Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Substituting (r,s) in the original equation: y=3x+2 => s=3r+2 => 3r-s+2=0. Question : is 3r-s-2=0. ?? statement 1 - (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0 => (3r+2-s)=0 or (4r+9-s)=0 Not sufficient

Statement 2 - (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0 => (3r+2-s)=0 or (4r-6-s)=0 Not sufficient Combining 1&2 -> common result (3r+2-s)=0 Sufficient. Answer - C

Re: Coordinate geometry - gmatprep [#permalink]
10 Jan 2012, 07:17

2

This post received KUDOS

Ok.. So lets look at both the statements individually:

First Statement 1:

1. (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0

Look at the statement. It could mean two things. Either (3r+2-s) = 0 or (4r+9-s) = 0

if (3r+2-s) = 0, then yes 3r+2-s = 0 and hence s=3r+2 which is exactly like saying y=3x+2

But if 3r+2-s is not equal to 0 then we don't know for sure.

Now lets look at statement 2:

2. (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

Same implies for statement 2.

now lets assume that in the first statement 4r+9-s=0. If that is true, then from the second statement it is not possible for 4r-6-s to be equal to 0. Hence 3r+2-s = 0 and yes the point r,s which is the same as x,y lies on it !

Hence C _________________

"Nowadays, people know the price of everything, and the value of nothing."Oscar Wilde

Re: Coordinate geometry - gmatprep [#permalink]
10 Jan 2012, 12:06

Easy one. GMAT loves these type of patterns.

NOTE: Notice the pattern here. When you have similar type of information in both statements, the answer is usually C, D or E.

1. rephrasing the equations gives us s=3r+2 and s=4r+9. obviously s=4r+9 does not lie, but s=3r+2 does 2. rephrasing the equations gives us s=3r+2 and s=4r-5. obviously s=4r-5 does not lie, but s=3r+2 does

Together, s=3r+2 and it does lie. C. _________________

I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul. Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved!

DS - If negative answer only, still sufficient. No need to find exact solution. PS - Always look at the answers first CR - Read the question stem first, hunt for conclusion SC - Meaning first, Grammar second RC - Mentally connect paragraphs as you proceed. Short = 2min, Long = 3-4 min

In the XY plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?

Line with equation y=3x+2 contains the point (r,s) means that when substituting r ans s in line equation: s=3r+2 (or 3r+2-s=0) holds true.

So basically we are asked to determine whether 3r+2-s=0 is true or not.

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0 --> either 3r+2-s=0 OR 4r+9-s=0 OR both. Not sufficient.

(2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0 --> either 3r+2-s=0 OR 4r-6-s=0 OR both. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both 4r+9-s=0 and 4r-6-s=0 can not be true (simultaneously), as 4r-s can not equal to both -9 and 6, hence 3r+2-s=0 must be true. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunuel,

Again, sorry for re-opening an old thread but I have a small doubt regarding this question. I got this question on my GMAT Prep today, had one quick look at the options and immediately saw that for the point to lie on the line, 3r+2-s has to be equal to zero. And since this information was given to us in two separate quadratic equations, it was necessary for us to have both the equations in order to discard (4r+9-s) and (4r-6-s) as solutions to the given equations.

However, at this point, I thought to myself that C would be too easy an answer and solved the equations to see if GMAT was upto its usual trickery. And this is where I went wrong.

Take for example the first equation. One solution gives us what we want, i.e., 3r+2-s = 0. However, if we solve the second solution 4r+9-s = 0, we get s = 4r+9. Now, if we plug this into the original equation y = 3x+2, we get:

y = 3x+2 Plugging the values of r and s into x and y:

4r+9 = 3r +2; Solving this gives us r = -7 and s = -19 and plugging these values of r and s in the original equation satisfies the equation:

-19 = 3(-7) + 2; -19 = -19

Since, this equation too satisfies the equation (and similarly, so does the second equation) I marked the answer as D.

In the XY plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?

Line with equation y=3x+2 contains the point (r,s) means that when substituting r ans s in line equation: s=3r+2 (or 3r+2-s=0) holds true.

So basically we are asked to determine whether 3r+2-s=0 is true or not.

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0 --> either 3r+2-s=0 OR 4r+9-s=0 OR both. Not sufficient.

