elegan wrote:
Innovators are developing a new cutting machine that hopes to distinguish weeds from agricultural crops by use of the latest technology in sensors. The differences in shade of color will be the basis for making the distinction. In their pitch to venture capitalists, the innovators point to the ability to lower labor costs by completely removing the need for manual weeding.
Which of the following is a consideration in favor of the company's implementing its plan to develop the prototype?
(A) Some plants change the shade of their color considerably as they grow.
If this is the case it will be very difficult to pick the right plant this weakens rather than strengthening
(B) When weeding may not be found necessary laborers engaged in that work can find other jobs in agriculture during the growing season.
This couldn't make any sense in the first place in addition work finding is completely irrelevant to the question asked
(C) While weeds are being removed manually, the prime consideration to identify them is the shape of the leaf and its overall size.
If this is the case then the distinction made through the shade of the colour wouldn't be much of any help
(D) Genetic manipulation will allow any species of plants to be bred economically, so that it can have a distinctive shade, color and other characteristics remaining unaltered.
This will help in creating unique shades and categorising it and distinguishing it
(E) Different species of weeds show considerable variations in the shade of their color.
This will also be completely determental to the plan since this lead to the real crops developing into the shades of the plants this will lead to real trouble in distinguishing
Therefore IMO D