|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1082
Followers: 508
Kudos [?]:
1052
[1] , given: 131
|
Re: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and [#permalink]
15 Mar 2013, 09:23
1
This post received KUDOS
shamilshah22 wrote: egmat wrote: droopy57 wrote: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care workers will increase significantly worldwide. Even so, the average compensation received by such professional will not decline but rather is likely to increase. This is due, at least partly, to the fact that the median age of the world’s population will increase steadily in this same period of time.
The argument above depends logically upon which of the following assumptions?
(A) The increase in the number of health care workers will be responsible for the increase in the average life span (B) The compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will increase more than that of other health care workers (C) As a group, older people receive more attention from health care workers than do younger people. (D) Geriatrics, a branch of medicine focusing on the health problems of older people, is the most expensive element of American health care. (E) Increase in the median age of the population will occur in all regions of the world. Hi, To find out the assumption, we first need to find out the premises and the conclusion to locate the gaps. Premise: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care workers will increase significantly worldwide. Premise: median age of the world’s population will increase steadily in this same period of time Conclusion/Prediction: the average compensation received by such professional will not decline but rather is likely to increase I think some of the confusion could have been in identifying the conclusion. It's not stated directly using keywords like therefore, as a result etc. Rather, it's written in a counter observation style "Even so,...". This makes it quite tricky to identify it as the conclusion. However, reading the third statement gives us a clue that the second statement is indeed a conclusion. This is because the third statement tries to explain the second one, while the first statement is treated more or less a factual or certain statement. Now, after the conclusion has been identified, we can either move directly to the options or pre-think what could be an assumption. The strategy advised by e-GMAT is pre-thinking. So, let's try to pre-think an assumption: It says that number of workers will increase and the conclusion is that their average compensation will also increase. We know that increase in compensation could either be the result of increased number of work hours or increased payment per hour. So, older people should either provide more work to these workers or provide more payment for the same amount of time. The first part i.e. more work, is what is given in option C. Therefore, this is the correct choice. For completion, let's look at other choices too: (A) The increase in the number of health care workers will be responsible for the increase in the average life span - Incorrect. No confusions.(B) The compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will increase more than that of other health care workers - We are talking about doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers as a group in the passage while this statement treats them differently. This statement will not even fit in the argument. Incorrect.(D) Geriatrics, a branch of medicine focusing on the health problems of older people, is the most expensive element of American health care. - We are not talking about America specifically. Incorrect.(E) Increase in the median age of the population will occur in all regions of the world. - What if this doesn't occur and only Japanese age? Can't workers salaries increase in that case? If salaries in rest of the world remain constant while salaries in Japan rise, average salary will increase. Since negation of this statement doesn't invalidate the conclusion, this is not an assumption.Hope this helps  Let me know if further clarity is required. You may also want to attend the event this weekend to learn how to improve by up to 70 points in 25 days.  Thanks, Chiranjeev Chiranjeev, I agree that all except C are not answers. But still difficult to understand why C is answer... C says Older people "receive" more attention from health care workers....!! don't you think it should be "require" instead of " receives"?? Because IMO C option means workers pay more attention towards older people than younger people...!! Please explain... Hi, I agree with you that technically it should be "require" instead of "receive". The demand of doctors exist due to the requirement of the people, not due to preferences of the doctors themselves. Technically, you are right. However, there are two reasons in support of option C: 1. As we have seen, there is no better option than C. 2. There is nothing to suggest that doctors pay unnecessary attention to older people. I mean it would be a safe assumption to say that doctors generally provide attention per requirements of the patients, not because doctors have soft corner for the older people. Now, since more attention is paid to these older people, more doctors are required for the same number of patients. Therefore, there will be increased demand for the doctors. Thanks, Chiranjeev
_________________
Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions) Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 63
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR- healthcare [#permalink]
15 Mar 2013, 10:42
The question states that the salary of medical professions would increase and towards the end also states that this is because the median age of people would increase world wide. This means that more attention is given to the people who are aged than those who are young. Therefore, the more the median age "worldwide", more the health problems, more the attention, more would be the requirement of health care professionals and more would be the salary. If you now read C, everything falls in place! Hence, C is the correct answer!
_________________
One Last Shot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 102
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 17
|
Re: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and [#permalink]
15 Mar 2013, 11:34
droopy57 wrote: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care workers will increase significantly worldwide. Even so, the average compensation received by such professional will not decline but rather is likely to increase. This is due, at least partly, to the fact that the median age of the world’s population will increase steadily in this same period of time.
The argument above depends logically upon which of the following assumptions?
