In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 19:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Berkeley Haas 2013
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 38 [1] , given: 16

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2009, 18:30
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:35) correct 50% (03:57) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries
suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.

Please explain logic. Even though I found the logic on other board, I wanted to share this with GMATclub folks. Sorry if it was already posted here. I could not find it here.
Thank you
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 106
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 8

Re: In the US [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2009, 19:12
goldgoldandgold wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries
suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.

Please explain logic. Even though I found the logic on other board, I wanted to share this with GMATclub folks. Sorry if it was already posted here. I could not find it here.
Thank you

I thought of A or E as choice, however E looks more statistical. On the other hand, A directly nails down the argument saying US passenger are more unlikely to use safety belts which obsivously must be the reason for E.

So I go with A
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 357
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 32

Re: In the US [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2009, 23:20
I go with D.

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States - weakens
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers -weakens
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market -weakens
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe - strengthens
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents -weakens
Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

Re: In the US [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 00:52
IMO D is right
_________________

Regards,
Saaquib

If you find any grammatical mistake in my post please don't hesitate in pointing out.

Please +1 if you find this post useful.

My Blog

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 16

Re: In the US [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 02:48
I will go with D as well.
_________________

Never give up,,,

Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 53
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: In the US [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 03:01
Explain it plz
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 16

Re: In the US [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2009, 03:08
The text talks about necessity to have European type seat belts in the US, all the answer choices except D, say that Europeans suffer less
injuries in car accidents less than Americans not necessarily because of their specific seat belts but for some other answers, only answer D
saying that
Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe - strenghtens the argument saying that "we need to have European type seat belts because in America passengers have higher statistical chance of having accident"
_________________

Never give up,,,

Re: In the US   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2009, 03:08
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in 7 09 Dec 2010, 12:32
12 In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in 16 20 Jan 2010, 09:15
1 In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in 3 31 Jul 2008, 18:30
4 In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in 8 29 Jan 2008, 19:31
It is not correct that the people of the United States, 4 12 Mar 2007, 20:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.