Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Oct 2014, 00:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 175
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [2] , given: 10

In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many [#permalink] New post 30 May 2010, 09:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:16) correct 45% (01:26) wrong based on 371 sessions
In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many of the great works of Antiquity. They maintained these works in their libraries and spent many hours transcribing them for distribution to other monasteries. However, last week a Classics scholar discovered that a monk had consistently miscopied a word while transcribing Plato's Republic, thereby altering the meaning of the entire text. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.

The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?
A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by fameatop on 22 Aug 2013, 22:22, edited 1 time in total.
OA not provided
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 20

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 30 May 2010, 09:14
I would go with D. This is strongly related to the conclusion.
_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Download the Ultimate SC Flashcards

Current Student
avatar
Affiliations: ?
Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Location: Africa/Europe
Schools: Kellogg; Ross ($$); Tuck
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 6

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 30 May 2010, 10:10
For me it's A or E.

One monk made a mistake and the result is ALL subsequent copies will be corrected. was this monk the only one to make the subsequent copies? mabe a copy existed before the Middle Ages....

If this monk made all the copies, can we traced them back for correction?..hum

I think I will go for A

OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 437
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 16

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 30 May 2010, 21:04
IMO C
_________________

Never give up,,,

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 175
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 10

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 31 May 2010, 20:54
mirzohidjon wrote:
IMO C

the OA is E
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 956
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 735 [0], given: 40

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 31 May 2010, 22:13
Please dont post the OA so early.

IMO E.
This is an Defender Assumption based question.

When you read the stimulus you will find that the author has presented his views fairly without missing some key assumptions. But, in the end, he makes a broad generalization based conclusion. We are asked to support the conclusion with an additional premise which is stated in E.

E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.

If you negate this, it will become:
All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic cannot be traced back to the flawed copy.

If the copies cannot be traced back then how can all copies be corrected. The conclusion fals apart.


dixitraghav wrote:
In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many of the great works of Antiquity. They maintained these works in their libraries and spent many hours transcribing them for distribution to other monasteries. However, last week a Classics scholar discovered that a monk had consistently miscopied a word while transcribing Plato's Republic, thereby altering the meaning of the entire text. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.

The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?

A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.

_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 44
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2013, 07:01
ykaiim wrote:
Please dont post the OA so early.

IMO E.
This is an Defender Assumption based question.

When you read the stimulus you will find that the author has presented his views fairly without missing some key assumptions. But, in the end, he makes a broad generalization based conclusion. We are asked to support the conclusion with an additional premise which is stated in E.

E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.

If you negate this, it will become:
All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic cannot be traced back to the flawed copy.

If the copies cannot be traced back then how can all copies be corrected. The conclusion fals apart.


dixitraghav wrote:
In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many of the great works of Antiquity. They maintained these works in their libraries and spent many hours transcribing them for distribution to other monasteries. However, last week a Classics scholar discovered that a monk had consistently miscopied a word while transcribing Plato's Republic, thereby altering the meaning of the entire text. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.

The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?

A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.


Lets look at A

Lets say some copies of Plato's republic predates Middle ages , that means "NOT ALL" copies needs to be replaced and again the conclusion is destroyed. What do you have to say about it ?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 88
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 95

Re: In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2013, 07:30
dixitraghav wrote:
In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many of the great works of Antiquity. They maintained these works in their libraries and spent many hours transcribing them for distribution to other monasteries. However, last week a Classics scholar discovered that a monk had consistently miscopied a word while transcribing Plato's Republic, thereby altering the meaning of the entire text. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.

The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?

A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.



A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages. At least one copy, prior to the mistake copy, has to exist or it's unlikely that the mistake would have been found.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected. The question stem only covers Plato's Republic.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text. Again already covered in the question stem.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week. Stated in the question stem.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy. Not previous included in the question stem. The fact all copies can be traced to the flawed copy is important information supporting the conclusion.
_________________

I do not beg for kudos.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 21

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2013, 01:56
smartmanav wrote:
ykaiim wrote:
Please dont post the OA so early.

IMO E.
This is an Defender Assumption based question.

When you read the stimulus you will find that the author has presented his views fairly without missing some key assumptions. But, in the end, he makes a broad generalization based conclusion. We are asked to support the conclusion with an additional premise which is stated in E.

E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.

If you negate this, it will become:
All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic cannot be traced back to the flawed copy.

If the copies cannot be traced back then how can all copies be corrected. The conclusion fals apart.


dixitraghav wrote:
In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many of the great works of Antiquity. They maintained these works in their libraries and spent many hours transcribing them for distribution to other monasteries. However, last week a Classics scholar discovered that a monk had consistently miscopied a word while transcribing Plato's Republic, thereby altering the meaning of the entire text. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.

The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?

A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.


Lets look at A

Lets say some copies of Plato's republic predates Middle ages , that means "NOT ALL" copies needs to be replaced and again the conclusion is destroyed. What do you have to say about it ?



The author clearly mentioned 'All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.' The copies which are prior to medival age need not be corrected.

But i dont think that E is correct one too... the author simply stated that books need to be corrected, how these books can be corrected, is it possible or not is out of scope here
Expert Post
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Location: Cambridge, MA
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 2

Re: kaplan test [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2013, 18:12
Expert's post
adityapagadala wrote:
The author clearly mentioned 'All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.' The copies which are prior to medival age need not be corrected.

But i dont think that E is correct one too... the author simply stated that books need to be corrected, how these books can be corrected, is it possible or not is out of scope here

The author thinks the books must be corrected because of an error in a single medieval copy. If some books didn't stem from that copy, then those books won't have the monk's error, and won't need correcting! Thus, the information in choice (E) is necessary for the author's conclusion to hold--without it, we have no reason to fix any copies that trace their lineage to a different monastery.

Hope this helps!
_________________

Eli Meyer
Kaplan Teacher
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course!

Image

Kaplan Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bouncing back from failure
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 100
Schools: Wharton,MIT, Tepper, Kelly,
WE 1: 7 years- Service Managament, poject Management, Business Consultant- Retail
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

Reviews Badge
Re: In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many [#permalink] New post 27 May 2014, 00:55
dixitraghav wrote:
In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many of the great works of Antiquity. They maintained these works in their libraries and spent many hours transcribing them for distribution to other monasteries. However, last week a Classics scholar discovered that a monk had consistently miscopied a word while transcribing Plato's Republic, thereby altering the meaning of the entire text. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected.

The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise?
A. No copy of Plato's Republic predates the Middle Ages.
B. Only Plato's Republic needs to be corrected.
C. A single word can alter the meaning of an entire text.
D. No one had ever noticed the mistake before last week.
E. All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy.


"All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic will now have to be corrected" - author's reasoning of the correction. Author is not concluding on how to implement the correction.
However, option E -"All subsequent copies of Plato's Republic can be traced back to the flawed copy" this option tells how to implement the fix. and Implementing the correction is out of scope.

Please help me to understand.
Re: In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many   [#permalink] 27 May 2014, 00:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Possessive Poison Rule: Possessive Nouns can only serve as izaidi 5 12 Jul 2010, 20:12
The Cathedrals of the Middle Ages were community centers cici 2 20 Mar 2009, 07:15
Begun as late as middle age, a diet restricting calories but GHIBI 1 16 Jan 2008, 05:48
1 In the Middle Ages philosophers were so devoted to Aristotle iamba 10 02 Jun 2007, 10:19
The Cathedrals of the Middle Ages were community centers gamjatang 10 03 Oct 2005, 00:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the Middle Ages, monks possessed the only copies of many

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.