|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Eternal Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 484
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
In the figure( attatchment), if PQRS is a square, PT is [#permalink]
12 Jul 2003, 07:02
In the figure( attatchment), if PQRS is a square, PT is perpendicular to QT, QT=3, and PT=4, then RT=
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
IMHO: RT = sqrt 58
correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eternal Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 484
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
How did you get it? [#permalink]
13 Jul 2003, 08:04
Can I see an artwork from you , how did you get it right?
SQ RT of 58 is correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
My rationale is to create a bigger square that embraces the given one. The points P, Q, R, and S touch the sides of the bigger square but not bisect them! They share each side of the bigger square by 4:3; this fact is clear from the information that PT is perpendicular to QT, QT=3, and PT=4.
Further, you have to see that the right vertical side of the bigger square is 7, and the bottom one is shared 4:3, maiking it possible to find RT via the right triangle (7-3-RT).
RT^2=7^2+3^2
RT=sqrt 58.
The trick is that a small square is inscribed into a bigger one, not bysecting the sides of the latter, but splitting them into a 4:3 proportion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eternal Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 484
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
I agree with your logic, thanks!
How has Moscow grown over the years?
VT
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
Moscow is enormous now. It is a different country if you compare it with other Russia. Moscow is one of the richest cities of the world, and one of the most expensive ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
In the figure ( attachment), PQRS, initially in position I,
|
Curly05 |
3 |
12 Jul 2003, 06:53 |
|
|
|
In the figure below, if isosceles right angle PQR has an
|
mirhaque |
10 |
19 Jun 2004, 09:56 |
|
|
|
Is this figure a square? (There was a drawing of a square
|
sdanquah |
11 |
15 Sep 2004, 09:30 |
|
|
|
In the figure above, if PQRS is a square and QT = TR, which
|
Avis |
2 |
26 Feb 2006, 10:45 |
|
|
|
In the figure above, is quadrilateral PQRS a parallelogram?
|
gluon |
2 |
12 Oct 2007, 12:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|