(A) The increase in the number of health care workers will be responsible for the increase in the average life span (B) The compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will increase more than that of other health care workers (C) As a group, older people receive more attention from health care workers than do younger people. (D) Geriatrics, a branch of medicine focusing on the health problems of older people, is the most expensive element of American health care. (E) Increase in the median age of the population will occur in all regions of the world. I did not like any of the options. C was the most closer one but it yet assumes that Median age = Old age
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 90
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.2
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
36
[0], given: 3
|
Re: CR- healthcare [#permalink]
15 Mar 2013, 12:00
Hello TehJay, I find this problem very odd. It is not written in a logical manner. For example, it is not necessary that an increase in the number of elderly people would translate into an increase in income in future. The increase could be associated with an increase in the cost of procedures etc. There seems to be a jump in logic here. However, you got option d perfectly right. The argument talks about the situation around the globe while option d focuses on USA. Hence, d is out of the picture. Let us analyze b and c. (B) The compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will increase more than that of other health care workers You are right in saying that one the compensation of treating the elderly might be more for one group which might increase the average income. However, we do not know for sure whether the compensation for treating elderly will increase only for one particular group or all groups. We do not need to know the relative increase in the compensation for various fields of profession. However, if you are still unsure of which option is the assumption, you can do the negation test. Negating option B would imply that the compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will not increase more than that of other health care workers. However, the income of health care workers will increase rapidly when compared to the income of doctors and therapists. Hence, there will be a net increase irrespective of the amount/percentage by which they income grows. Thus, irrespective of the information stated in this option, the net income will increase. (C) As a group, older people receive more attention from health care workers than do younger people. If the older people receive more attention from health care workers then they would have to visit the hospitals more and would in return ensure than the income of health care workers increase. This would lead to an overall increase in the income. Hope this helps! Let me know if I can help you any further. TehJay wrote: The assumption seems to be that the doctors who work with older patients will earn an increasing amount of money, thus raising the average earnings per doctor despite there being more doctors. But (B), (C), and (D) all seem to speak to this fact, and I couldn't really determine between them.
(B) The compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will increase more than that of other health care workers
Seems like exactly what I was looking for, and this is the answer I picked.
(C) As a group, older people receive more attention from health care workers than do younger people.
As the median age goes up, the doctors who work primarily with older people will get more business -> make more money -> increase the average. Seems to fit as well (and apparently is the OA)
(D) Geriatrics, a branch of medicine focusing on the health problems of older people, is the most expensive element of American health care.
More older people means there are more people who need to pay for geriatrics, which is the most expensive element -> the doctors who specialize in geriatrics will earn an increasing wage, improving the average. I think the key to this one is that it specifies AMERICAN health care, while the original argument was WORLDWIDE.
But why is (C) better than (B)? They both seem like perfectly legit answers.
_________________
Thanks Kris Instructor at Aspire4GMAT
Visit us at http://www.aspire4gmat.com
Post your queries Join our free GMAT course
New blog: How to get that 700+ New blog: Data Sufficiency Tricks
Press Kudos if this helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 36
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 3
|
Re: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and [#permalink]
14 May 2013, 00:06
droopy57 wrote: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care workers will increase significantly worldwide. Even so, the average compensation received by such professional will not decline but rather is likely to increase. This is due, at least partly, to the fact that the median age of the world’s population will increase steadily in this same period of time.
The argument above depends logically upon which of the following assumptions?
(A) The increase in the number of health care workers will be responsible for the increase in the average life span (B) The compensation of doctors and physical therapists who treat the elderly will increase more than that of other health care workers (C) As a group, older people receive more attention from health care workers than do younger people. (D) Geriatrics, a branch of medicine focusing on the health problems of older people, is the most expensive element of American health care. (E) Increase in the median age of the population will occur in all regions of the world. my take is as follows: prephrase answer: there should be either more number of ppl who come to clincis should increase or existing doctorsshould leave jops, later is not possilbe so look for choice which says first. only c has such thing rest of options are not even contenders. Kudos pls if answer satisfies ur doubts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and [#permalink]
18 May 2013, 03:39
Premise#1: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care workers will increase significantly worldwide Premise#2: Even so, the average compensation received by such professional will not decline but rather is likely to increase Conclusion: This is due, at least partly, to the fact that the median age of the world’s population will increase steadily in this same period of time.
Assumption (unstated premise): Older people need more care than the younger one (C) Assumption (defending strategy): Negating any other cause of increasing compensation in time of increasing number of health professionals, e.g. world economic growth (not applicable in this case)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: In the next four years, the number of doctors, nurses, and
[#permalink]
18 May 2013, 03:39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|