MBAEssayHelp wrote:
INSEAD has a very high yield. If you are waitlisted, it means that your chances for the given intake are slim. Based on the experience with my clients, I would say about 25% candidates from the waitlist make it to the school.
However, good news is that you will be given priority for next intake as waitlist means that you were a good candidate but INSEAD didn't have enough seats. You need to keep in touch with the adcom, keep on sending updates every couple of month and re-iterate your interest in the school. Then, apply for the next intake.
Regards,
George Jacobs
https://www.htbconsultants.com Affordable Essay Editing Service
George,
Thanks for the insight. However this does not necessarily compare with an
accepted.com interview with INSEAD adcom (about 2/5 down the page), where one answer states:
"It varies a lot. We have been in a position where most of the people on the waitlist were offered a place. I have also experienced situations where we were not able to give many places to the waitlisted candidates."
Source:
https://www.accepted.com/chat/transcript ... nsead.aspxI think stating a % figure so authoritatively is misleading, and while I am by no means an admissions professional, I believe it to be equally inaccurate. I'd like to know how many people in your experience you have consulted for wrt INSEAD, and how many of those were waitlisted. With all due respect, I would think very few made it to the W/L stage for you to qualify that statement.
A bit of reality and expectation-management is always welcome, but the bluntness of your statement is a "reality call" gone too far, and again, as far as I'm concerned at this point, unqualified. Look at the Jan 11 Intake Waitlist thread. 65% of those registered on the thread were ultimately accepted. That's not 25%, it's not 35% or even 45%. Yes, the sample size is small, but it's at least a somewhat qualified figure.
And yes, INSEAD's yield is high -- among the highest across the board from what I understand. I would say in the high 70%s. But over 20% of applicants still decide not to enroll at INSEAD, for whatever reason (HBS/Stanford/Wharton/LBS/?). Some people, believe it or not, apply to INSEAD as a 2nd or 3rd choice. I would be shocked if the adcom did not manage the size of their waitlist accordingly, and a figure of 25% does not logically click with me when the adcom says the list is "comparatively small". If the long-term run-rate conversion from W/L-to-admit were indeed 25%, then I, as an admissions professional at INSEAD (were I one), would at least halve the size of the W/L'd candidates in order to minimize the amount of time spent on monthly reviews and make my life easier.
I'm not saying my figure of 65% is particularly accurate either. As the adcom mentions in the above interview, they've seen instances of near 100% W/L-to-Admit, and ones closer to the opposite extreme. However, my hunch is that the most analogous comparison would be the last 2 intakes, chronologically, especially with respect to those registered on GMATClub (a self-selecting group not necessarily comparable to the average INSEAD applicant or waitlister, for that matter). As a side, I would imagine their closer-to-zero W/L-to-admit % was during the GFC in 08/09 or thereabouts when I-bankers were losing their jobs in waves. Could have also been in 01/02/03 for similar reasons.
All conjecture aside, let's be honest with ourselves. I don't have the actual figures, you don't have them either (though you probably have more direct, personal experience with the waitlist process). The only people who do (INSEAD), aren't generous enough to disclose them for our benefit.
What I think we can agree upon is the fact that waitlisted applicants need to be realistic about their future plans and manage their own expectations; but that does not mean that they need to be pessimistic and hang their heads about their chances at INSEAD. Might as well apply to your second and third choice schools in the meantime, and wait out the next two months for a positive response from the admissions committee instead of admitting defeat.