Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 04:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 1

Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2009, 16:40
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (06:25) wrong based on 1

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (01:46) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (03:10) correct 50% (00:48) wrong based on 2

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (03:13) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:32) wrong based on 1

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (02:08) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1

### HideShow timer Statistics

Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of arguments that prevail by virtue of good reasoning and do not depend on coercion or convention. A contrasting notion, institutional authority, refers to the power of social institutions to enforce acceptance of arguments that may or may not possess intellectual authority. The authority wielded by legal systems is especially interesting because such systems are institutions that nonetheless aspire to a purely intellectual authority. One judge goes so far as to claim that courts are merely passive vehicles for applying the intellectual authority of the law and possess no coercive powers of their own.

In contrast, some critics maintain that whatever authority judicial pronouncements have is exclusively institutional. Some of these critics go further, claiming that intellectual authority does not really exist—i.e., it reduces to institutional authority. But it can be countered that these claims break down when a sufficiently broad historical perspective is taken: Not all arguments accepted by institutions withstand the test of time, and some well-reasoned arguments never receive institutional imprimatur. The reasonable argument that goes unrecognized in its own time because it challenges institutional beliefs is common in intellectual history; intellectual authority and institutional consensus are not the same thing.

But the critics might respond, intellectual authority is only recognized as such because of institutional consensus. For example, if a musicologist were to claim that an alleged musical genius who, after several decades, had not gained respect and recognition for his or her compositions is probably not a genius, the critics might say that basing a judgment on a unit of time—“several decades”—is an institutional rather than an intellectual construct. What, the critics might ask, makes a particular number of decades reasonable evidence by which to judge genius? The answer, of course, is nothing, except for the fact that such institutional procedures have proved useful to musicologists in making such distinctions in the past.

The analogous legal concept is the doctrine of precedent, i.e., a judge’s merely deciding a case a certain way becoming a basis for deciding later cases the same way—a pure example of institutional authority. But eh critics miss the crucial distinction that when a judicial decision is badly reasoned, or simply no longer applies in the face of evolving social standards or practices, the notion of intellectual authority is introduced: judges reconsider, revise, or in some cases throw out in the reconsideration of decisions, leading one to draw the conclusion that legal systems contain a significant degree of intellectual authority even if the thrust of their power is predominantly institutional.
9. Which one of the following most accurately states the main idea of the passage?
(A) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely intellectual, these systems possess a degree of institutional authority due to their ability to enforce acceptance of badly reasoned or socially inappropriate judicial decisions.
(B) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely institutional, theses systems are more correctly seen as vehicles for applying the intellectual authority of the law while possessing no coercive power of their own.
(C) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely intellectual, these systems in fact wield institutional authority by virtue of the fact that intellectual authority reduces to institutional authority.
(D) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely institutional, these systems possesses a degree of intellectual authority due to their ability to reconsider badly reasoned or socially inappropriate judicial decisions.
(E) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely intellectual, these systems in fact wield exclusively institutional authority in that they possess the power to enforce acceptance of badly reasoned or socially inappropriate judicial decisions.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

10. That some arguments “never receive institutional imprimatur” (line 22-23) most likely means that these arguments
(A) fail to gain institutional consensus
(B) fail to challenge institutional beliefs
(C) fail to conform to the example of precedent
(D) fail to convince by virtue of good reasoning
(E) fail to gain acceptance except by coercion
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

11. Which one of the following, if true, most challenges the author’s contention that legal systems contain a significant degree of intellectual authority?
(A) Judges often act under time constraints and occasionally render a badly reasoned or socially inappropriate decision.
(B) In some legal systems, the percentage of judicial decisions that contain faulty reasoning is far higher than it is in other legal systems.
(C) Many socially inappropriate legal decisions are thrown out by judges only after citizens begin to voice opposition to them.
(D) In some legal systems, the percentage of judicial decisions that are reconsidered and revised is far higher than it is in other legal systems.
(E) Judges are rarely willing to rectify the examples of faulty reasoning they discover when reviewing previous legal decisions.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

