Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Oct 2014, 10:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 53
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 0

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2008, 12:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

83% (02:07) correct 17% (01:11) wrong based on 569 sessions
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - installing [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2008, 12:09
vermatanya wrote:
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution.


can anybody help me out in CR. m finding this section difficult.




-thanx



D. The argument assumes that both cannot be used at the same time. If this were true, then Northern Power would not be doing everything it can, thus the argument falls apart.
5 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 104 [5] , given: 0

Re: CR - installing [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2008, 17:48
5
This post received
KUDOS
Conclusion: By installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Jolt down in mind some of the assumptions on which argument based:
1. [Assumption can serve to fill in a logic gap.] Scrubbers will reduce the harmful emissions
2. [Assumption can serve to fill in a logic gap.] Clean fuel reduce the harmful emissions
3. [Assumption can establish the feasibility of the premises of the argument] Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than the cleaner-burning fuel.
4. [Assumption can eliminate alternate path to the same end] There is no better alternative way for the Northern Power to reduce the most of the harmful emissions than to install scrubbers.

Now, let check the answer choices that closely matches with our mental argument assumption dump (I mean our list)

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers. [This argument is not about Northern Power’s expensive/inexpensive mode installing scrubbers – Eliminate it]
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others. [This argument is not about list of scrubbers choices that Northern Power has – Eliminate it]
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants. [Contradicts the conclusion – Eliminate it]
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone. [This sounds close to our mental assumption 4 – hold it]
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution. [Definitely not interested in Northern Power’s day to day business – Eliminate it]

Answer: D
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 85
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR - installing [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2008, 18:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
D
doing both would be much better than one alone.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR - installing [#permalink] New post 23 Jan 2008, 05:50
1
This post received
KUDOS
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
vermatanya wrote:
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution.


can anybody help me out in CR. m finding this section difficult.




-thanx



D. The argument assumes that both cannot be used at the same time. If this were true, then Northern Power would not be doing everything it can, thus the argument falls apart.
+1

Agree with D here. Just a bit detailed explanation...

It is really a good technique to use negating test on assumptions questions. Ask yourself what if the proposed assumption is not true..? Apply to each answer choice until you find the one that make the argument fall apart. Here is an example of how it works
e.g. Let's take the answer choice "D":
Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone. But if this is not true, and Harmful emissions can be reduced more by using both methods together, then the conclusion does not make much sense any more: "Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants",.. because "they will be doing the most.." by using both methods together.. So they have to assume that using both methods will not be any better than just installing scrubbers.

This logic works every time for assumption questions.
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 294 [1] , given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR - installing [#permalink] New post 23 Jan 2008, 20:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
hanumayamma wrote:
Conclusion: By installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Jolt down in mind some of the assumptions on which argument based:
1. [Assumption can serve to fill in a logic gap.] Scrubbers will reduce the harmful emissions
2. [Assumption can serve to fill in a logic gap.] Clean fuel reduce the harmful emissions
3. [Assumption can establish the feasibility of the premises of the argument] Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than the cleaner-burning fuel.
4. [Assumption can eliminate alternate path to the same end] There is no better alternative way for the Northern Power to reduce the most of the harmful emissions than to install scrubbers.

Now, let check the answer choices that closely matches with our mental argument assumption dump (I mean our list)

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers. [This argument is not about Northern Power’s expensive/inexpensive mode installing scrubbers – Eliminate it]
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others. [This argument is not about list of scrubbers choices that Northern Power has – Eliminate it]
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants. [Contradicts the conclusion – Eliminate it]
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone. [This sounds close to our mental assumption 4 – hold it]
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution. [Definitely not interested in Northern Power’s day to day business – Eliminate it]

Answer: D


Assumption should be A

and A still belongs to "Assumption can eliminate alternate path to the same end." A means that Cost is not the factor for one to choose installation of scrubber, rather than switching to cleaner -burning fuel.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 295
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - installing [#permalink] New post 23 Jan 2008, 21:12
D it is.

Argument says that "installing scrubbers will do the most they can do"...i.e it better not be less than the two methods put together...
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 445
Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 41

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2009, 20:28
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B) Northern Power can choose from among various kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C) Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D) Harmful emissions from Northern Power’s plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E) Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution.
_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.


