|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 62
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
In the industrialized nations, the last century has [#permalink]
28 Jun 2007, 13:32
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In the industrialized nations, the last century has witnessed a shortening of the average workday from twelve hours or longer to less than eight hours. Mindful of this enormous increase in leisure time over the past century, many people assume that the same trend has obtained throughout history, and that, therefore, prehistoric humans must have labored incessantly for their very survival.
We cannot, of course, directly test this assumption. However, a study of primitive peoples of today suggests a different conclusion. The Mbuti of central Africa, for instance, spend only a few hours each day in hunting, gathering, and tending to other economic necessities. The rest of their time is spent as they choose. The implication is that the short workday is not peculiar to industrialized societies. Rather, both the extended workday of 1880 and the shorter workday of today are products of different stages of the continuing process of industrialization.
10. Which of the following, if true, would most greatly strengthen the argument made in the passage above?
(A) In recent decades, the economy of the Mbuti has been markedly affected by the encroachment of modern civilization.
(B) The life-style of the Mbuti is similar to that of prehistoric humans.
(C) The Mbuti have no words in their language to express the distinction between work activities and leisure activities.
(D) The workday of a European peasant in medieval times averaged between eleven and fifteen hours.
(E) The members of the Shaklik tribe in central Asia have an average workday of ten to twelve hours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 242
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
for me is A
B is weakening the argument
C is out of the scope
D is totally out of scope
E makes a prallelel comparison that does not bring force to the argument
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 62
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
crazy123 wrote: In the industrialized nations, the last century has witnessed a shortening of the average workday from twelve hours or longer to less than eight hours. Mindful of this enormous increase in leisure time over the past century, many people assume that the same trend has obtained throughout history, and that, therefore, prehistoric humans must have labored incessantly for their very survival. We cannot, of course, directly test this assumption. However, a study of primitive peoples of today suggests a different conclusion. The Mbuti of central Africa, for instance, spend only a few hours each day in hunting, gathering, and tending to other economic necessities. The rest of their time is spent as they choose. The implication is that the short workday is not peculiar to industrialized societies. Rather, both the extended workday of 1880 and the shorter workday of today are products of different stages of the continuing process of industrialization.
10. Which of the following, if true, would most greatly strengthen the argument made in the passage above?
(A) In recent decades, the economy of the Mbuti has been markedly affected by the encroachment of modern civilization. (B) The life-style of the Mbuti is similar to that of prehistoric humans. (C) The Mbuti have no words in their language to express the distinction between work activities and leisure activities. (D) The workday of a European peasant in medieval times averaged between eleven and fifteen hours. (E) The members of the Shaklik tribe in central Asia have an average workday of ten to twelve hours.
I thought it was A too but the OA is B. I haven't understood why though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 171
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Definitely B.
A here actually weakens the argument.
The argument is based on the assumption that the Mbuti are comparable to prehistoric people. It starts off by saying that people assume that the trend of shorter workdays is applicable to prehistoric humans. Obviously, prehistoric people cannot be studied now, so the author uses the example of the Mbuti to frame his conclusion.
If A is true, then the conclusion is weakened, because it means that the Mbuti have been influenced by modern civilization. Therefore, it is not comparable to prehistoric people.
B states exactly what we're looking for. That the two -- prehistoric people and the Mbuti -- are comparable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 277
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 2
|
B.
'However, a study of primitive peoples of today suggests a different conclusion'
The conclusion is: prehistoric people are not working all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
In the industrialized nations, the last century has
|
dj |
15 |
11 Oct 2004, 17:17 |
|
|
|
In the industrialized nations, the last century has
|
rahulraao |
10 |
19 Sep 2005, 03:46 |
|
|
|
In the industrialized nations, the last century has
|
mahesh004 |
6 |
19 Nov 2005, 10:03 |
|
|
|
In the industrialized nations, the last century has
|
myc2004 |
3 |
01 Apr 2006, 13:55 |
|
|
|
In the industrialized nations, the last century has
|
az780 |
9 |
04 Dec 2007, 15:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|