Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 10 Jul 2014, 12:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, [#permalink] New post 22 Jul 2005, 19:59
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

100% (01:30) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, investigators should find out why the error was made by analyzing airplane design, airline management, and pilot-training programs. For only then can changes be made to ensure that the same type of error does not recur and cause another accident.

Which of the following is a presupposition of the argument above?

(A) Pilot error is not a contributing factor in most airline accidents.
(B) Airline companies themselves should be the agents who investigate airline accidents.
(C) Stricter government regulation of airline companies will make air travel significantly safer.
(D) Investigators of airline accidents should contribute to the prevention of future accidents.
(E) Most pilots who make errors in flying will repeat their errors unless they are retrained.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2005, 05:46
Picked D.

HMTG.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2005, 05:52
Picked A. If we negate A, the argument falls apart.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2005, 19:42
My pick is D.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2005, 19:45
riteshgupta1 wrote:
Picked A. If we negate A, the argument falls apart.


It does not.

Nothing in the paragraph suggests that pilot error is NOT a contributing factor to airline accidents. Instead, it is merely suggesting that investigations should be more focused on other factors.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2005, 23:20
i would go for E...

My reason:

A) is wrong because pilot error is one of the contributing factor in airline accident.
B) is wrong because the whole argument is not about who does the investigation, but what should the investigation lead to
C) is wrong becoz Provides a solution, does not make any assumption to the argument
D) again, the argument is not focusing on who, but what should be investigated
E) ".....For only then can changes be made....." indicates that if pilots are retrained will future accidents be prevented.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 674
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2005, 06:07
D looks like it......


Investigator contribution should add more value is the assumption
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2005, 09:47
I would have picked (D) if "should" were to be substituted for "would".
Should sounds, in that case, more like "must".
Correct me if I'm wrong.


(A) - if pilot error wasn't major contributing factor, then pilot-training programs wouldn't be mentioned by the author.

(E) makes sense, yet it is weak.

What is OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2005, 14:04
D is the answer. If the investigators find out the issue and then move on without contributing to the prevention of recurrence, then the argument falls apart.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2005, 05:40
OA is D.
  [#permalink] 26 Jul 2005, 05:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, unplugged 7 21 May 2009, 01:52
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, surbab 6 05 Apr 2007, 10:39
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, arjsingh1976 7 27 Oct 2006, 01:53
2 Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, nocilis 7 28 Jan 2005, 14:00
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, GMATPIPO 4 07 Jan 2005, 15:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.