Last edited by doe007 on 17 Apr 2013, 19:18, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 123
Location: France
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 15

Re: cleaner-burning fuel [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2009, 20:41
D) Colclusion states that "by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the [color=#FF0000]most that...." So there is a clear assumption that these 2 methods can't be used together to reduce more[/color]
_________________

GMAT Club Error Log V3.0 - with Timer
GMAT Club Error Log
Spoilt Error Log V0.0.9 - with Timer
Awesome Error Log - By Spoilt and Trianglock

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Applying
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 158
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.65
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Re: cleaner-burning fuel [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2009, 21:34
IMO ...E

Since the assumption fits in nicely with what the company can do to reduce the emissions.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 300
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 9

Re: cleaner-burning fuel [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2009, 17:28
D.

two are not in conflict so why not both..good Q.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 49
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: cleaner-burning fuel [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2009, 13:44
D

The most it could do would be to install both scrubbers and use cleaner burning fuel.
However, they are assuming Northern Power can't use both so in that case they would be doing the most they can do to decrease harmful emissions
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 39

Re: cleaner-burning fuel [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2011, 03:39
Scrubbers and fuel are two methods to reduce harm emissions. Scrubbers are more effective than fuel.
Hence by installing scrubbers company is doing the most it can do to reduce emissions.

The argument clearly assumes that xyz is the best way to reduce emissions. Assuming that no other way is better. That is combined effect is not better.
Choices are
A -- $ aspect is out of scope
B -- might be true and strengthen the concl, but not necessary for it to follow. Even if all scrubbers are equally effective, the combined effect can be more effective. Also, the more effective scrubbers combined with fuel can be still more effective.
C -- Out of scope. If anything it weakens the conclusion
D -- Correct choice as mentioned earlier
E -- Out of scope. The argument does not deal with whether the cumulative emissions of NP are low or high.
_________________

Hope this post helps! :)
Your kudos will let me know.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2013, 00:08
Often, the argument jumps to a conclusion without filling in the gap. In this argument, the author states that Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions better than the other approach. Then, it jumps to conclude that, Scrubbers will be doing the MOST of what can be done...

Obviously the assumption is there is no better alternative than Scrubbers...


(A) the cost is irrelevant...
(B) different scrubbers... fine, fine but that this doesn't show why the author jumps to conclusion and believe that the most that can be done is the Scrubbers
(C) their commitment is irrelevant...
(D) if combination of the two methods produce far better results than Scrubbers alone then the conclusion will be invalid.. hence, this needs to be assumed...
(E) the sources of emissions is irrelevant...

Answer: D
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 307
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 46

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 03:23
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution\sqrt{}
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Posts: 184
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V46
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 115 [1] , given: 12

Re: Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 04:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi,

This is an assumption that you can come up with before going to answer choices. Having a good grip on the "story" of the questions is critical. Sometimes it helps to paraphrase: There's a power company. They can have ONLY two options for creating cleaner emissions: clean fuel or filters. Filters do more than clean fuel. Therefore for max clean they should choose filters.

We were never told that the choices are mutually exclusive. Maybe we can choose both. It is important NOT to add anything or lose anything from the story. It is very easy to add the idea of exclusivity because in our normal lives we make many decisions based on the idea that you can't have both (you choose one movie, one apartment, one entree...) but on the GMAT options are not mutually exclusive unless we are told so.

Happy Studies,

HG.
_________________

"It is a curious property of research activity that after the problem has been solved the solution seems obvious. This is true not only for those who have not previously been acquainted with the problem, but also for those who have worked over it for years." -Dr. Edwin Land

GMAT Sample Questions to assess your GMAT Quant.

If you found my post useful KUDOS are much appreciated.

IMPROVE YOUR READING COMPREHENSION with the ECONOMIST READING COMPREHENSION CHALLENGE:

Here is the first set along with some strategies for approaching this work: http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-economist-reading-comprehension-challenge-151479.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 70

Re: Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 19:21
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1100
Location: United States
Followers: 127

Kudos [?]: 1312 [1] , given: 120

Premium Member
Re: Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 21:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
vermatanya wrote:
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution


Premise: Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will
Conclusion: by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions

Assumption: Scrubbers and cleaner-burning working together cannot reduce more than each method working alone.
Negation technique: If both methods working together reduces more than each method working alone. The conclusion is broken.

D is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 193
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 72

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2014, 06:45
vermatanya wrote:
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution



Conclusion: by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants
premise: Scrubbers will reduce harmfull emission more than cleaner-burning fuels will.

Assumption: 1) Cleaner fuel will not reduce the harmful emission as Scrubbers
2) Installing scrubbers is the only way for Northern power to reduce the emission and they dont have any other way to reduce.


(A)Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers. - Out of scope - Expensive is not in play now
(B)Northern Power can choose from among various Kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others. - Out of scope - Various kind of scrubbers is not an issue
(C)Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants. - Breaks the conclusion directly
(D)Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone. - seems to be more in align with our assumption 2. Negating this choice breaks the conclusion.
(E)Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution - Irrelevant to our conclusion


Press kudos if this helped.

Regards,
Swami.
Re: Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to   [#permalink] 21 Apr 2014, 06:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to mun23 0 06 Mar 2013, 04:20
1 Switches vannu 10 14 Aug 2009, 06:52
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to snipertrader 0 18 Aug 2011, 17:49
career switch cat 0 14 Feb 2005, 09:41
Switch to Operations? SR92612 1 13 Oct 2004, 11:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.