In the United States, 43% of people wear a seat belt while : PS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 20:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the United States, 43% of people wear a seat belt while

Author Message
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 701
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 0

In the United States, 43% of people wear a seat belt while [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2008, 00:12
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:04) correct 50% (01:07) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

In the United States, 43% of people wear a seat belt while driving. If two people are chosen at random, what is the probability that both of them wear a seat belt?
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 790
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2008, 01:17
Hi
Think we should use binominal formula. Think the ans is (43/100)^2
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 629
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2008, 10:19
scthakur wrote:
Why not (43/100)*(42/99)?

that would've work if the population of the US consisted of 100 people. The assumption here is that the population is large enough and taking one person out will not change probabilities (independence of events).
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1569
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2008, 10:24
Thanks maratikus for clarification.
Re: PS: Probability-2   [#permalink] 28 Jun 2008, 10:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by