GMATT73 wrote:
In the past most automobile companies minimized the weight of cars to reduce the cost of cars in their lines. The safest car seats were heavier, and auto companies equipped only the most expensive cars with these seats. This year, the cheapest cars in most automakers lines included the safest seats on the market.
The above argument most supports which of the following conclusions?
(A) Because of technological innovation, the safest car seat on the market this year weighed less than most of the other seats on the market.
(B) Last year`s best-selling car was the safest car on the market.
(C) Because the price of materials was higher than it had been in past years, all seats were more expensive to manufacture this year.
(D) Every car company has decided to make safety a higher priority than profit.
(E) The safest seat on the market this year was also the least expensive seat.
Question Type: Conclusion
Passage Stem: Doesnt explicitly make a conclusion. Premises are
(1) In the past, weight of care proportional to cost.
(2) In the past, Safe Seat = Heavy Seats and only in expensive cars
(3) This year, cheapest cars included the safest seats.
A: Not sure/confident to boot out AC. So keep it.
B: Out of Scope. Stems does not talk about "sales"/best-selling car.
C: Out of Scope. Nothing in stem talks about prices of material.
D: Totally Out of Scope. Prices Vs Safety decision made by auto mobile manufacturers.
E: Not Sure/confident to boot out AC.
Re-reading "E", we dont know that. Safest = cheapest this year? Its possible that we have less safer seats but less expensive than the safest seats.
After reading A, i'm convinced this conclusion is okay. Why:
1) cheaper = less weight. (2) But this year safest seats included in cheapest cars. Combining 1 and 2 we get our conclusion.