Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Options A or C cannot be correct answer since these points aren't even on segment PQ. E (1,0) is clearly closer to P, so it's also out, D is right in the middle of the segment, so only option B is left.

The question ask to divide the line PQ into 2:1 ratio and find the point. By symmetry, the line segment at x-axis (1,0) will be divided in ratio 1:2. Similarly, at (2,1) line will be divided in ration 2:1

Each week we'll be posting several questions from The Official Guide for GMAT® Review, 13th Edition and then after couple of days we'll provide Official Answer (OA) to them along with a slution.

We'll be glad if you participate in development of this project: 1. Please provide your solutions to the questions; 2. Please vote for the best solutions by pressing Kudos button; 3. Please vote for the questions themselves by pressing Kudos button; 4. Please share your views on difficulty level of the questions, so that we have most precise evaluation.

Thank you!

By looking at the figure it comes out that option "B" (2,1) is the right choice.

Options A or C cannot be correct answer since these points aren't even on segment PQ. E (1,0) is clearly closer to P, so it's also out, D is right in the middle of the segment, so only option B is left.

Answer: B.

Kudos points given to everyone with correct solution. Let me know if I missed someone.
_________________

Re: In the figure above, the point on segment PQ that is twice a [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2012, 14:14

Sachin9 wrote:

twice as far from P as from Q

This confused me..I thought teh Qs is asking for the midpoint..

Could somebody explain me what it is asking..

and thanks bunuel for POE method. but how would u solve this algebraically?

I concur. I think it would be helpful if we can solve this algebraically using the given y-coordinate and point Q, rather than elimination — similar to Bunel's approach to this problem.
_________________

Plugging values, we obtain answer as (2,1). Hence B

Once you know the formula its very easy.

P.S. Bunuel's approach is beautifully elegant. However, for me solving algebraically is much faster than figuring the answer choices out.
_________________

Re: In the figure above, the point on segment PQ that is twice a [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Dec 2012, 01:10

I was thinking along those lines by forming a triangle and then solving it. This is a fairly easy question you can still use the answer choices but if its a bit more complicated I would like a fast approach.

Attachments

Plane 2.png [ 9.82 KiB | Viewed 18596 times ]

_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Plugging values, we obtain answer as (2,1). Hence B

Once you know the formula its very easy.

P.S. Bunuel's approach is beautifully elegant. However, for me solving algebraically is much faster than figuring the answer choices out.

This is called section formula. It will be helpful. Thanks
_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously Wont give up till i hit a 700+

Re: In the figure above, the point on segment PQ that is twice a [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jan 2013, 01:11

3

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

I think with questions like these, the test writers are testing whether you'd quickly jump to using an algebraic approach, which in this case is much more time consuming, as compared to making the answer choices a part of your toolbox for finding the correct answer.. The question itself tells us we need to split the line into 3 equal parts with the asked coordinate being 2 parts away from P A quick glance at the graph gives us the slope of 1, which easily shows us which points will cover the three segments P(0,-1) --> (1,0) --> (2,1) --> Q(3,2) Thus (2,1) being twice as far from P as from Q

True, an algebraic approach might be required for more complex problems where the slope isn't easily determined or the line segment might be split into a different ratio, but this question isn't testing that

Re: In the figure above, the point on segment PQ that is twice a [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Aug 2013, 00:41

1

This post received KUDOS

Coordinates of point P = (0,-1) Coordinates of point Q = (3,2) Point required to be found is on segment PQ that is twice as far from P as from Q So, adding (2,2) to point P (0,-1) Answer = B = (2,1)
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...