viewed 1703 times ]

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1381
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: Triangle DS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2007, 20:08
ellisje22 wrote:
In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ times the length of RS?

1) The length of PQ is 5.
2) The length of QR times the length of PR is equal to 12.

C

1) is INSUFF

2) QR may be 3/x and PR may be 4x So we cannot say anything about PQ

So taking both (1) and (2)

1/2*PR*QR = 1/2*RS*PQ
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Actually... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 06:59
Actually the OA from Princeton Review is B. I personally thought it should have been D for the logic below:

Statement 1 should be sufficient because...
The question is basically looking for the area of the triangle.
You are given in statement 1 that PQ equals 5, so shouldn't you know that PS must be 2.5 and QS must be 2.5?
And since you know that triangle PRS is a 90-45-45 triangle (since you are given a 90 degree angle and you can see that the angle at R is split in half) than you have an isoceles triangle.
And since you know that PS is 2.5, then you'd know that RS is also 2.5 (since the sides opposite equal angles should be equal)?
Finally since you are given PQ and you figured out RS from the steps above, this statement should be sufficient.

Statement 2 is sufficient (which I agree with the book on) because...
The question is basically looking for the area of the triangle.
PR times QR should equal PQ times RS

Am I wrong or is the book wrong?
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1797
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

Re: Actually... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 07:09
ellisje22 wrote:
Actually the OA from Princeton Review is B. I personally thought it should have been D for the logic below:

Statement 1 should be sufficient because...
The question is basically looking for the area of the triangle.
You are given in statement 1 that PQ equals 5, so shouldn't you know that PS must be 2.5 and QS must be 2.5?
And since you know that triangle PRS is a 90-45-45 triangle (since you are given a 90 degree angle and you can see that the angle at R is split in half) than you have an isoceles triangle.
And since you know that PS is 2.5, then you'd know that RS is also 2.5 (since the sides opposite equal angles should be equal)?
Finally since you are given PQ and you figured out RS from the steps above, this statement should be sufficient.

Statement 2 is sufficient (which I agree with the book on) because...
The question is basically looking for the area of the triangle.
PR times QR should equal PQ times RS

Am I wrong or is the book wrong?

This is where the problem is. In GMAT test, we never can rely on the figure. The figure wrongly represents a kind of half of a square.

But, it is not. We cannot say that the 2 other angles are 45 degree each. So, we could have any kind of right triangular

The OA is correct
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 350
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: Triangle DS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2007, 10:56
ellisje22 wrote:
In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ times the length of RS?

1) The length of PQ is 5.
2) The length of QR times the length of PR is equal to 12.

(1) We need RS to have sufficient data. As the angles at Q and P are not determined, RS is not determined => Insuff => B, C or E.

(2) PR * RS = 2 * Area of the triangle.
From the diagram: Area of the triangle = QR * PR = given data => PR * RS is determined => Suff => B.
Re: Triangle DS   [#permalink] 06 Jan 2007, 10:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the figure above (attached), what is the length of PQ

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.