(2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0 --> either 3r+2-s=0 OR 4r-6-s=0 OR both. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both 4r+9-s=0 and 4r-6-s=0 can not be true (simultaneously), as 4r-s can not equal to both -9 and 6, hence 3r+2-s=0 must be true. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunuel,

Again, sorry for re-opening an old thread but I have a small doubt regarding this question. I got this question on my GMAT Prep today, had one quick look at the options and immediately saw that for the point to lie on the line, 3r+2-s has to be equal to zero. And since this information was given to us in two separate quadratic equations, it was necessary for us to have both the equations in order to discard (4r+9-s) and (4r-6-s) as solutions to the given equations.

However, at this point, I thought to myself that C would be too easy an answer and solved the equations to see if GMAT was upto its usual trickery. And this is where I went wrong.

Take for example the first equation. One solution gives us what we want, i.e., 3r+2-s = 0. However, if we solve the second solution 4r+9-s = 0, we get s = 4r+9. Now, if we plug this into the original equation y = 3x+2, we get:

y = 3x+2 Plugging the values of r and s into x and y:

4r+9 = 3r +2; Solving this gives us r = -7 and s = -19 and plugging these values of r and s in the original equation satisfies the equation:

-19 = 3(-7) + 2; -19 = -19

Since, this equation too satisfies the equation (and similarly, so does the second equation) I marked the answer as D.

Can you please tell me where I am going wrong?

Many thanks in advance.

The question asks whether 3r+2-s=0. Now, statement (1) says: (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0, which means that either 3r+2-s=0OR4r+9-s=0OR both.

The above DOES NOT mean that we have a system of equations: 3r+2-s=0 and 4r+9-s=0. Because if it were so then you have an answer right away: 3r+2-s=0. No wonder that when you solve it as a system you got the values of s and r which make 3r+2-s equal to zero: your whole starting point was that it does.

Re: In the xy-plane, does the line with equation y = 3x + 2 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2012, 04:09

Bunuel wrote:

Stiv wrote:

In the xy-plane, does the line with equation y = 3x + 2 contain the point (r,s)? 1) (3r + 2 - s) (4r + 9 - s) = 0 2) (4r - 6 - s) (3r + 2 - s) = 0

Merging similar topics. Please ask if anything remains unclear.

I don't understand why, but when I search for this question in the search query I get no results. Also, this is not the only case. This happens quite often. _________________

Re: In the xy-plane, does the line with equation y = 3x + 2 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2012, 04:12

Expert's post

Stiv wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Stiv wrote:

In the xy-plane, does the line with equation y = 3x + 2 contain the point (r,s)? 1) (3r + 2 - s) (4r + 9 - s) = 0 2) (4r - 6 - s) (3r + 2 - s) = 0

Merging similar topics. Please ask if anything remains unclear.

I don't understand why, but when I search for this question in the search query I get no results. Also, this is not the only case. This happens quite often.

Try to search using key words of the question. For example I'd search for: "equation", "contain", and "point". Though it's not a big problem if you search and don't find a question, moderators will help you with that. So, don't worry about that. _________________

Re: In the XY plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 [#permalink]
08 Jul 2013, 02:59

1

This post received KUDOS

gaurav2k101 wrote:

In the xy-plane , does the line with equation y=3x+2 contains the point(r,s)?

(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0 (2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

A*B=0==>THEN EITHER A/B IS ZERO OR BOTH ARE ZERO...this is a rule. now if r,s lies on point y=3x+2==>then 3r+2-s=0 now lets say 3r+2-s=A.. 4r+9-s=B 4r-6-s=C

now statement 1 SAYS that ...A*B=0===>Clearly we are not sure that A=0 or not similarly statement 2 says that ...A*C===>AGAIN WE CANNOT GAURANTEE THAT A=0..

NOW combining both we cam clearly say that A=0.. HENCE SUFFICIENT. _________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

Re: In the XY plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 [#permalink]
30 Aug 2013, 14:41

Bunuel,

In statement (1), you have said that we have these possibilities: (3r + 2 - s) = 0 OR (4r + 9 - s) = 0 OR both.

But, when we have something like this: (x + 3)(x+5) = 0

In this case, there are only two possibilities, right? (x+3)=0 OR (x+5)=0. Both cannot be zero at the same time because "x" represents a single and unique value. Please confirm.

gmatclubot

Re: In the XY plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2
[#permalink]
30 Aug 2013, 14:41

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...