12. Given the information in the passage, the author is LEAST likely to believe which one of the following?
(A) Institutional authority may depend on coercion; intellectual authority never does.
(B) Intellectual authority may accept well-reasoned arguments; institutional authority never does.
(C) Institutional authority may depend on convention; intellectual authority never does.
(D) Intellectual authority sometimes challenges institutional beliefs; institutional authority never does.
(E) Intellectual authority sometimes conflicts with precedent; institutional authority never does.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

13. The author discusses the example from musicology primarily in order to
(A) distinguish the nothing of institutional authority from that of intellectual authority
(B) given an example of an argument possessing intellectual authority that did not prevail in its own time
(C) identify an example in which the ascription of musical genius did not withstand the test of time
(D) illustrate the claim that assessing intellectual authority requires an appeal to institutional authority
(E) demonstrate that the authority wielded by the arbiters of musical genius is entirely institutional
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

14. Based on the passage, the author would be most likely to hold which one of the following views about the doctrine of precedent?
(A) it is the only tool judges should use if they wish to achieve a purely intellectual authority.
(B) It is a useful tool in theory but in practice it invariably conflicts with the demands of intellectual authority.
(C) It is a useful tool but lacks intellectual authority unless it is combined with the reconsidering of decisions.
(D) It is often an unreliable tool because it prevents judges from reconsidering the intellectual authority of past decisions.
(E) It is an unreliable tool that should be abandoned because it lacks intellectual authority.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #5 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #6 OA

Last edited by fameatop on 27 Jul 2013, 19:18, edited 1 time in total.
Incorrect Format n lack of OA
If you have any questions
New!
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 1

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2009, 08:47
DAEDEC 19 mins

I will post OAs after 7 PM ET.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 1

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2009, 15:30
OAs DAEBDC
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1286
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 400 [0], given: 0

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2009, 19:28
Though Im late but here r my answers:

D A E B C C

Hemant what is the source? I found it really tough.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 7

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2009, 13:58
Seems a typical LSAT RC (law related topic).
DAEDDB

Stem 5 1/4 min
Questions 9min

Need to reduce time spent to 4-4.5 min per long passage, and 1 min per question.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 1

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2009, 17:05
ritula wrote:
Though Im late but here r my answers:

D A E B C C

Hemant what is the source? I found it really tough.

LSAT

Since I started doing RCs I always feel like doing this. I have hardly visited Quanta forums in last one week or so.

Waiting for Nitya to join but he seems busy these days.

Good luck Ritula and do sleep well before exam
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1286
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 400 [0], given: 0

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2009, 21:05
U r right abt RC. it is indeed addictive.
Thanks a lot for ur wishes. I will surely follow ur advice
hemantsood wrote:
ritula wrote:
Though Im late but here r my answers:

D A E B C C

Hemant what is the source? I found it really tough.

LSAT

Since I started doing RCs I always feel like doing this. I have hardly visited Quanta forums in last one week or so.

Waiting for Nitya to join but he seems busy these days.

Good luck Ritula and do sleep well before exam
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 139
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2009, 09:19
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 259
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 9

Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2009, 08:50
DAEBDC

Can someone explain 5. I got confused between d and e
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 3

Re: Filling in for Nitya... Intellectual authority is defined [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2013, 02:50
DAEBDC
Timings:IR-4:41
1) :38 ; 2)1:19 ; 3) 3:04 ; 4)1:09 ; 5) 3:51 ; 6) :48
OA time:15:33 mins
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 12
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 47

Re: Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2013, 04:52
A Reasonable hard Rc to read,
Took 10 Mins
all Correct but the 13. It also includes a bit of guess work.
Its actually quite difficult to nail these types especially aftr frying ur brain in Quant.
Nonetheless, very good of the sorts to Practice.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10439
Followers: 885

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 12:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume   [#permalink] 15 Apr 2016, 12:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Author's tone 0 22 Jul 2010, 05:29
How to find the authors attitude towards passage? 3 11 Jul 2009, 10:50
The author presents the information concerning bat sonar in 3 25 May 2009, 10:24
1 RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses 13 13 Oct 2008, 05:07
RC: author’s attitude toward something in the passage 1 03 Jul 2007, 12:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by