Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 04 May 2015, 15:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b)

Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) [#permalink]  10 Dec 2007, 15:44
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) and (c, d) equidistant from the origin?

(1) a/b = c/d

(2) sqrt(a^2) + sqrt(b^2) = sqrt(c^2) + sqrt(d^2)
Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2007
Posts: 32
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

I think it's C.

1) NS because it only tells us that the distances are proportional, e.g. 2, 3 : 4, 6..

2) NS because a = 2, b = 3, c=1, d=5 satisfies the condition but the points are not equidistant.

1&2) Sufficient
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

applecrisp wrote:
I think it's C.

1) NS because it only tells us that the distances are proportional, e.g. 2, 3 : 4, 6..

2) NS because a = 2, b = 3, c=1, d=5 satisfies the condition but the points are not equidistant.

1&2) Sufficient

How do you prove that 1 and 2 together are sufficient.
I am getting E
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1805
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 99 [1] , given: 0

1
KUDOS
(C) too for me

Equidistant to 0 means:
sqrt(a^2 + b^2) = sqrt(c^2 + d^2)

In other words, the points A(a,b) and C(c,d) are both on a same circle, centered at (0,0).

Stat1
a/b = c/d = 1/s where s is a real number different from 0.

That implies:
o b = s*a
o d = s*c

Could we see an anology? ... It's the equation of a line : y = s*x, passing by 0(0,0).

From here, we understand that, such points, can (sometimes) or cannot (most of time) be equidistant to 0.

o If a=-c and b=-d, we have the special case of equidistance. The line shares the points with a circle centered at 0(0,0)
o If a=c and d=d, both points are confused and so are equidistant to 0(0,0)
o All other cases are represented by the line y = s*x and do not create an equidistance (0 is out of the line )

INSUFF.

Stat2
o sqrt(a^2) + sqrt(b^2) = sqrt(c^2) + sqrt(d^2)
<=> |a| + |b| = |c| + |d|

We have 3 combinations:
o If |a| = |c|, then |b| = |d| that implies that A and B are in 4 possible points : the vertice of a square centered at 0(0,0)... (a,b), (-a,b), (a,-b) (-a,-b)
o If |a| = |d|, then |b| = |c| that implies that A and B are symetrical to the line y = x or on points rotated from 0(0,0) by k * 90° of these points (creating similar points in cadran 2, 3 and 4)... All of them are on a same circle centered at 0(0,0)
o All other cases : especially |b| = 0 and c!=0,d!=0... |a| = |c| + |d|

Concreate examples:
o If a=c=1 and b=d=0, then sqrt(a^2 + b^2) = sqrt(1+0)=1 and sqrt(c^2 + b^2) = sqrt(1+0) = 1.... equidistant to 0
o If a=2, b=0 and c=1 and d=1, then sqrt(a^2+b^2) = sqrt(2^2 + 0) = 2 and sqrt(c^2 + d^2) = sqrt(1 + 1) = sqrt(2).... not equidistant to 0

INSUFF.

Both 1 and 2
We have:
o b=s*a and d = s*c
o |a| + |b| = |c| + |d|

That implies:
o |a| + |s*a| = |c| + |s*c|
<=>(1+|s|)*|a| = (1+|s|)*|c|
<=> |a| = |c|

So,
o |a| + |b| = |c| + |d|
<=> |a| + |b| = |a| + |d|
<=> |b| = |d|

Bingo!... We are on the special case of:
o If |a| = |c|, then |b| = |d| that implies that A and B are in 4 possible points : the vertice of a square centered at 0(0,0)... (a,b), (-a,b), (a,-b) (-a,-b)

SUFF.
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Fig wrote:
(C) too for me

That implies:
o |a| + |s*a| = |c| + |s*c|
<=>(1+|s|)*|a| = (1+|s|)*|c|
<=> |a| = |c|
So,
o |a| + |b| = |c| + |d|
<=> |a| + |b| = |a| + |d|
<=> |b| = |d|

Bingo!... We are on the special case of:
o If |a| = |c|, then |b| = |d| that implies that A and B are in 4 possible points : the vertice of a square centered at 0(0,0)... (a,b), (-a,b), (a,-b) (-a,-b)

SUFF.

For some reason, I got stuck there. Thanks Fig. OA is C.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) 0 15 Aug 2013, 18:29
In a rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a,b) and 8 15 Nov 2008, 14:56
In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) 5 15 Jul 2008, 17:51
In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) 2 17 Dec 2007, 13:57
In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) 3 23 Aug 2007, 12:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b)

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.