Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 04:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the United States, of the people who moved from one state

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

In the United States, of the people who moved from one state [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 10:17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

63% (01:51) correct 38% (01:10) wrong based on 8 sessions
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeable negative economic effect on these businesses.
Which of the follow, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B. The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.
C. There are more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
D. The total number of people who retired and move to another state fro their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.
E. The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago.


I don't agree with the OA, so I would like to understand ...
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Florida Retirees [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 10:19
I get C as the asnwer...no tsure why it would be D...its clear that what weakens the argument would be a reason that the economy would not be negatively impacted due to a decline of retirees moving to Florida.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2011
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 16

Re: Florida Retirees [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 10:29
IMO it has to be D.
Here is how -
The narrative talks about the point percentage decrease in the retirees. Hence any option that speaks specifically of the 'actual number' of retirees going up will weaken the conclusion since it will attack the premise ( number of retirees impacting the flourishing of local businesses in this case).
Lets look at the options:
A) Florida still attaracts more number of retirees that come here for settlement, however still the percentage is down as per the narrative. This does not give a clear indication whether the actual number of retirees has gone done or up. Maybe, the number of people retiring has decreased..does not weaken significantly
B) No impact - irrelevant
c) No impact as it does not talk about the businesses in question
D) Correct choice - The Number of retirees has significanly increased. Still the percentage is down by only 3 points. Implying even though retirees are moving to other states, the actual number of retirees coming to florida has increased. Weakens the conclusion hence the argument.
E) No impact.
_________________

Time to play the game...

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2011
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 16

Re: Florida Retirees [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 10:35
I had a tough choice between A and D... C talks about businesses that cater to tourists and not specifically to the retirees which makes it non impacting to the conclusion on the narrative.
_________________

Time to play the game...

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Florida Retirees [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 10:41
I still don't understand why C has no impact/no relation to the conclusion. The conclusion, to me, is that because businesses cater to retirees and the % of retirees going to Florida has decreased, there will be a negative impact on the economy. However, if they cater to tourists more than retirees, it shouldnt impact becuase it says nothing about less tourists...D is still not making sense to me..


In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeable negative economic effect on these businesses.
Which of the follow, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2011
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [1] , given: 16

Re: Florida Retirees [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 11:35
1
This post received
KUDOS
The conclusion is "Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeable negative economic effect on these businesses."
The key word here is "these". The conclusion only talks about the negative impact on the businesses which cater to retirees and not about the economic impact on the economy as a whole.
D makes sense because it specifically talks about the actual number of retirees increasing and hence negates the premise of the percentage going down.
For eg.
10 years ago - Number of retirees = 100
% moving to florida - 53
Actual number moving to florida - 53

Today
Number of retirees - 1000 (significantly higher)
percentage moving to florida - 50
Actual number moving to florida - 500

Hence the actual number has gone up 10 times.
Hope this helps.
_________________

Time to play the game...

Re: Florida Retirees   [#permalink] 13 Jan 2012, 11:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state solidcolor 3 31 Aug 2007, 22:30
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state KC 16 01 Nov 2006, 08:21
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state vivek123 5 06 Aug 2005, 05:32
1 In the United States, of the people who moved from one state jma123 13 22 Feb 2005, 18:18
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic In the United States, of the people who moved from one state DLMD 9 16 Jan 2005, 15:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States, of the people who moved from one state

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.