Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 May 2015, 00:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the United States, of the people who moved from one state

Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 236
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 113 [2] , given: 21

In the United States, of the people who moved from one state [#permalink]  09 Oct 2010, 02:03
2
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:13) correct 37% (07:50) wrong based on 197 sessions
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage
who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local
businesses in Florida cater to retirees, these declines are likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect
on these businesses and therefore on the economy of Florida.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given?
(A) People who moved from one state to another when they retired moved a greater distance, on average,
last year than such people did ten years ago.
(B) People were more likely to retire to North Carolina from another state last year than people were
ten years ago.
(C) The number of people who moved from one state to another when they retired has increased signifi cantly
over the past ten years.
(D) The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than
it was ten years ago.
(E) Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other
state.

OA will be given tomorrow.

If you like the question Consider KUDOS.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by ankitranjan on 10 Oct 2010, 02:35, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 408
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 50

Re: CR3 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2010, 03:02
I vote for option C. Even though there is a drop of 3% points, if the overall population of retired people moving into Florida increases then the increase would more than offset the 3% point decrease.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 477
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 9

Re: CR3 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2010, 09:56
Refer

cr-retired-people-13239.html

Please search the forum before posting
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 3

Re: CR3 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2010, 10:38
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR3 [#permalink]  09 Nov 2010, 02:43
I hardly find any answer choice correct. I don't agree with C because the C refers to the increase in the retirees who move from one state to another in general. It doesn't specifically refer to Florida. I think it's a big assumption to apply that fact to Florida.
That left me with option E.
Senior Manager
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 252
Location: Chennai, India
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 30

Re: CR3 [#permalink]  15 Nov 2010, 05:58
Though stinks it has to be C, others are no close
_________________

Gonna make it this time

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 5559
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1374

Kudos [?]: 6994 [1] , given: 179

Re: CR3 [#permalink]  15 Nov 2010, 12:16
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Actually, C doesn't stink.
Consider the stimulus again:
"Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years."

So ten years back, let's say, 100 people moved from one to another state. Let's also assume 30 of those 100 moved to Florida. In US, 30% of people who were moving after retirement, moved to Florida.

It has gone down to 27%.

What option C says is: "The number of people who moved from one state to another when they retired has increased significantly
over the past ten years"

The total number of people who are moving has increased significantly.
So now, perhaps 200 people move from one state to another as compared to 100 of ten years back. Then 27% would be 54, still much greater than 30.
So there may not have been any negative effect, in fact there might have been a positive effect because more people are moving to Florida. Therefore, it weakens the conclusion.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Manager Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 212 Schools: ISB, HEC, Said Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 28 Re: CR3 [#permalink] 17 Nov 2010, 03:45 This is OG 12 question and answer indeed is C. Senior Manager Status: swimming against the current Joined: 24 Jul 2009 Posts: 252 Location: Chennai, India Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 30 Re: CR3 [#permalink] 17 Nov 2010, 05:41 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Actually, C doesn't stink. Consider the stimulus again: "Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years." So ten years back, let's say, 100 people moved from one to another state. Let's also assume 30 of those 100 moved to Florida. In US, 30% of people who were moving after retirement, moved to Florida. It has gone down to 27%. What option C says is: "The number of people who moved from one state to another when they retired has increased significantly over the past ten years" The total number of people who are moving has increased significantly. So now, perhaps 200 people move from one state to another as compared to 100 of ten years back. Then 27% would be 54, still much greater than 30. So there may not have been any negative effect, in fact there might have been a positive effect because more people are moving to Florida. Therefore, it weakens the conclusion. The stimulus states "these declines are likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses and therefore on the economy of Florida." let the number move a higher than the last year, but considerably it is a number less than would have actually moved so there could still be a negative effect. _________________ Gonna make it this time Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 5559 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1374 Kudos [?]: 6994 [0], given: 179 Re: CR3 [#permalink] 17 Nov 2010, 07:15 Expert's post mailnavin1 wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Actually, C doesn't stink. Consider the stimulus again: "Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years." So ten years back, let's say, 100 people moved from one to another state. Let's also assume 30 of those 100 moved to Florida. In US, 30% of people who were moving after retirement, moved to Florida. It has gone down to 27%. What option C says is: "The number of people who moved from one state to another when they retired has increased significantly over the past ten years" The total number of people who are moving has increased significantly. So now, perhaps 200 people move from one state to another as compared to 100 of ten years back. Then 27% would be 54, still much greater than 30. So there may not have been any negative effect, in fact there might have been a positive effect because more people are moving to Florida. Therefore, it weakens the conclusion. The stimulus states "these declines are likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses and therefore on the economy of Florida." let the number move a higher than the last year, but considerably it is a number less than would have actually moved so there could still be a negative effect. Absolutely mailnavin1, there could still be a negative effect. Since (C) says 'increased significantly'. But we do not know by how much. But the question is "which of the following weakens the argument?", not "which of the following make it false?".. Since option (C) creates a possibility that the argument might become invalid, it weakens the argument considerably. I hope it makes more sense now. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Status: One more shot
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 2
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 7

In the United States, of the people who moved from one state [#permalink]  20 May 2015, 22:01
C &E are the best choices.
E is abmiguous with the statement more which is quite relative.
Hence C looks good.
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state   [#permalink] 20 May 2015, 22:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the united states, of the people who moved from one state 0 05 May 2012, 19:02
1 In the United States, of the people who moved from one state 2 14 Dec 2011, 11:16
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state 16 01 Nov 2006, 08:21
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state 6 28 Aug 2006, 03:04
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state 5 06 Aug 2005, 05:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by