Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: GMAT Prep Question 2 [#permalink]
21 Jun 2010, 15:33

6

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

In the sequence of positive numbers x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., what is the value of x_1?

(1) x_i=\frac{x_{(i-1)}}{2} for all integers i>1 --> we have the general formula connecting two consecutive terms (basically we have geometric progression with common ratio 1/2), but without the value of any term this info is insufficient to find x_1.

(2) x_5=\frac{x_4}{x_4+1} --> we have the relationship between x_5 and x_4, also insufficient to find x_1 (we cannot extrapolate the relationship between x_5 and x_4 to all consecutive terms in the sequence).

Re: GMAT Prep Question 2 [#permalink]
22 Jun 2010, 11:34

Expert's post

ruchichitral wrote:

why is it so that we are doing the (1/2) 3 times?

x_i=\frac{x_{(i-1)}}{2}, so every next term is preivious term times \frac{1}{2} --> x_4=x_3*\frac{1}{2}=x_2*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{2}=x_1*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{2}=x_1*(\frac{1}{2})^3. _________________

Re: GMAT Prep Question 2 [#permalink]
24 Aug 2010, 05:39

Thanks Bunuel,

But how do you account for the fact that x4 could be equal to zero.

By taking both the statements together, one of the solutions is also x4 = 0. It nowhere mentions in the question that the sequence has all distinct numbers. Or may be I am unaware that sequence is meant to consist of distinct numbers only.

Re: GMAT Prep Question 2 [#permalink]
24 Aug 2010, 05:45

Expert's post

jainsaurabh wrote:

Thanks Bunuel,

But how do you account for the fact that x4 could be equal to zero.

By taking both the statements together, one of the solutions is also x4 = 0. It nowhere mentions in the question that the sequence has all distinct numbers. Or may be I am unaware that sequence is meant to consist of distinct numbers only.

Stem says: "In the sequence of positive numbers ..." _________________

Re: In the sequence of positive numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., what [#permalink]
05 Jun 2013, 03:38

1 st.) Does not tell us anything. It only tells us the sequence formula and how each term in the sequence are related, but no numbers.

2 st.) Again this statement tells us the relation of X5 and X4, no real numbers. Not sufficient.

Combining two statements we see that according to the first formula X4+1=2 which means that X4=1. Solving it for X3=X2/2, X4=X2/4--->1=X2/4---> X2=4. X2=X1/2--->X1=8

The answer is C. _________________

If you found my post useful and/or interesting - you are welcome to give kudos!

Note : you will find two values of X1 from above quadratic equation i.e X1 = 0 and X1 = 8, since it is given that X1 is positive so we cant take X1=0 hence sufficient

Re: GMAT Prep Question 2 [#permalink]
26 Oct 2013, 13:30

Bunuel wrote:

In the sequence of positive numbers x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., what is the value of x_1?

(1) x_i=\frac{x_{(i-1)}}{2} for all integers i>1 --> we have the general formula connecting two consecutive terms (basically we have geometric progression with common ratio 1/2), but without the value of any term this info is insufficient to find x_1.

(2) x_5=\frac{x_4}{x_4+1} --> we have the relationship between x_5 and x_4, also insufficient to find x_1 (we cannot extrapolate the relationship between x_5 and x_4 to all consecutive terms in the sequence).

Re: GMAT Prep Question 2 [#permalink]
27 Oct 2013, 06:00

Expert's post

Raihanuddin wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

In the sequence of positive numbers x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., what is the value of x_1?

(1) x_i=\frac{x_{(i-1)}}{2} for all integers i>1 --> we have the general formula connecting two consecutive terms (basically we have geometric progression with common ratio 1/2), but without the value of any term this info is insufficient to find x_1.

(2) x_5=\frac{x_4}{x_4+1} --> we have the relationship between x_5 and x_4, also insufficient to find x_1 (we cannot extrapolate the relationship between x_5 and x_4 to all consecutive terms in the sequence).

I tried to do this by plugging in numbers and after 3+ minutes, I chose "Neither Suff" b/c I wasn't seeing any trends.

A and B are both insufficient because we don't have a starting point. When I combined, I still didn't see a starting point and went through the calculations only to realize that I STILL didn't have a starting point.

In retrospect, if I was to plug in numbers, what would be the better approach? Should I pick a number for say X5 and work backwards on both A and B or does picking numbers in this problem fail? It seemed to me that I could get MULTIPLE values since I could assign ANY value to X5 etc.?

I tried to do this by plugging in numbers and after 3+ minutes, I chose "Neither Suff" b/c I wasn't seeing any trends.

A and B are both insufficient because we don't have a starting point. When I combined, I still didn't see a starting point and went through the calculations only to realize that I STILL didn't have a starting point.

In retrospect, if I was to plug in numbers, what would be the better approach? Should I pick a number for say X5 and work backwards on both A and B or does picking numbers in this problem fail? It seemed to me that I could get MULTIPLE values since I could assign ANY value to X5 etc.?

On DS questions when plugging numbers, goal is to prove that the statement is not sufficient. So we should try to get an YES answer with one chosen number(s) and a NO with another.

You can easily see that (1) and (2) are not sufficient alone: different numbers plugged there will lead to different values of x1. When you take the statements together you are able to find the value of x4, and then the value of x1, so no need to plug-in there. _________________

Re: In the sequence of positive numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., what [#permalink]
06 Jul 2014, 08:51

Bunuel wrote:

In the sequence of positive numbers x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., what is the value of x_1?

(1) x_i=\frac{x_{(i-1)}}{2} for all integers i>1 --> we have the general formula connecting two consecutive terms (basically we have geometric progression with common ratio 1/2), but without the value of any term this info is insufficient to find x_1.

(2) x_5=\frac{x_4}{x_4+1} --> we have the relationship between x_5 and x_4, also insufficient to find x_1 (we cannot extrapolate the relationship between x_5 and x_4 to all consecutive terms in the sequence).

Re: In the sequence of positive numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., what [#permalink]
06 Jul 2014, 11:10

Expert's post

sagnik242 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

In the sequence of positive numbers x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., what is the value of x_1?

(1) x_i=\frac{x_{(i-1)}}{2} for all integers i>1 --> we have the general formula connecting two consecutive terms (basically we have geometric progression with common ratio 1/2), but without the value of any term this info is insufficient to find x_1.

(2) x_5=\frac{x_4}{x_4+1} --> we have the relationship between x_5 and x_4, also insufficient to find x_1 (we cannot extrapolate the relationship between x_5 and x_4 to all consecutive terms in the sequence).

Re: In the sequence of positive numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., what [#permalink]
06 Jul 2014, 19:39

Bunnuel,

Are AP and GP formulas and concepts required for GMAT? Its obvious that knowing them can be helpful like it helped here, but does GMAT need you to know these thoroughly?

gmatclubot

Re: In the sequence of positive numbers x1, x2, x3, ..., what
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2014, 19:39