Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jul 2014, 02:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the vast majority of cases, when people are stopped by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2010, 13:37
JoshKnewton wrote:
Thanks for the discussion everyone.

Your confusion is understandable since the question was actually copied incorrectly!

In our materials, answer choice A reads "(A) Airport metal detectors, when set to LOWER levels of sensitivity..."

And then the answer is clearly A (though C does remain a strong second-best option). Here's the whole explanation.

--
We are given a situation in which airport metal detectors are said to be too sensitive, forcing innocent passengers carrying coins to be stopped. The argument states that innocent passengers would be stopped less often (because the small bits of harmless metal they are carrying would not set off detectors) with no loss of security (because weapons are not always metal, and if they are, use a larger amount of metal than a coin) if the detectors were programmed to be less sensitive. The correct answer will be additional evidence that supports the first claim without undermining the second.

Choice A: This choice is correct. This choice bolsters the claim that passengers, presumably innocent, with small bits of metal that are not weapons (watches, belts or jean rivets) will not be stopped unnecessarily. Although this choice adds nothing to the claim that security will retain its ability to screen for weapons, it does not undermine it either.

Choice B: The cost of the proposed plan is not at issue. The desired effect of the plan is to retain security and reduce innocent passenger stops, and this choice does not effect either of those issues.

Choice C: This is a very tempting answer choice, because it is a positive aspect of low-sensitivity metal detectors, but this choice does not, in fact, directly address the claim that fewer innocent people will be stopped by the low-sensitivity detectors. This choice only applies to people already carrying weapons, who are not, by definition, innocent.

Choice D: This choice undermines the claim. If passengers who are stopped for having small amounts of metal are carrying weapons, then reducing security's ability to stop them would hamper the ability to screen for weapons.

Choice E: This choice also undermines the proposal. If only small pieces of metal are used in weapons, then a metal detector must be able to detect small pieces of metal to detect weapons.


But the conclusion has 2 points:
- Reduce the frequency with which innocent passengers are stopped.
- Not to hamper security’s ability to screen for weapons.

A addresses the first point, but not the second one; and C vice versa.

So, how you can say that A is better than C?
Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Knewton GMAT Discount CodesKaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 443
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 112

Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2010, 21:20
c....but now A ....not after correction but after reading the explantion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 98
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2010, 22:04
no wonder it doesn't make sense.
Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors   [#permalink] 30 Jul 2010, 22:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic In recent decades, the vast majority of construction soaringAlone 10 10 Jul 2012, 10:46
1 the vast majority = plural or singular? sk88 6 23 Aug 2009, 16:20
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false singh_amit19 9 17 Oct 2007, 11:57
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false withme 14 23 Sep 2006, 23:36
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false jerrywu 8 12 Sep 2006, 05:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the vast majority of cases, when people are stopped by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.