Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 16:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the United States, landowners are effectively insured

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 189
GMAT Date: 11-18-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 23

In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 20:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (02:25) correct 26% (01:44) wrong based on 117 sessions
In the United States, landowners are effectively insured against natural disasters because the government subsidizes all land repairs by providing emergency relief after natural disasters. This “subsidy” is a partial cause for the high percentage of houses built on disaster-prone lands because it gives owners no financial incentive to research whether the land on which they build their houses is secure against disaster, argues an actuary. If owners were more selective, then potential house sites would need to be safe before being developed.

The actuary's argument makes which of the following assumptions?

A) Natural disasters are most costly when they strike large houses built close together.

B) A large percentage of landowners own several different lands across states.

C) The most careful site selection tends to be by owners building the more expensive houses.

D) The difference in the relief amounts paid to owners by different states has no major effect on site selection.

E) Potential builders can know which lands are secure against disaster.



I does not understand argument of these sentence
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thriving for CHANGE

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Fighting again to Kill the GMAT devil
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 137
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: Oil and Gas - Engineering & Construction
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 48

Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 22:11
Aristocrat wrote:
In the United States, landowners are effectively insured against natural disasters because the government subsidizes all land repairs by providing emergency relief after natural disasters. This “subsidy” is a partial cause for the high percentage of houses built on disaster-prone lands because it gives owners no financial incentive to research whether the land on which they build their houses is secure against disaster, argues an actuary. If owners were more selective, then potential house sites would need to be safe before being developed.

The actuary's argument makes which of the following assumptions?

A) Natural disasters are most costly when they strike large houses built close together.

B) A large percentage of landowners own several different lands across states.

C) The most careful site selection tends to be by owners building the more expensive houses.

D) The difference in the relief amounts paid to owners by different states has no major effect on site selection.

E) Potential builders can know which lands are secure against disaster.



I does not understand argument of these sentence



Argument states that the government insures land against any natural disaster, so land owners don't take sufficient pains to build their homes on areas which are disaster free. and land owners do it because they know that if some disaster happens then government will pay for the insured land.

The author concludes that land owners thus do not take pains to research whether the land which they have bought is disaster prone or not?

This argument assumes that Landowners have sufficient understanding to know what kind of land is disaster prone and what is not.

Hence answer is E.
_________________

Giving Kudos, is a great Way to Help the GC Community Kudos

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2794
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 182

Kudos [?]: 986 [0], given: 235

Reviews Badge
Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 22:36
I think the answer should be D. If you negate it, the conclusion is weakend.

How can E be true? the potential builders are not same as landowners.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 22:38
Primises 1 : The house owners are insured INDIRECTLY , How ? because after disaster govt give money.
Primises 2 : The govt help is responsible for lot of house in disaster area as it not give any incentive b4 , so that owner can determine which area is safe.

So the answer Clearly E, it assumes people can know which area are safe b4 they build . :idea:

1 Kudo If u Like :wink:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2794
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 182

Kudos [?]: 986 [0], given: 235

Reviews Badge
Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 22:41
tapsgmat wrote:
Primises 1 : The house owners are insured INDIRECTLY , How ? because after disaster govt give money.
Primises 2 : The govt help is responsible for lot of house in disaster area as it not give any incentive b4 , so that owner can determine which area is safe.

So the answer Clearly E, it assumes people can know which area are safe b4 they build . :idea:

1 Kudo If u Like :wink:


How can E be true? the potential builders are not same as landowners.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 75

Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 22:43
got it right at 2:36 mins :(

In the United States, landowners are effectively insured against natural disasters because the government subsidizes all land repairs by providing emergency relief after natural disasters. This “subsidy” is a partial cause for the high percentage of houses built on disaster-prone lands because it gives owners no financial incentive to research whether the land on which they build their houses is secure against disaster, argues an actuary. If owners were more selective, then potential house sites would need to be safe before being developed.

Meaning
If the Govt. give some benefit to the landowners then the landowners will do some study to find the best lands and construct safer houses.

The actuary's argument makes which of the following assumptions?

A) Natural disasters are most costly when they strike large houses built close together.

B) A large percentage of landowners own several different lands across states.

C) The most careful site selection tends to be by owners building the more expensive houses.

D) The difference in the relief amounts paid to owners by different states has no major effect on site selection.

E) Potential builders can know which lands are secure against disaster.
The landowners will select the best lands and develop , so probability of disaster will be lesser ( and even if any disaster comes , they will be paid subsidy over the repair.)
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 189
GMAT Date: 11-18-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 23

Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2012, 00:27
Even i have chosen answer as 'D'
Thanks guys for explanation :-D
_________________

Thriving for CHANGE

Re: In the United States, landowners are effectively insured   [#permalink] 15 Aug 2012, 00:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Medicare, the United States government's health insurance eybrj2 5 08 May 2012, 08:21
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Medicare, the United States governments health insurance rohansherry 15 15 Aug 2009, 09:59
3 United states blog 13 23 Jan 2008, 21:56
Medicare, the United States governments health insurance singh_amit19 5 29 Sep 2007, 21:38
It is not correct that the people of the United States, saurya_s 6 04 Mar 2005, 07:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States, landowners are effectively insured

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.