Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 07 Jul 2015, 07:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Inequalities trick

Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2800
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 196

Kudos [?]: 1162 [56] , given: 235

Inequalities trick [#permalink]  16 Mar 2010, 09:11
56
KUDOS
117
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I learnt this trick while I was in school and yesterday while solving one question I recalled.
Its good if you guys use it 1-2 times to get used to it.

Suppose you have the inequality

f(x) = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d) < 0

Just arrange them in order as shown in the picture and draw curve starting from + from right.

now if f(x) < 0 consider curve having "-" inside and if f(x) > 0 consider curve having "+" and combined solution will be the final solution. I m sure I have recalled it fully but if you guys find any issue on that do let me know, this is very helpful.

Don't forget to arrange then in ascending order from left to right. a<b<c<d

So for f(x) < 0 consider "-" curves and the ans is : (a < x < b) , (c < x < d)
and for f(x) > 0 consider "+" curves and the ans is : (x < a), (b < x < c) , (d < x)

If f(x) has three factors then the graph will have - + - +
If f(x) has four factors then the graph will have + - + - +

If you can not figure out how and why, just remember it.
Try to analyze that the function will have number of roots = number of factors and every time the graph will touch the x axis.

For the highest factor d if x>d then the whole f(x) > 0 and after every interval of the roots the signs will change alternatively.
Attachments

1.jpg [ 6.73 KiB | Viewed 29844 times ]

_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 5682
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1415

Kudos [?]: 7357 [43] , given: 186

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  22 Oct 2010, 05:33
43
KUDOS
Expert's post
39
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Yes, this is a neat little way to work with inequalities where factors are multiplied or divided. And, it has a solid reasoning behind it which I will just explain.

If (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d) < 0, we can draw the points a, b, c and d on the number line.
e.g. Given (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)(x-4) < 0, draw the points -2, 1, 7 and 4 on the number line as shown.

Attachment:

doc.jpg [ 7.9 KiB | Viewed 29149 times ]

This divides the number line into 5 regions. Values of x in right most region will always give you positive value of the expression. The reason for this is that if x > 7, all factors above will be positive.

When you jump to the next region between x = 4 and x = 7, value of x here give you negative value for the entire expression because now, (x - 7) will be negative since x < 7 in this region. All other factors are still positive.

When you jump to the next region on the left between x = 1 and x = 4, expression will be positive again because now two factors (x - 7) and (x - 4) are negative, but negative x negative is positive... and so on till you reach the leftmost section.

Since we are looking for values of x where the expression is < 0, here the solution will be -2 < x < 1 or 4< x < 7

It should be obvious that it will also work in cases where factors are divided.
e.g. (x - a)(x - b)/(x - c)(x - d) < 0
(x + 2)(x - 1)/(x -4)(x - 7) < 0 will have exactly the same solution as above.

