In the years since the city of London imposed strict : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 02:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the years since the city of London imposed strict

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 131
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

In the years since the city of London imposed strict [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 11:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 254
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 13:42
This is a hard one. I'll go with A. It seems the most out of scope. I don't like the strong language of "most" and "entirely."

What's the OA?
Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 14:13
i Think its E .

The argument doesnt talk abt the actual increase in the species .
It just talks abt the more sightings of birds near the city.

~sara
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 254
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 14:55
saransh wrote:
i Think its E .

The argument doesnt talk abt the actual increase in the species .
It just talks abt the more sightings of birds near the city.

~sara

The passages does specifically mention species. Though ambiguious, if it were in fact only talking about the number of species discovered, then it wouldn't make sense that that is linked to pollution decrease.
Director
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 545
Schools: MIT Sloan
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 16:04
I am thinking B .. whats the OA ?
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 170
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 16:36
gotta agree with my friday the 13th buddy baer here.

I'll go with A, its out of scope to say that the passage assumes that air pollution problems are caused ENTIRELY by local industry.

I was actually split between A and B, but I think A is the more foolproof answer.
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 16:44
I initially thought D but A looks the best
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 874
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2007, 22:37
The answer is A...discussed many times on this forum.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2007, 00:49
Why not D, as most of the major cities are polluted predominantly by local industry, the "Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities" will have an effect on the pollution, what am I missing?
27 Jun 2007, 00:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the years since the city of London imposed strict 15 05 Jul 2008, 14:36
In the years since the city of London imposed strict 11 19 Mar 2008, 16:27
In the years since the city of London imposed strict 3 05 Jul 2007, 10:23
2 In the years since the city of London imposed strict 22 15 May 2007, 04:22
In the years since the city of London imposed strict 8 14 Mar 2007, 21:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by