|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 113
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent [#permalink]
 08 Nov 2006, 21:31
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws was 645 crimes per 100,000 persons—about 50 percent higher than the average rate in the eleven states where strict gun-control laws have never been passed. Thus one way to reduce violent crime is to repeal strict gun control laws.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.
(B) In states with strict gun-control laws, few individuals are prosecuted for violating such laws.
(C) In states without strict gun-control laws, many individuals have had no formal training in the use of firearms.
(D) The annual rate of nonviolent crime is lower in states with strict gun-control laws than in states without such laws.
(E) Less than half of the individuals who reside in states without strict gun-control laws own a gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 718
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
Looks like E
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
The best answer could have been "strict gun-control laws were implemented in states which had high violent crime rate" 
A seems to be answer now. The argument says that the violent crime rate has come down since the laws were implemented. If the laws are repealed, then this might increase the crime rate in the states with strict gun-control laws.
E can't be the answer, because there is no information on what proportion of individuals own guns in states with strict gun-control laws.
_________________
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
A it eeeezz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 418
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Only A fits the bill
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2006
Posts: 162
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Why not B?
If few people are persecuted for crimes, then more of them will commit the crimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 0
|
A is best. It tells us the law actually works. The comparison could simply be poor since the other eleven states could have a massive population sample.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Clear A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
A it is.
_________________
Neelabh Mahesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 155
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
one more A
B says 'few', but this is not convincing. A few could be 100 over 10000 cases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