Note: If, rather than < or > sign, you have <= or >=, in division, the solution will differ slightly. I will leave it for you to figure out why and how. Feel free to get back to me if you want to confirm your conclusion.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Math Forum Moderator Joined: 20 Dec 2010 Posts: 2028 Followers: 138 Kudos [?]: 1165 [15] , given: 376 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 11 Mar 2011, 05:49 15 This post received KUDOS 6 This post was BOOKMARKED vjsharma25 wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: vjsharma25 wrote: How you have decided on the first sign of the graph?Why it is -ve if it has three factors and +ve when four factors? Check out my post above for explanation. I understand the concept but not the starting point of the graph.How you decide about the graph to be a sine or cosine waveform?Meaning graph starts from the +ve Y-axis for four values and starts from -ve Y-axis for three values. What if the equation you mentioned is (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)<0,will the last two ranges be excluded or the graph will also change? I always struggle with this as well!!! There is a trick Bunuel suggested; (x+2)(x-1)(x-7) < 0 Here the roots are; -2,1,7 Arrange them in ascending order; -2,1,7; These are three points where the wave will alternate. The ranges are; x<-2 -2<x<1 1<x<7 x>7 Take a big value of x; say 1000; you see the inequality will be positive for that. (1000+2)(1000-1)(1000-7) is +ve. Thus the last range(x>7) is on the positive side. Graph is +ve after 7. Between 1 and 7-> -ve between -2 and 1-> +ve Before -2 -> -ve Since the inequality has the less than sign; consider only the -ve side of the graph; 1<x<7 or x<-2 is the complete range of x that satisfies the inequality. _________________ Manager Joined: 29 Sep 2008 Posts: 150 Followers: 3 Kudos [?]: 49 [11] , given: 1 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 22 Oct 2010, 10:45 11 This post received KUDOS 6 This post was BOOKMARKED if = sign is included with < then <= will be there in solution like for (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)(x-4) <=0 the solution will be -2 <= x <= 1 or 4<= x <= 7 in case when factors are divided then the numerator will contain = sign like for (x + 2)(x - 1)/(x -4)(x - 7) < =0 the solution will be -2 <= x <= 1 or 4< x < 7 we cant make 4<=x<=7 as it will make the solution infinite correct me if i am wrong Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 5682 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1415 Kudos [?]: 7357 [6] , given: 186 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 11 Mar 2011, 18:57 6 This post received KUDOS Expert's post vjsharma25 wrote: I understand the concept but not the starting point of the graph.How you decide about the graph to be a sine or cosine waveform?Meaning graph starts from the +ve Y-axis for four values and starts from -ve Y-axis for three values. What if the equation you mentioned is (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)<0,will the last two ranges be excluded or the graph will also change? Ok, look at this expression inequality: (x+2)(x-1)(x-7) < 0 Can I say the left hand side expression will always be positive for values greater than 7? (x+2) will be positive, (x - 1) will be positive and (x-7) will also be positive... so in the rightmost regions i.e. x > 7, all three factors will be positive. The expression will be positive when x > 7, it will be negative when 1 < x < 7, positive when -2 , x < 1 and negative when x < -2. We need the region where the expression is less than 0 i.e. negative. So either 1 < x < 7 or x < -2. Now let me add another factor: (x+8)(x+2)(x-1)(x-7) Can I still say that the entire expression is positive in the rightmost region i.e. x>7 because each one of the four factors is positive? Yes. So basically, your rightmost region is always positive. You go from there and assign + and - signs to the regions. Your starting point is the rightmost region. Note: Make sure that the factors are of the form (ax - b), not (b - ax)... e.g. (x+2)(x-1)(7 - x)<0 Convert this to: (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)>0 (Multiply both sides by '-1') Now solve in the usual way. Assign '+' to the rightmost region and then alternate with '-' Since you are looking for positive value of the expression, every region where you put a '+' will be the region where the expression will be greater than 0. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Status: On...
Joined: 16 Jan 2011
Posts: 189
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 42 [5] , given: 62

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  10 Aug 2011, 16:01
5
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
WoW - This is a cool thread with so many thing on inequalities....I have compiled it together with some of my own ideas...It should help.

1) CORE CONCEPT
@gurpreetsingh -
Suppose you have the inequality

f(x) = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d) < 0

Arrange the NUMBERS in ascending order from left to right. a<b<c<d
Draw curve starting from + from right.

now if f(x) < 0 consider curve having "-" inside and if f(x) > 0 consider curve having "+" and combined solution will be the final solution. I m sure I have recalled it fully but if you guys find any issue on that do let me know, this is very helpful.

So for f(x) < 0 consider "-" curves and the ans is : (a < x < b) , (c < x < d)
and for f(x) > 0 consider "+" curves and the ans is : (x < a), (b < x < c) , (d < x)

If f(x) has three factors then the graph will have - + - +
If f(x) has four factors then the graph will have + - + - +

If you can not figure out how and why, just remember it.
Try to analyze that the function will have number of roots = number of factors and every time the graph will touch the x axis.

For the highest factor d if x>d then the whole f(x) > 0 and after every interval of the roots the signs will change alternatively.

Note: Make sure that the factors are of the form (ax - b), not (b - ax)...

example -
(x+2)(x-1)(7 - x)<0

Convert this to: (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)>0 (Multiply both sides by '-1')
Now solve in the usual way. Assign '+' to the rightmost region and then alternate with '-'
Since you are looking for positive value of the expression, every region where you put a '+' will be the region where the expression will be greater than 0.

