Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Sep 2014, 20:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2006, 17:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of treatment, which are known to be effective though they are expensive and painful. An increasing percentage is being spent on nonstandard treatments, which cause little discomfort. Unfortunately, the nonstandard treatments have proved to be ineffective. Obviously, less money is being spent on effective treatments of disease X than was spent ten years ago.

Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

(A) Varieties of disease X requiring expensive special treatment have become less common during the past decade.

(B) Nonstandard methods of treating disease X are more expensive now than they were a decade ago.

(C) Of total medical expenditures, the percentage that is due to treatment of disease X increased during the past decade.

(D) Most of the money spent on treating disease X during the last decade went to pay for nonstandard treatments.

(E) The total amount of money spent on treating disease X slowly declined during the past decade.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2006, 20:40
anyone wanna try?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 728
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2006, 23:50
D for me on this one
less money is being spent on effective treatments of disease X than was spent ten years ago

decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of treatment, which are known to be effective though they are expensive and painful. An increasing percentage is being spent on nonstandard treatments, which cause little discomfort.
on the first sight the information is sufficientm but we don't know
what was the ratio of money spendings for traditional med to money spendings for notraditional medicine.
For example if the ratio was 90 to 10 , and after increasing investments in notraditional medicine it became 60 to 40 than coclusion is wrong.
So I think D it is because it gives us information about money sharing between trad med abd notrad medicine
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2006, 23:55
Going with B

In the argument.. both standard and non-standard treatments saw increase in spending, yet the author says " less money is being spent on effective treatments of disease X than was spent ten years ago."

This implies that the cost of non-standard treatments has gone up.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2006, 00:45
I'm going with E on this one.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2006, 01:12
Going for (E) here
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2006, 02:31
I'll go for D here...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 291
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2006, 05:14
Going with D
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 582
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2006, 05:39
(1)decreasing percentage money for effective treatment
(2)increasing % for uneffective treatment
(conclusion) less money for (1)

To draw the conclusion correctly, we have to say that the total amount hasn't increase. In such case, the amount of money cd have increase. (E) it is.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 754
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2006, 14:22
I'll vote for (E) ... OA please ...
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2006, 14:26
OA is E here..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2006, 17:18
karlfurt wrote:
(1)decreasing percentage money for effective treatment
(2)increasing % for uneffective treatment
(conclusion) less money for (1)

To draw the conclusion correctly, we have to say that the total amount hasn't increase. In such case, the amount of money cd have increase. (E) it is.

Brilliant analysis Karl !
I fell for the trap and chose (D).
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2006, 23:04
karlfurt wrote:
(1)decreasing percentage money for effective treatment
(2)increasing % for uneffective treatment
(conclusion) less money for (1)

To draw the conclusion correctly, we have to say that the total amount hasn't increase. In such case, the amount of money cd have increase. (E) it is.


Nice on Karl! I also fell for the D trap, but (E) makes sense after reading your explanation.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2006, 08:03
Late But E.

Decreasing percentage of money spent on X in the past decade ...

The money spent on X does not increase .....
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 368
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2006, 21:18
Can you please post the OE?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2006, 23:26
E does not make logical sense. We are talking about money allocation not about the amount of money. Money is being allocated to "nontraditional" not "ineffective" treatment. It is believed that traditional treatment is more effective than nontraditional treatment, but the money is still being spent on this disease.

I go with D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2006, 23:31
Now that I reread the paragraph, I actually believe that no one single answer is correct. D (which I believed was right) makes too broad of a statement (most money) we do not know the actual allocation.

A decreasing precentage of money, does not actually mean less money. We have to know more about the moving parts to deduce this. This is why I cannot agree with E.

A,B,C also make assumptions not answered in the statement above.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2006, 02:08
Late reply...E is the answer..
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

  [#permalink] 04 Sep 2006, 02:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
European nations are starting to decrease the percentage of Rock750 11 23 Mar 2013, 16:20
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic In the last decade there has been a significant decrease in betterscore 5 03 Aug 2012, 15:11
In the past decade, a decreasing % of money spent on joemama142000 9 04 Jan 2010, 16:39
In the past decade, rapid technological progress and a skim 4 08 Dec 2009, 01:18
1 DS: percentage increase/decrease TriColor 5 25 Aug 2009, 15:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.