Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 20:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3604
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 349

Kudos [?]: 1683 [0], given: 354

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 12:07
Expert's post
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:52) correct 50% (01:51) wrong based on 5 sessions
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws was 645 crimes per 100,000 persons: about 50 percent higher than the average rate in the eleven states where strict gun-control laws have never been passed. Thus one way to reduce violent crime is to repeal strict gun control laws.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.
(B) In states with strict gun-control laws, few individuals are prosecuted for violating such laws.
(C) In states without strict gun-control laws, many individuals have had no formal training in the use of firearms.
(D) The annual rate of nonviolent crime is lower in states with strict gun-control laws than in states without such laws.
(E) Less than half of the individuals who reside in states without strict gun-control laws own a gun.

Please, explain your answer

_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: gun-control laws [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 13:39
The conclusion is that gun laws had no effect in lowering violent crimes.
The premise is states with gun laws have higher rate of crime than state without gun laws.

So the assumption is that by imposing gun laws, these states would lower its violent crimes.

The answer that most weakens the argument is that gun laws have indeed lowered violent crimes, and those states with low rates of crime have always had low rates. Furthermore gun laws would benefit those 11 states as well.

So (A)
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2501
Followers: 51

Kudos [?]: 482 [0], given: 19

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: gun-control laws [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 13:40
walker wrote:
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws was 645 crimes per 100,000 persons: about 50 percent higher than the average rate in the eleven states where strict gun-control laws have never been passed. Thus one way to reduce violent crime is to repeal strict gun control laws.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.
(B) In states with strict gun-control laws, few individuals are prosecuted for violating such laws.
(C) In states without strict gun-control laws, many individuals have had no formal training in the use of firearms.
(D) The annual rate of nonviolent crime is lower in states with strict gun-control laws than in states without such laws.
(E) Less than half of the individuals who reside in states without strict gun-control laws own a gun.

Please, explain your answer


A. the law has been effective in lowing or controlling the crimes in those states that mplemented the law.

_________________

Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 478
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [1] , given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: gun-control laws [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 16:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
walker wrote:
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws was 645 crimes per 100,000 persons: about 50 percent higher than the average rate in the eleven states where strict gun-control laws have never been passed. Thus one way to reduce violent crime is to repeal strict gun control laws.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.
(B) In states with strict gun-control laws, few individuals are prosecuted for violating such laws.strengthens the argument. ELIMINATE.
(C) In states without strict gun-control laws, many individuals have had no formal training in the use of firearms. no relation of crime with formal training. ELIMINATE.
(D) The annual rate of nonviolent crime is lower in states with strict gun-control laws than in states without such laws. we are talking about violent crime, not non-violent crime.ELIMINATE.
(E) Less than half of the individuals who reside in states without strict gun-control laws own a gun. but then what is the number for states with strict gun laws? ELIMINATE

Think its A.
Please, explain your answer

_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1943
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR: gun-control laws [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 18:03
walker wrote:
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws was 645 crimes per 100,000 persons: about 50 percent higher than the average rate in the eleven states where strict gun-control laws have never been passed. Thus one way to reduce violent crime is to repeal strict gun control laws.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.
(B) In states with strict gun-control laws, few individuals are prosecuted for violating such laws.
(C) In states without strict gun-control laws, many individuals have had no formal training in the use of firearms.
(D) The annual rate of nonviolent crime is lower in states with strict gun-control laws than in states without such laws.
(E) Less than half of the individuals who reside in states without strict gun-control laws own a gun.

Please, explain your answer


A, too

The conclusion denies the role of the laws, so A confirms the role of the laws, A weakens the conclusion

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3604
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 349

Kudos [?]: 1683 [0], given: 354

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: CR: gun-control laws [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 20:59
Expert's post
OA is A

Thanks for explanation!
I had doubt about B.
vscid, +1

_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 49
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: gun-control laws [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2008, 00:41
My vote goes to A only.

Why?
B: No reason why prosecution would be deterrent.
C: formal training has nothing to do with people using guns.
D: Crime - violent or non-violent has nothing to do with gun-control.
E: Again the number of people are not really important.

Hence A. By elimination.

_________________

http://twitter.com/Saurabh

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 75

Re: In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2012, 23:14
(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.

The rate was even more before the law was in practice.

So, IMO too (A)

_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Re: In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent   [#permalink] 05 Jul 2012, 23:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent PUNEETSCHDV 2 14 Aug 2012, 23:16
The rate of violent crime in this state is up 30 percent crejoc 4 18 Aug 2009, 08:28
1 In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent atomy 9 22 May 2009, 05:13
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent girikorat 9 08 Nov 2006, 20:31
In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent damit 5 13 Jul 2005, 16:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.