2) Variation - ODD/EVEN POWER
@ulm/Karishma -
if we have even powers like (x-a)^2(x-b)
we don't need to change a sign when jump over "a".
This will be same as (x-b)

We can ignore squares BUT SHOULD consider ODD powers
example -
2.a
(x-a)^3(x-b)<0 is the same as (x-a)(x-b) <0
2.b
(x - a)(x - b)/(x - c)(x - d) < 0 ==> (x - a)(x - b)(x-c)^-1(x-d)^-1 <0
is the same as (x - a)(x - b)(x - c)(x - d) < 0

3) Variation <= in FRACTION
@mrinal2100 -
if = sign is included with < then <= will be there in solution
like for (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)(x-4) <=0 the solution will be -2 <= x <= 1 or 4<= x <= 7

BUT if it is a fraction the denominator in the solution will not have = SIGN

example -
3.a
(x + 2)(x - 1)/(x -4)(x - 7) < =0
the solution will be -2 <= x <= 1 or 4< x < 7
we cant make 4<=x<=7 as it will make the solution infinite

4) Variation - ROOTS
@Karishma -
As for roots, you have to keep in mind that given $$\sqrt{x}$$, x cannot be negative.

$$\sqrt{x}$$ < 10
implies 0 < $$\sqrt{x}$$ < 10
Squaring, 0 < x < 100
Root questions are specific. You have to be careful. If you have a particular question in mind, send it.

Refer - inequalities-and-roots-118619.html#p959939
Some more useful tips for ROOTS....I am too lazy to consolidate

<5> THESIS -
@gmat1220 -
Once algebra teacher told me - signs alternate between the roots. I said whatever and now I know why Watching this article is a stroll down the memory lane.

I will save this future references....

Anyone wants to add ABSOLUTE VALUES....That will be a value add to this post

_________________

Labor cost for typing this post >= Labor cost for pushing the Kudos Button
kudos-what-are-they-and-why-we-have-them-94812.html

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 5682
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1415

Kudos [?]: 7357 [3] , given: 186

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  09 Sep 2013, 22:35
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
karannanda wrote:
gurpreetsingh wrote:
I learnt this trick while I was in school and yesterday while solving one question I recalled.
Its good if you guys use it 1-2 times to get used to it.

Suppose you have the inequality

f(x) = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d) < 0

Just arrange them in order as shown in the picture and draw curve starting from + from right.

now if f(x) < 0 consider curve having "-" inside and if f(x) > 0 consider curve having "+" and combined solution will be the final solution. I m sure I have recalled it fully but if you guys find any issue on that do let me know, this is very helpful.

Don't forget to arrange then in ascending order from left to right. a<b<c<d

So for f(x) < 0 consider "-" curves and the ans is : (a < x < b) , (c < x < d)
and for f(x) > 0 consider "+" curves and the ans is : (x < a), (b < x < c) , (d < x)

If f(x) has three factors then the graph will have - + - +
If f(x) has four factors then the graph will have + - + - +

If you can not figure out how and why, just remember it.
Try to analyze that the function will have number of roots = number of factors and every time the graph will touch the x axis.

For the highest factor d if x>d then the whole f(x) > 0 and after every interval of the roots the signs will change alternatively.

Hi Gurpreet,
Thanks for the wonderful method.
I am trying to understand it so that i can apply it in tests.
Can you help me in applying this method to the below expression to find range of x.
x^3 – 4x^5 < 0?

I am getting the roots as -1/2, 0, 1/2 and when i plot them using this method, putting + in the rightmost region, I am not getting correct result. Not sure where i am going wrong. Can you pls help.

Before you apply the method, ensure that the factors are of the form (x - a)(x - b) etc

$$x^3 - 4x^5 < 0$$

$$x^3 ( 1 - 4x^2) < 0$$

$$x^3(1 - 2x) (1 + 2x) < 0$$

$$4x^3(x - 1/2)(x + 1/2) > 0$$ (Notice the flipped sign. We multiplied both sides by -1 to convert 1/2 - x to x - 1/2)

Now the transition points are 0, -1/2 and 1/2 so put + in the rightmost region.
The solution will be x > 1/2 or -1/2 < x< 0.

Check out these posts discussing such complications:
http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/06 ... e-factors/
http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/07 ... ns-part-i/
http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/07 ... s-part-ii/
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 5682 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1415 Kudos [?]: 7357 [2] , given: 186 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 23 Jul 2012, 02:13 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post Stiv wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: mrinal2100: Kudos to you for excellent thinking! Correct me if I'm wrong. If the lower part of the equation$$\frac {(x+2)(x-1)}{(x-4)(x-7)}$$ were $$4\leq x \leq 7$$, than the lower part would be equal to zero,thus making it impossible to calculate the whole equation. x cannot be equal to 4 or 7 because if x = 4 or x = 7, the denominator will be 0 and the expression will not be defined. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 336
Followers: 52

Kudos [?]: 380 [2] , given: 81

Inequalities trick [#permalink]  06 Jan 2015, 02:35
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Just came across this useful discussion.

