Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 01:19
Customize  |  Hide

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 444
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 08:26
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 08:42
conclusion is that by using stringent seat belt standards, US will be able to lessen the severity of automobile accident

A. Severe accidents in US can be due to people at large not wearing seat belts so even if you improve the seat belts, passanger will still not wear it - Weakens

B: Severity of accident is reduced because of better training and not better seat belt as such - Weakens

C: Its the Car that is sturdy which bring down severity - Weakens

D: Statistics might be high because passangers dont have a better seat belt. ----> DOES NOT WEAKEN

E: In certain states where better seat belts were adopted did not see a reduction in severity - perhaps better seat belt is not the solution - Weakens


So D looks to be the correct answer to me.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 732
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 10:22
I ll go with E
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 10:52
I too think its (D) coz that in fact strenghthens the argument that americans are statistically more prone to accidents and thus require stringent seat belt laws.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Careful to watch for scope creep [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 11:15
I will also have to go with D. It doesn't matter how frequent the accidents are, it only matters how severe they are. The authors conclusion is that European seat belts will be better. Therefore, a, b, c, & e all weaken the argument, whereas d says nothing about the severity of accidents or the use of seatbelts.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 533
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 11:36
i tend to go with D...

although C and E are closer...
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 15:26
Straight D.

A,B and C are severly weakening the argument.
E is also saying that states where new standards are forced, don't show any improvements. Hence this is also weakening.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 444
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2006, 21:09
OA is (D).
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2006, 02:54
Late, but (D). The argument is focused on the severity of the accidents, not the likelihood of getting into one.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 330
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2006, 05:20
Late but D...
  [#permalink] 21 Aug 2006, 05:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in Vicky 6 29 Sep 2003, 03:46
Popular new posts In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in stoolfi 12 22 Jan 2004, 11:17
New posts In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in batliwala 6 07 Apr 2004, 07:44
New posts In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in remgeo 9 06 Apr 2006, 05:59
Popular new posts In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in sgrover 10 30 Jun 2006, 18:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.