Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Young gun, can you explain further? I can't seem to get that without an assumption.
sure, you know from the coords of point P, the left triangle is a 30-60-90...using that, you can figure out that the radius of the circle is 2. then using the same method you can solve the Q1 triangle, with hypotenuse of 2, using the 30-60-90 features, since you know the angle closest to origin in Q1 is 30.
makes sense?
what i could find from the stem is S^2+T^2=4, and the other part is just assumption as young_gun described.
hmm, is it just the assumption that we can reach the answer using?
yeh. thanks beckee.
Thx guys. My main issue was w/ the diagram. I was under the impression that you can use the diagram to make any assumptions as long as it didn't say "Not drawn to scale". As the 90 angle is bisected by the Y axis, i thought it was a 45 degree angle. Clearly, i was wrong in making this assumption.
So, what's the offical "rule" for diagrams then?
Last edited by Skewed on 25 Oct 2007, 12:35, edited 1 time in total.
Thx guys. My main issue was w/ the diagram. I was under the impression that you can use the diagram to make any assumptions as long as it didn't say "Not drawn to scale". As the 90 angle is bisected by the Y axis, i thought it was a 45 degree angle. Clearly, i was wrong in making this assumption.
So, what's the offical "rule" about diagrams then?
never assume anything about any diagram unless otherwise stated in the statement. all the diagramms in gmat PS are not for scale.
i also got 1.. created another picture - hopefully makes more sense!
Ok this diagram is freaking me out.
(1) Here OP and OQ are the radius of the circle with center at O. If OP = OQ = 2 then angle OPQ = angle OQP = 45, correct?
(2) From Beckee's diagram I can see that angle OPQ = 30 and angle OQP = 60 must be right. But, if OPQ is a 30 - 60 - 90 triangle then how can the sides facing the 30 degree and 60 degree angle be both of the same length?
ok guys so i understand now that the left triangle can be a 30-60-90 triangle and thus the radius will have to be 2. but then how do we assume that the triangle to the right is also a 30-60-90 triangle?
i also got 1.. created another picture - hopefully makes more sense!
Ok this diagram is freaking me out.
(1) Here OP and OQ are the radius of the circle with center at O. If OP = OQ = 2 then angle OPQ = angle OQP = 45, correct?
(2) From Beckee's diagram I can see that angle OPQ = 30 and angle OQP = 60 must be right. But, if OPQ is a 30 - 60 - 90 triangle then how can the sides facing the 30 degree and 60 degree angle be both of the same length?
So what is going wrong with my understanding?
Killersqurirrel, bkk145, anyone? How can a 30 - 60 - 90 triangle OPQ have two sides OP = OQ = 2?
To my calculation the answer is D means square root of 3, means 3 raise to the power 1/2 and its very quick to calculate.
Since OP and OQ both are radius of same circle, their points on circle are also same but with different quadrant. So for point Q the co-ordinates will be (+ sq. root of 3, 1)
but I encountered this question several times before and I got it wrong again.
Beckee illustration makes sense.
But from the official diagram, IF we are NOT allowed to assume that the "Y-line" bisects the right 90 degree angle, then why are we asked to assume that the Y-line is the Y-axis, and the x-line is the x-axis?
For all that I know, the arrow lines show/define the directions of x and y ONLY. By convention, an x/y coordinate drawing must include tick marks on the actual x/y axis(s). Without the actual definition of the axis(s), the center O could be of coordinates (.5,-10) or whatever.
You have 3 triangles. Left, Center and Right and all are right angled
Left triangle we know the sides x=sqrt(3) and y=1
We know that 30-60-90 is 1-sqrt(3)-2
So the angle of the left triangle, the angle that is part of the center, is 30.
Then 180-30-90=60
So we know that the Right triangle is a 30-60-90 Right angled triangle and we know the hypotenuse which is 2 which is the radius
So we find that s=1 and t=sqrt(3)
I don't agree with beckee529's picture. You can draw this only when the Left and Right triangles are 45 degrees right angled
I just want to add some additional info to further my contention that this question is "bogus".
According to the instruction from the gmatprep software and the official gmac materials, to paraphrase: "diagrams and figures are drawn as accurately as possible".
And from the princeton review 2007, page 155. It states that: unless a diagram is marked "not drawn to scale", it is drawn "as accurately as possible".
This question does not have the "not drawn to scale" disclaimer. Thus, it would completely reasonable and within the GMAC rule to safely "assume" that a equilateral triangle would form if you draw a line from point P to point Q, and that line PQ is parallel to the x-axis. Thus D could be the correct answer.