VeritasPrepKarishma has given a very lucid explanation of how this “wavy line” method works.

I have noticed that there is still a little scope to take this discussion further. So here are my two cents on it.

I would like to highlight an important special case in the application of the Wavy Line Method

When there are multiple instances of the same root:

Try to solve the following inequality using the Wavy Line Method:

$$(x-1)^2(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)^3 < 0$$

To know how you did, compare your wavy line with the correct one below.

Did you notice how this inequality differs from all the examples above?

Notice that two of the four terms had an integral power greater than 1.

How to draw the wavy line for such expressions?

Let me directly show you how the wavy line would look and then later on the rule behind drawing it.

Attachment:
File comment: Observe how the wave bounces back at x = 1.

bounce.png [ 10.4 KiB | Viewed 2175 times ]

Notice that the curve bounced down at the point x = 1. (At every other root, including x = 4 whose power was 3, it was simply passing through them.)

Can you figure out why the wavy line looks like this for this particular inequality?

(Hint: The wavy line for the inequality

$$(x-1)^{38}(x-2)^{57}(x-3)^{15}(x-4)^{27} < 0$$

Is also the same as above)

Come on! Give it a try.

If you got it right, you’ll see that there are essentially only two rules while drawing a wavy line. (Remember, we’ll refer the region above the number line as positive region and the region below the number line as negative region.)

How to draw the wavy line?

1. How to start: Start from the top right most portion. Be ready to alternate (or not alternate) the region of the wave based on how many times a point is root to the given expression.

2. How to alternate: In the given expression, if the power of a term is odd, then the wave simply passes through the corresponding point (root) into the other region (to –ve region if the wave is currently in the positive region and to the +ve region if the wave is currently in the negative region). However, if the power of a term is even, then the wave bounces back into the same region.

Now look back at the above expression and analyze your wavy line. Were you (intuitively) using the above mentioned rules while drawing your wavy line?

Solution

Once you get your wavy line right, solving an inequality becomes very easy. For instance, for the above inequality, since we need to look for the space where the above expression would be less than zero, look for the areas in the wavy line where the curve is below the number line.

So the correct solution set would simply be {3 < x < 4} U {{x < 2} – {1}}

In words, it is the Union of two regions region1 between x = 3 and x = 4 and region2 which is x < 2, excluding the point x = 1.

Food for Thought

Now, try to answer the following questions:

1. Why did we exclude the point x = 1 from the solution set of the last example? (Easy Question)
2. Why do the above mentioned rules (especially rule #2) work? What is/are the principle(s) working behind the curtains?

Foot Note: Although the post is meant to deal with inequality expressions containing multiple roots, the above rules to draw the wavy line are generic and are applicable in all cases.

- Krishna
_________________

Last edited by EgmatQuantExpert on 10 Jan 2015, 20:41, edited 1 time in total.
Current Student
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2800
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 196

Kudos [?]: 1162 [1] , given: 235

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  19 Mar 2010, 11:59
1
KUDOS
ttks10 wrote:
Can u plz explainn the backgoround of this & then the explanation.

Thanks

i m sorry i dont have any background for it, you just re-read it again and try to implement whenever you get such question and I will help you out in any issue.

sidhu4u wrote:
I have applied this trick and it seemed to be quite useful.

Nice to hear this....good luck.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2028
Followers: 138

Kudos [?]: 1165 [1] , given: 376

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  26 May 2011, 19:55
1
KUDOS
chethanjs wrote:
mrinal2100 wrote:
if = sign is included with < then <= will be there in solution
like for (x+2)(x-1)(x-7)(x-4) <=0 the solution will be -2 <= x <= 1 or 4<= x <= 7

in case when factors are divided then the numerator will contain = sign

like for (x + 2)(x - 1)/(x -4)(x - 7) < =0
the solution will be -2 <= x <= 1 or 4< x < 7
we cant make 4<=x<=7 as it will make the solution infinite

correct me if i am wrong

Can you please tell me why the solution gets infinite for 4<=x<=7 ?

