Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

C Let angle RSQ = S1 = RQS Let angle RTP = T Let angle TSU = S2 = SUT

S1 + S2 + X = 180.....................1 In triangle TSU we have S2 + s2 + T = 180 2s2 + T = 180 ........................2

In triangle PRT we have P + R + T = 180 90 + T + (180 - 2S1) = 180 (angle R is calculated from triangle RQS) or 2S2 + 2S1 = 270 or S1 + S2 = 135 Put it in eq 1 135 + X = 180 X = 45.

Ive noticed that most of the times when information given is very little in gmat questions, the problem requires a conceptual approach, and its usually easier to solve with principles (rules of triangles in this case) rather than taking variables or numbers.

I will just share how i solved it mentally

Sttmt 1) only gives triangle RQS is isoceles, obviously cannot find x Sttmt 2) Again,... gives that triangle STU is isoceles, not sufficient.

Combining since the big triangle is right angled, Angles QRS and STU are complementary, ie their sum is also 90......(I) the two smaller triangles RQS and STU are isoceles, so Angle rqs = rsq and Angles tsu = tus in each of the smaller triangles, if the sum of two angles qrs + stu = 90 (from I above), then sum of the other two pairs should also be 90 ie. rqs + rsq + tsu + tus = 90

or 2rsq + 2 tsu = 90

As soon as we know this, we know we can solve for x, because we are getting rsq + tsu. so dont even need to calculate beyond this.

It may look complicated at the first glance (if you look at the wordiness of the explanation) , but really it is very easy if you try make images in your mind and solve.

[in each of the smaller triangles, if the sum of two angles qrs + stu = 90 (from I above), then sum of the other two pairs should also be 90 ie. rqs + rsq + tsu + tus = 90 .[/quote]

I didn't get this statement. how the sum of other two pairs is equal to 90, it should be 270

(the sum of all the angles of two smaller triangles is 360, if take the complementary angles out then the sum becomes 270). Kindly correct me if I am wrong. _________________

I didn't get this statement. how the sum of other two pairs is equal to 90, it should be 270

(the sum of all the angles of two smaller triangles is 360, if take the complementary angles out then the sum becomes 270). Kindly correct me if I am wrong.

Yes, you are right, should be 270.

I didn't do the calculations, because we were not required to find the value of x, thus, the calculation error sorry for the inconvenience though.

Ive noticed that most of the times when information given is very little in gmat questions, the problem requires a conceptual approach, and its usually easier to solve with principles (rules of triangles in this case) rather than taking variables or numbers.

I will just share how i solved it mentally

Sttmt 1) only gives triangle RQS is isoceles, obviously cannot find x Sttmt 2) Again,... gives that triangle STU is isoceles, not sufficient.

Combining since the big triangle is right angled, Angles QRS and STU are complementary, ie their sum is also 90......(I) the two smaller triangles RQS and STU are isoceles, so Angle rqs = rsq and Angles tsu = tus in each of the smaller triangles, if the sum of two angles qrs + stu = 90 (from I above), then sum of the other two pairs should also be 90 ie. rqs + rsq + tsu + tus = 90

or 2rsq + 2 tsu = 90

As soon as we know this, we know we can solve for x, because we are getting rsq + tsu. so dont even need to calculate beyond this.

It may look complicated at the first glance (if you look at the wordiness of the explanation) , but really it is very easy if you try make images in your mind and solve.

I know this is a few years old but could someone help me with the problem? I am trying to wrap my head around the bolded part. What sum of two pairs are we really talking about? Because how I am understanding this shouldn't rqs+rsq+tsu+tus=180? (I know that the calculation was corrected to 270 in another post). I don't understand how that calculation above would equal to 270. I understand the explanation all up until this part where I just get confused and would like to understand this conceptually for any similiar future problems. Please help. Thanks.

Ive noticed that most of the times when information given is very little in gmat questions, the problem requires a conceptual approach, and its usually easier to solve with principles (rules of triangles in this case) rather than taking variables or numbers.

I will just share how i solved it mentally

Sttmt 1) only gives triangle RQS is isoceles, obviously cannot find x Sttmt 2) Again,... gives that triangle STU is isoceles, not sufficient.

Combining since the big triangle is right angled, Angles QRS and STU are complementary, ie their sum is also 90......(I) the two smaller triangles RQS and STU are isoceles, so Angle rqs = rsq and Angles tsu = tus in each of the smaller triangles, if the sum of two angles qrs + stu = 90 (from I above), then sum of the other two pairs should also be 90 ie. rqs + rsq + tsu + tus = 90

or 2rsq + 2 tsu = 90

As soon as we know this, we know we can solve for x, because we are getting rsq + tsu. so dont even need to calculate beyond this.

It may look complicated at the first glance (if you look at the wordiness of the explanation) , but really it is very easy if you try make images in your mind and solve.

I know this is a few years old but could someone help me with the problem? I am trying to wrap my head around the bolded part. What sum of two pairs are we really talking about? Because how I am understanding this shouldn't rqs+rsq+tsu+tus=180? (I know that the calculation was corrected to 270 in another post). I don't understand how that calculation above would equal to 270. I understand the explanation all up until this part where I just get confused and would like to understand this conceptually for any similiar future problems. Please help. Thanks.

In the figure shown, what is the value of x?

x+<QSR+<UST=180 (straight line =180) and <R+<T=90 (as PRT is right angle)

(1) The length of line segment QR is equal to the length of line segment RS --> QRS is isosceles --> <RQS=<QSR=(180-R)/2 (as <RQS+<QSR+<R=180 --> 2<QSR+<R=180 --> <QSR=(180-R)/2). Not sufficient.

(2) The legnth of line segment ST is equal to the length of line segment TU --> UST is isosceles --> <SUT=<UST=(180-T)/2. Not sufficient.

The Stanford interview is an alumni-run interview. You give Stanford your current address and they reach out to alumni in your area to find one that can interview you...

Originally, I was supposed to have an in-person interview for Yale in New Haven, CT. However, as I mentioned in my last post about how to prepare for b-school interviews...

Interested in applying for an MBA? In the fourth and final part of our live QA series with guest expert Chioma Isiadinso, co-founder of consultancy Expartus and former admissions...