Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Aug 2014, 20:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the past, to run for one's country in the Olympics was

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
In the past, to run for one's country in the Olympics was [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2003, 18:03
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:16) wrong based on 1 sessions
In the past, to run for one's country in the Olympics was the ultimate achievement of any athlete. Nowadays, an athlete's motives are more and more influenced by financial gain, and consequently we do not see our best athletes in the Olympics, which is still only for amateurs.

Which of the following will most weaken the above conclusion?

A) The publicity and fame that can be achieved by competing in the Olympics makes athletes more "marketable" by agents and potential sponsors, while allowing the athletes to retain their amateur status.
B) The winning of a race is not as important as participating.
C) There is a widely held belief that our best Olympic athletes already receive enough in terms of promotion and sponsorship.
D) It has been suggested that professional athletes should be allowed to compete in the games.
E) Athletics as an entertainment is like any other entertainment job and deserves a financial reward.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 154
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2003, 07:27
I go for A.

By the way, what is the right answer?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2003, 09:12
Official answer: A
It is facts that athletes can attract sponsorship and make money and that participation in the Olympics can aid this process. On the basis that it is true that athletes are more and more attracted by the profit motive, the conclusion that the best athletes do not compete in the Olympics is weakened. Therefore, A is the appropriate answer. Alternative (B) is an oft-stated maxim, but in this case, it is not relevant to the argument. The fact that people believe that amateur athletes are receiving adequate alternative remuneration does not bear on the argument for allowing genuine professional athletes into the games. So, (C) is innappropriate. Choice (D) comes close to weakening the argument, because if professional (as well as amateur) athletes were allowed to compete, presuming the participants were selected on merit, then the best athletes would be seen. However, it has only been a suggestion, perhaps in the past, (in which case it was not adopted) or in the future (in which case its adoption is not certain). Choice (E) represents an opinion that might or might not be held by the writer, but, whether or not the author agrees, it does not weaken the argument; therefore (E) is inappropriate.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2004, 07:12
My addition to the explaination. The best athletes who participated in olympics still retain thye amature status. It is possible that those amature atheletes mentioned by the author may very well be best atheletes.
A combines all the points
  [#permalink] 05 Jan 2004, 07:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic In the past, to run for one's country in the Olympics skrishnakarthik 3 20 Sep 2013, 07:24
In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on ramiy 10 01 Aug 2009, 11:49
In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on adub35 4 14 Jun 2007, 15:27
In the past, the railroads in Ostronia were run as regional chunjuwu 26 14 Mar 2005, 00:24
In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on DLMD 17 05 Feb 2005, 20:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the past, to run for one's country in the Olympics was

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.