Thanks.

(x -4)(x - 7) is in denominator.
Making x=4 or 7 would make the denominator 0 and the entire function undefined.

Thus, the range of x can't be either 4 or 7.
4<=x<=7 would be wrong.
4<x<7 is correct because now we removed "=" sign.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 257
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 123 [1] , given: 121

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  22 Jul 2012, 02:03
1
KUDOS
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
mrinal2100: Kudos to you for excellent thinking!

Correct me if I'm wrong.
If the lower part of the equation$$\frac {(x+2)(x-1)}{(x-4)(x-7)}$$ were $$4\leq x \leq 7$$, than the lower part would be equal to zero,thus making it impossible to calculate the whole equation.
_________________

Kudos if you like the post!

Failing to plan is planning to fail.

Current Student
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2800
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 196

Kudos [?]: 1162 [1] , given: 235

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  18 Oct 2012, 04:17
1
KUDOS
GMATBaumgartner wrote:
gurpreetsingh wrote:
ulm wrote:
if we have smth like (x-a)^2(x-b)
we don't need to change a sign when jump over "a".

yes even powers wont contribute to the inequality sign. But be wary of the root value of x=a

Hi Gurpreet,
Could you elaborate what exactly you meant here in highlighted text ?

Even I have a doubt as to how this can be applied for powers of the same term . like the example mentioned in the post above.

If the powers are even then the inequality won't be affected.

eg if u have to find the range of values of x satisfying (x-a)^2 *(x-b)(x-c) >0

just use (x-b)*(x-c) >0 because x-a raised to the power 2 will not affect the inequality sign. But just make sure x=a is taken care off , as it would make the inequality zero.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 5682
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1415

Kudos [?]: 7357 [1] , given: 186

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  18 Oct 2012, 09:27
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
GMATBaumgartner wrote:
Hi Gurpreet,
Could you elaborate what exactly you meant here in highlighted text ?

Even I have a doubt as to how this can be applied for powers of the same term . like the example mentioned in the post above.

In addition, you can check out this post:

http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/07 ... s-part-ii/

I have discussed how to handle powers in it.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Math Expert Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 28348 Followers: 4485 Kudos [?]: 45444 [1] , given: 6761 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 02 Dec 2012, 06:25 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post GMATGURU1 wrote: Going ahead in this inequalities area of GMAT, can some one has the problem numbers of inequalities in OG 11 and OG 12? Cheers, Danny Search for hundreds of question with solutions by tags: viewforumtags.php DS questions on inequalities: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=184 PS questions on inequalities: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=189 Hardest DS inequality questions with detailed solutions: inequality-and-absolute-value-questions-from-my-collection-86939.html Hope it helps. _________________ Current Student Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want. Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 2800 Location: Malaysia Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship Schools: ISB '15 (M) GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35 Followers: 196 Kudos [?]: 1162 [1] , given: 235 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 20 Dec 2012, 20:04 1 This post received KUDOS VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: The entire concept is based on positive/negative factors which means <0 or >0 is a must. If the question is not in this format, you need to bring it to this format by taking the constant to the left hand side. e.g. (x + 2)(x + 3) < 2 x^2 + 5x + 6 - 2 < 0 x^2 + 5x + 4 < 0 (x+4)(x+1) < 0 Now use the concept. Yes this is probable but it might not be possible always to group them. So in case you are unsure just follow the number plugging approach. But most of the times this trick would be very handy. _________________ Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight Money Saved is the Money Earned Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings Gmat test review : 670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html Math Expert Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 28348 Followers: 4485 Kudos [?]: 45444 [1] , given: 6761 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 11 Nov 2013, 06:51 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post anujpadia wrote: Can you please explain the above mentioned concept in relation to the following question? Is a > O? (1) a^3 - 0 < 0 (2) 1- a^2 > 0 Can you please explain the scenario when (x-a)(x-B)(x-C)(x-d)>0? Sorry, but finding it difficult to understand. Check alternative solutions here: is-a-0-1-a-3-a-0-2-1-a-86749.html Hope this helps. _________________ Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 5682 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1415 Kudos [?]: 7357 [1] , given: 186 Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink] 23 Apr 2014, 03:43 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post 1 This post was BOOKMARKED PathFinder007 wrote: I have a query. I have following question x^3 - 4x^5 < 0 I can define this as (1+2x).x^3(1-2x). now I have roots -1/2, 0, 1/2. so in case of >1/2 I will always get inequality value as <0 and in case of -1/2 and 0 I will get value as 0. So How I will define them in graph and what range I will consider for this inequality. Thanks The factors must be of the form (x - a)(x - b) .... etc x^3 - 4x^5 < 0 x^3 * (1 - 4x^2) < 0 x^3 * (1 - 2x) * (1 + 2x) < 0 x^3 * (2x - 1) * (2x + 1) > 0 (Note the sign flip because 1-2x was changed to 2x - 1) x^3 * 2(x - 1/2) *2(x + 1/2) > 0 So transition points are 0, 1/2 and -1/2. ____________ - 1/2 _____ 0 ______1/2 _________ This is what it looks like on the number line. The rightmost region is positive. We want the positive regions in the inequality. So the desired range of x is given by x > 1/2 or -1/2 < x< 0 For more on this method, check these posts: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/06 ... e-factors/ http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/07 ... ns-part-i/ http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/07 ... s-part-ii/ The links will give you the theory behind this method in detail. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 56

