Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Jul 2014, 11:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the years since the city of London imposed strict

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
In the years since the city of London imposed strict [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 07:09
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

56% (02:11) correct 44% (01:56) wrong based on 9 sessions
In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 364
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 07:21
it's not c, d, e

so either A or B.

A says entirely which seems to be an exaggeration.
but B is about the quality of air.

I would guess B.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 07:42
why not E?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 09:02
A should be the answer
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 09:12
E

How can E be an assumption?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 09:49
riteshgupta1 wrote:
why not E?


Here's why E is an assupmtion of the argument. We're looking for a statement that is not an assumption in this question.

(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
- This statement is nescessary to support the argument that air pollution regulations are effective

(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
- THis statement is needed to support the plan to implement the same regulations in other parts of the world

(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
- This statement is needed to support that the air pollution measures put in place to increase the number of bird species is desirable

(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
- This statement is needed to support the author's comment that the number of species has increased

In fact, A is the only one that does not have any real use to the argument.

(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
- With this statement, nothing in the argument is supported for.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 10:14
E it is.

GA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 11:33
IMO E it is....
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 315
Location: Los Angeles
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 11:45
I think the answer should be A because it nullifies the argument.

What is the OA?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 15:42
I think its E.

A has to be an assumption since it is saying the rise of bird species is related to less pollution, which in turn is related to control of regulated pollution output from local industries. If OTHER industries were causing pollution too, then the birds probably would not have been sighted(since it dosn't mention anything about reducing pollution for OTHER industries), hence A stands.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2005, 21:12
E it is.

Birds increased due to reduced pollution. If this is the underlying assumption, then A is one of the assumptions becasue if there are other industries and they are still polluting, then the birds would not have icreased!
Pollution is pollution whether they are from local industries or other industries.

Good one! Where are these CRs from by the way? Any specific collection? OG CR is just average! Any other good source to practice guys?
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2005, 00:03
OA is A.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2005, 00:04
We're looking for a statement that is not an assumption needed for the argument to stand. A is the only one that has no real use around here.
  [#permalink] 03 Sep 2005, 00:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 In the years since the city of London imposed strict rlevochkin 13 18 Mar 2010, 21:26
1 In the years since the city of London imposed strict sidbidus 21 15 May 2007, 04:22
In the years since the city of London imposed strict quangviet512 13 05 Sep 2006, 21:07
In the years since the city of London imposed strict sperinko 7 05 Aug 2006, 16:14
In the years since the city of London imposed strict nakib77 5 21 Sep 2005, 09:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the years since the city of London imposed strict

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.