Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 06:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
GMAT Date: 09-17-2012
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 126 [1] , given: 26

Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 01:30
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (02:06) correct 34% (01:19) wrong based on 243 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that links high voltage electric wire with cancer among children, legislation banning high voltage transmission lines near school districts cannot be implemented on health hazard grounds.

Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

A) It ignores causes of cancer other than high voltage transmission lines.
B) It neglects the damaging effects that high voltage transmission lines might have on groups of people other than children.
C) High voltage transmission lines interfere with other radio devices such as antennas, satellites and cellphones.
D) Most children would prefer to live in areas that are away from high voltage transmission lines.
E) Legislation banning high voltage transmission lines around school districts is easy to enforce.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Re: Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 02:04
Argument : Industrialists say that high voltage transmission lines ban on the basis of health hazards should not be done.

A) It ignores causes of cancer other than high voltage transmission lines. - causes of cancer is not the argument.
B) It neglects the damaging effects that high voltage transmission lines might have on groups of people other than children. Criticizes the argument. Correct.
C) High voltage transmission lines interfere with other radio devices such as antennas, satellites and cellphones. radio devices doesnt impact the argument.
D) Most children would prefer to live in areas that are away from high voltage transmission lines. This doesnt criticise the argument.
E) Legislation banning high voltage transmission lines around school districts is easy to enforce. Doesnt correlate with the argument.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 912
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 603 [0], given: 44

Re: Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 07:19
ananthpatri wrote:
Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that links high voltage electric wire with cancer among children, legislation banning high voltage transmission lines near school districts cannot be implemented on health hazard grounds.

Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

A) It ignores causes of cancer other than high voltage transmission lines.
B) It neglects the damaging effects that high voltage transmission lines might have on groups of people other than children.
C) High voltage transmission lines interfere with other radio devices such as antennas, satellites and cellphones.
D) Most children would prefer to live in areas that are away from high voltage transmission lines.
E) Legislation banning high voltage transmission lines around school districts is easy to enforce.

Choice B is the correct answer, uncovering the assumption of the author "High voltage only causes the hazard damage to only children".
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 291

Re: Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2013, 20:37
700!!! Seriously... I hope I get this "700" level question on my xam as well.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10542
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2016, 18:22
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Industrialists argue that because there is no evidence that   [#permalink] 17 Sep 2016, 18:22
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical 8 18 Feb 2011, 05:54
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical 6 11 Sep 2008, 12:01
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical 4 12 Aug 2008, 06:56
The Pharmaceutical industry argues that because new drugs 6 29 Aug 2007, 19:01
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical 1 01 Jul 2007, 17:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by