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  11 Nov 2014, 08:52
1
KUDOS
For statement I

(1) (1-2x)(1+x)<0

Once you get this into the req form

2 (x-1/2) (x+1) > 0

sol +++++ -1 ------ 1/2 +++++
As Karishma pointed out ponce in the req form, the rightmost will always be positive and the alternating will happen from there.

So sol for this x> 1/2 and x<-1

Integers greater than 1/2 and less than -1 , thus |x| may be >= 1. Unsure

Thus Insufficient.

For Statement II

(2) (1-x)(1+2x)<0

Once you get this into the req form

2(x+1/2) (x-1) > 0

sol +++++ -1/2 ------ 1 +++++

So sol for this x>1 and x< -1/2

Integers greater than 1 and less than -1/2 , thus |x| may be >= 1. Unsure

Thus Insufficient.

Combining Both the statements

x<-1 and x>1

Thus Integers for this range will give |x| > 1

Thus Sufficient.

Hope this helps. I am not very confident of my solution though. Its my first solution gmatclub

mayankpant wrote:
gurpreetsingh wrote:
I learnt this trick while I was in school and yesterday while solving one question I recalled.
Its good if you guys use it 1-2 times to get used to it.

Suppose you have the inequality

f(x) = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d) < 0

Just arrange them in order as shown in the picture and draw curve starting from + from right.

now if f(x) < 0 consider curve having "-" inside and if f(x) > 0 consider curve having "+" and combined solution will be the final solution. I m sure I have recalled it fully but if you guys find any issue on that do let me know, this is very helpful.

Don't forget to arrange then in ascending order from left to right. a<b<c<d

So for f(x) < 0 consider "-" curves and the ans is : (a < x < b) , (c < x < d)
and for f(x) > 0 consider "+" curves and the ans is : (x < a), (b < x < c) , (d < x)

If f(x) has three factors then the graph will have - + - +
If f(x) has four factors then the graph will have + - + - +

If you can not figure out how and why, just remember it.
Try to analyze that the function will have number of roots = number of factors and every time the graph will touch the x axis.

For the highest factor d if x>d then the whole f(x) > 0 and after every interval of the roots the signs will change alternatively.

Hi
Can you please explain this question to me using the graph. I am missing the point when graph is being used here?

If x is an integer, is |x|>1?
(1) (1-2x)(1+x)<0
(2) (1-x)(1+2x)<0

For me ,the first equations roots are -1 and 1/2. Now I am struggling to get to the correct sign using the graph method here.

Same for second equation: roots are 1 and -1/2 but struggling for the sign.

THanks
Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: Inequalities trick [#permalink]  16 Mar 2010, 09:46
Can u plz explainn the backgoround of this & then the explanation.

Thanks
Re: Inequalities trick   [#permalink] 16 Mar 2010, 09:46

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 105 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
127 Tips and Tricks: Inequalities 27 14 Apr 2013, 08:20
inequality, 11 09 Sep 2007, 12:18
Inequalities 3 09 Dec 2006, 04:28
inequalities 1 06 Aug 2006, 07:23
inequalities 3 05 Dec 2005, 11:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by