Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Is the above correct? If so, I solved to get x <= 7/5, x>= -1, x <= 03, x >= 7/5. However, 4GMAT seems to solve this by squaring the absolute values on both sides of the equation....please comment...

Is the above correct? If so, I solved to get x <= 7/5, x>= -1, x <= 03, x >= 7/5. However, 4GMAT seems to solve this by squaring the absolute values on both sides of the equation....please comment...

Since you have to consider 4 different scenarios for absolute value problems like this one above, squaring it and then solving is faster. _________________

Is the above correct? If so, I solved to get x <= 7/5, x>= -1, x <= 03, x >= 7/5. However, 4GMAT seems to solve this by squaring the absolute values on both sides of the equation....please comment...

Since you have to consider 4 different scenarios for absolute value problems like this one above, squaring it and then solving is faster.

I'm aware of the solution by squaring. Are we sure that it provides a solution with all possible values of x?

Is the above correct? If so, I solved to get x <= 7/5, x>= -1, x <= 03, x >= 7/5. However, 4GMAT seems to solve this by squaring the absolute values on both sides of the equation....please comment...

Since you have to consider 4 different scenarios for absolute value problems like this one above, squaring it and then solving is faster.

I'm aware of the solution by squaring. Are we sure that it provides a solution with all possible values of x?

If you square absolute values, the final equation will have exactly the same roots as the original. However if some of the variables are not in absolute values, you can end up with more roots then the original (consider |x|=2x+1 ). But you will never lose a root because of squaring.